Wow, this is going to be good. Hutchinson has first hand knowledge on Trump’s conspiracy to overturn the election. #January6thCommitteeHearings
Hutchinson worked w both Scalise and Ted Cruz b4 working in the Trump WH.
She also acted as Meadows liaison on Capitol Hill.
Chairman Thompson did a good job laying the foundation for questioning demonstrating proximity to conspirators etc.
Rudy G front and center. Hutchinson demonstrates both Rudy and Meadows knew of Jan 6th violence beforehand.
Have a deposition starting at 3 so I’ll thread until about 2:30 if it goes beyond that. #January6thCommitteeHearings
“Dangerous repercussions” - strong testimony thus far from Hutchinson.
Secret Service made the WH aware of potential violence on the 6th. Hutchinson heard the words Oath Keepers and Proud Boys when Rudy G was around.
Hutchinson received call from NSA asking if DCS Ornato knew about potential violence on Jan 6th.
Secret Service also passed on reports of potential violence and weapons being present on Jan. 6th.
Incredible how many weapons equipment confiscated by Secret Service from those who went through the checkpoint.
Secret Service passed on reports of a man w an AR-15 at the ellipse. DCS and Meadows had a convo RE: weapons of all types. Turning flag poles into spears. Nuts.
Meadows didn’t appear to be surprised about weapons being present.
Hutchinson stated that Meadows did nothing RE: weapons being present at ellipse.
Hutchinson was backstage w Trump family during rally. Trump was mad that Sec Ser wasn’t allowing ppl in ellipse w weapons. That they weren’t there to hurt him. Yikes. #January6thCommitteeHearings
“They can march to the Capitol after the rally, take the f’ing mags away….” = seditious conspiracy.
Hutchinson had convos at ellipse w Ornato and Sec Ser stating Capitol doesn’t have enough personnel to defend it.
Hutchinson then went to notify Meadows. Meadows continually ignored her by shutting car door twice. After telling him, meadows had no reaction - seemingly expecting what occurred (more evidence - conspiracy).
Defining SPM and OTR - scheduled movements of POTUS vs off the record movement.
Hutchinson spoke w Cippilone on Jan 3 having Trump going to the Capitol on Jan 6. On Jan 6, Cippilone wanted Hutchinson to ensure Trump going to Capitol that day. - obstructing Justice and Congress - more crimes.
Tons of evidence demonstrating that Trump wanted to be at Capitol Hill on Jan 6th. More evidence of seditious conspiracy and obstruction of Congress.
NSC staff probably losing their mind in attempting to get Trump to Capitol Hill.
ML McCarthy called Hutchinson. Sounding pissed, McCarthy told her not to have Trump come to Capitol.
Secret Service informs Trump that they won’t allow him to go to the Capitol.Ornato met w Hutchinson in his office w leader of Trumps SS detail. Trump loses his mind about not being able to got to Capitol Hill. Trump attempts to grab steering wheel. Trump then attacks Bobby Angle
My God. I didn’t have Trump attacking his SS detail leader on my bingo card.
Trump blames Meadows for not being allowed to go to Capitol Hill.
Trump loses his mind again about AG report finding no evidence of voter fraud. Trump throws ketchup laden plate against wall.
Trump likes to throw dishes and flipping table cloths when he’s angry. What a child.
Hutchison is only 25 years old. Such courage in someone so young. She has drawn the line between Rudy G, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, Meadows, and Trump for seditious conspiracy. Definitely same level testimony as @JohnWDean
And we’re back. Cheney putting Roger Stone in crosshairs.
Stone invoked 5th amendment b4 committee. So did Mike Flynn. Trump pardons Flynn and commuted Stones sentence.
Meadows spoke w Flynn and Stone on Jan 5th. War room at Willard Hotel. Meadows wanted to attend meetings w Rudy G at Hotel. Hutchinson states Meadows shouldn’t go.
Flynn takes fifth when asked if violence on Jan 6th was justified. Takes 5th to question if violence against the US is justified. Hutchinson approaches Meadows on Jan 6th around 2 pm. Asks if he spoke w Jim Jordan, said would give him a call.
Meadows said to Cippilone that he didn’t want to do anything about rioters penetrating the Capitol.
