Trevor Tombe Profile picture
Jun 22 4 tweets 1 min read
Inflation pressures are broad-based, to be absolutely clear, but this is worth noting: if shelter and energy prices remained flat since last year, I estimate headline inflation would have been 3.2% in May instead of 7.7%. #cdnecon
This is not to deny the financial pressures that price increases create. But it shows that the biggest pressures are narrowly concentrated. This may matter for policy makers trying to figure out where to direct efforts and to understand what is going on.
Also worth noting, this doesn't account for the spillover effects of rising energy prices on goods and services throughout the economy. This is hard to estimate, but my best attempt is that this may add another 1-1.5 points on top of energy's direct 2.5 point contribution in May.
I've long thought current high inflation is largely a shelter and energy price story. I still think so.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trevor Tombe

Trevor Tombe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @trevortombe

Jun 23
Today's high inflation is regressive. This point has been made by many, but I thought some numbers might help. 🧵 #cdnecon Image
I estimate the effect of price increases on household disposable incomes here 👇. The high rates for May (reported today) are like a nearly 10 percent reduction in the disposable incomes of the lowest income families. Let that sink in a moment. Image
This is not because lower-income households buy more items w/ big price increases. The reverse is true (owned accommodation, for example).

Here's a set of estimates of the inflation rate for different types of households based only on differences in products purchased. Image
Read 13 tweets
Mar 16
Today's data: inflation! 📈 CIP increased by 5.7 percent in February compared to one-year earlier; 4.4 percent if energy excluded. www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quoti… #cdnecon
Price increases are also broad based across many product categories. Approximately two in three items within the CPI saw price increases above 3%.
What's behind the acceleration of inflation? Two years ago, the rate was close to 2% (near the target). The increase to 5% is due to just a few items: groceries, gasoline, home depreciation, fuel. Here's an illustration.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 24
This time last year, Alberta was anticipating an $11b deficit for 2022/23. Now, the government expects a surplus of $511 million ($2.3b excluding contingency).

Massive turnaround. Here's a decomposition of the relevant changes. #ableg
There will be two competing stories out there. Both have elements of truth.

1) The government had little to do with the improvement. It's all oil prices.

2) The government's fiscal/economic policies made today's surplus possible.
High oil prices increase both resource revenues and increase corporate income taxes. That's basically the whole ballgame relative to where Budget 2021 was projecting for 2022/23.

Not due to government.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 16
Today's data: inflation! 📈

Average consumer prices in January 2022 were 5.1% higher than a year earlier. Highest since 1991. Excluding energy, prices were 4% higher. www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quoti… #cdnecon
What's behind the accelerating inflation rate? This visual might help. It decomposes the change in inflation due to several important components. Energy prices and household depreciation account for most of the change.
What's homeowners' replace cost (i.e., depreciation)? I explain here: thehub.ca/2022-01-25/mak…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
It's tough to know for sure what the largest tax increase in Alberta history was, but it was not the carbon tax. 🧵🤓 #ableg
First, some context. In Budget 2018 the carbon tax (just the retail levy, since I presume the UCP was not referring to the large-emitter carbon tax, which they support) was projected to be $1.5 billion by 2020/21.

That's approximately 0.4 percent of GDP. In 2017/18, it was 0.3.
I initially thought the largest tax increase would have been found back in Budget 1936 when we brought in a sales tax! That was two percent. Today that would be about 0.6 percent of GDP, so ... larger than than the CTax.
Read 12 tweets
Dec 14, 2021
Remarkable that following such a massive shock, federal debt services costs will average ~1.2 percent of GDP for 2021-2026. Budget 2019, prior to COVID, was projecting debt services costs of 1.2 percent from 2021 onwards.
Those claiming the fiscal sky will soon fall due to this federal borrowing are ... mistaken
Simple illustration: If beyond 2026 we have interest rates ~3 percent & NGDP growth ~4 & revenue/GDP is stable & real per capita spending is stable --> debt/GDP gets to pre-COVID levels by 2034. Far sooner than previous projections.

If spending/GDP is stable, then it's 2038.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(