At @sciencebasedmed this morning, contrary to the false messaging of lawmakers promoting laws criminalizing such care for gender dysphoria and trans adolescents, gender-affirming care is NOT experimental.sciencebasedmedicine.org/gender-affirmi…
I'm going to say it again. The claims by the "gender critical" and by the ideologues promoting laws criminalizing gender-affirming care that such care is "experimental" is straight from the antivax playbook. 2/
Long ago, antivaxxers were claiming that the childhood vaccination schedule is "experimental," or at least "not evidence-based." That was false. 3/ sciencebasedmedicine.org/are-recommende…
Since the #COVID19 pandemic, antivaxxers have been claiming that #CovidVaccines are "experimental," even though they passed phase III clinical trials involving tens of thousands of subjects and now billions of doses have been administered with an excellent safety record. 4/
So, whenever you hear a legislator or the "gender critical" claiming that gender-affirming care is "experimental," remember that this is a tactic that antivaxxers have been using for decades. 5/5

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Gorski, MD, PhD

David Gorski, MD, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gorskon

Jun 6
From the comment section of my blog, here's a lesson on how to determine when someone claiming "I'm not antivax" but just "pro-safety" or "skeptical of some vaccines" is, in fact, antivax, provided in three parts.

Part 1: Ask them a simple question. respectfulinsolence.com/2022/06/03/whe…
Part 2: Await the (predictable) response.
Part 3: Note the refusal to name even a single vaccine the "not antivax" antivaxxer considers safe and effective enough to generally recommend, as well as the pivot to the repetition of antivax tropes, whataboutism, and the weighing of "risks vs. benefits" without a word on how.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 6
Hilariously, Walsh doesn't come off the way he thinks he does in this clip. He comes across like a student who hasn't done the assigned reading but is sufficiently arrogant to think he can challenge the professor.
Also, this professor has the proverbial patience of a saint. It is hilarious to watch him school Makary using the Socratic method, particularly asking Walsh why he is asking the questions he asks. Given his hesitation answering, Walsh must realize that his purpose is dishonest.
Finally, this is the very same playbook science denialists have always used, to trick legitimate academics to appear in their propaganda films. Creationists did it to @RichardDawkins and @pzmyers with “Expelled!” and antivaxxers did it to @DrPaulOffit with “The Greater Good.”
Read 5 tweets
Jun 4
There's nothing that makes me feel old quite like learning that "The Wrath of Khan," a movie I saw in the theater the day it came out and then saw several more times in the theater that summer, is now 40 years old. gizmodo.com/star-trek-ii-w…
I might have to watch it again this weekend. It’s been quite a while since I last did.
Also, it just occurred to me that there’s some irony in my feeling old over this observation. After all, a main plot point of the movie was Kirk’s increasingly feeling his age and regrets over roads not taken, and William Shatner was only 51 when Wrath of Khan was released.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 9
As always, with #COVID19 minimizers/deniers/antivaxxers, it's "civility for thee, but not for me." When called on it, predictably, they always retreat to, "It was tongue-in-cheek," a version of "I was only joking."🙄
I wonder if she'd mind if I started referring to her as part of "Team COVID." After all, it's just "tongue-in-cheek."😉
Again, *they* are free use *any* "tongue-in-cheek" term that they like to dismiss and demonize us, but *perish forbid* that we have the temerity "label" them with *any* term that's the *least* bit derogatory!
Read 4 tweets
Feb 7
What if...and hear me out on this...

Vaccine mandates had *already* been politicized by the right BEFORE the pandemic, and that politicization has only been super turbocharged since #COVID19. It's not as though I wasn't writing about this five years ago and earlier... 1/
For example, from 2017... 2/respectfulinsolence.com/2017/02/22/in-…
Also in 2017, @MIGOP was trying very hard to weaken school vaccine mandates in Michigan... 3/ sciencebasedmedicine.org/make-measles-g…
Read 10 tweets
Jan 26
So I was thinking. Anyone want to start a betting pool to predict the next time @RobertKennedyJr compares vaccines (or #COVID19 public health measures) to the #Holocaust?
There should also be some sort of bonus if the winner predicts an incident where @RobertKennedyJr is forced to issue another insincere apology after an uproar over his bogus #Holocaust analogy.
This one could be the winner, because it would allow @RobertKennedyJr to combine his #Holocaust analogies by applying them to both #CovidVaccine and #autism.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(