POTUS, Meadows, and Cippilone speaking about “Hang Mike Pence” chant. Trump doesn’t believe there’s anything wrong with the chant. #January6thHearings
“Mike deserves it.” Trump commenting on the “Hang Mike Pence” chant.
“We were watching the Capitol being defaced because of a lie.” #January6thHearings
“Let’s blame ANTIFA” - Meadows initially suggested with others.
SCOTUS just came down w a great decision on 42 USC 1983 claims concering malicious prosecution actions ruling a plaintif need not show an indication of innocence, only their prosecution ended w/o a conviction. See Thompson v. Clark, No. 20–659. @NPAP_NLG@NYSTLA@LegalAidNYC
@NPAP_NLG@NYSTLA@LegalAidNYC Kavanaugh wrote the decision for the Court. Both Roberts and Barrett joined with Sotomayer, Breyer, and Kagan. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch dissented.
This is a big deal. There was a split among the Circuits on this issue. This ruling makes it easier for plaintiff's to prevail on a claim for malicious prosection. X
I’m of two minds with this. Check out Iqbal v Ashcroft 556 US 662 (2009). This matter is often cited for its plausibility standard when alleging facts within a complaint or lawsuit. 1/
Supreme Court blocks Gitmo detainee seeking details on 'black sites' usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
Iqbal was renditioned to a site similar to this. He was held and aggressively interrogated for days bc it was believed he was connected to the 9/11 terrorists. He wasn’t. He was innocent. He wasn’t able to name the individuals in his civil rights - Bivens - 2/
action bc he didn’t know their identity so he named senior members of the Bush admin & John/Jane Does. However, it’s necessary to name the individuals directly responsibly for the constitutional deprivation or malice suffered by Iqbal - 4th amendment in this case 3/
Now that Maxwell has been found guilty of 5 of the 6 charges she faced, what next? Maxwell faces up to 65 years in prison. She was convicted of some of the most 1/
heinous crimes imaginable. I will explain, in general what is going to occur but I will ask that we remember how long it took to bring her and Epstein to justice. Way too long & seemingly involved a degree of corruption imo. Her attorneys will make a motion to set aside /2
the jury verdict. It’s standard procedure and it will be denied. The judge will then set a briefing schedule for sentencing memos from both the prosecution and defendant. These documents will attempt to justify why type of sentence the judge should issue and whether she’ll 3/
This is a good podcast. It summaries the far reaching impact SCOTUS’s recent decision regarding the Texas abortion decision. After reviewing the decision, I’ve come to the conclusion that Gorsuch essentially explains how states can overcome 1/
federal preemption. Federal preemption is where federal law or decision on a particular issue negates a states ability to legislate in a manner contrary to federal action. In this instance, federal law/decision - Stare Decisis - has ruled that a woman has a right to an 2/
abortion. The recent Texas law doesn’t “completely” outlaw abortion but creates a scenario which makes it functionally improbable frustrating the purpose of federal law/intent. It also deputizes civilians to “report on their neighbors” if they undertake an abortion /3
There were two types of subpoenas issued by the @January6thCmte to Meadows. A subpoena for testimony and one for documents. It appears he may have complied with the document subpoena, we don’t know if he fully complied, but not with the one for testimony. 1/
A subject of a subpoena must either fully comply with all of its aspects or seek judicial intervention to limit its scope or quash (love this word) the subpoena in total - nullify it.Failure to do either results in a contempt proceeding - fines & imprisonments. The penalties 2/
can, & usually do, continue until there’s compliance with the subpoena. For example, @xychelsea was imprisoned due to her failure to comply with a grand jury subpoena concerning Assange for the entire term it was seated. If she had agreed to testify, she would have been released.
There's so many emotionally driven "hot takes" regarding the #RittenhouseVerdict As a trial attorney, unless I'm in the room, I respect the jury's verdict. May not like or agree with it, but they were the ones who heard ALL the evidence. KR was able to afford a proper defense.1/
He was able to raise over $500k due to the publicity of the case. Most ppl are unable to do that. There are hundreds, both white & POC alike, of ppl who are force to take bad plea deals or are wrongly convicted bc they had an overwhelmed public defender who was unable to pay 2/
enough attention to their matter. Most ppl live paycheck to paycheck. They can be easily victimized by a judicial system that doesn't have enough time to address their particular circumstances. A good "paid" attorney can compel the system to do just that and make it more 3/