BINGO. Councillor Walcott nails it. Councillors have been asking for more analysis on growth & climate. Walcott: we're just trying to justify something we can't do: greenfield development. Bad for enviro. Will increase citywide GHGs by 1%. More analysis won't change that. #yyccc
Walcott: "If climate's holding you up from this decision—you already have that info. This is +1%. There's no more info that's going to tell you we can be climate-friendly overall net & grow...the q is are you ok with 1% & the benefits that come w 8 new comms? That's the q" #yyccc
A lot of today's #yyccc committee meeting has amounted to councillors preemptively trying to justify/rationalize what they know they can't justify, in light of them declaring a climate emergency last Nov.
Councillor Sharp is trying to move up new comms before November budget—basically fast-tracking them. Walcott opposed. "We don't know what our budget is yet." May save industry time, he says, but increases our risk. Our job is to be caretakers of the city. #yyccc
Councillor Mian echoes Walcott's concerns about Sharp's motion bumping up new comms and circumventing good governance. #yyccc
Fairly regularly in this #yyccc committee meeting the participants are confused on basic points, which makes me feel a little better about struggling to understand what exactly they're trying to do (it's realllly not been clear a lot of the night)
Councillors are still trying to get clarity on what exactly these 8 communities will cost. $5M operating cost from 2023-2026 according to admin, but capital costs are murky. Won't trigger new capital costs, but will "leverage previous capital investments," admin has said. #yyccc
Councillor Spencer is pitching a riff on Sharp's motion. Instead of bumping up all 8 new comms from Nov to Sept, just bump up the 5 recommended by admin + do more analysis on the 3 maybes. Spencer: "This is where I believe we should be moving."
Everyone is confused in this meeting. "I'm really confused." "That was really confusing." #yyccc
Sidenote: I wish one could see how many people are watching the #yyccc livestream at any given time. Are 50 people watching? 500? 5,000? I wonder.
The 13yo upon walking into the kitchen and seeing me still watching #yyccc: "This is why I'm never becoming a journalist"
At this point questions are being asked and answered that have already been asked and answered in this meeting (but why stop now!) #yyccc
We're tripping over ourselves to be business friendly, at the expense of our regulatory role, says @gccarra. Do not support this (moving up approval of 5 new comms from Nov to Sept). #yyccc
Councillor Spencer says if we can get new communities and amenities sooner, good. Time is money. Capital investment doesn't like uncertainty. "These are areas where it makes sense to put people." Established communities can't keep pace with housing demand. Need this. #yyccc
Council's inf + planning committee votes 6-5 to move up approval of 5 new communities from Nov budget time (admin's recommendation) to Sept. Still needs council approval.
I feel like anyone who stays up late to watch #yyccc should be rewarded with early access to the next day's Wordle. When @sprawlcalgary acquires Wordle I'll make it so
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread on urban sprawl and climate in Calgary. Right now #yyccc is looking at 8 potential new communities on city outskirts. Also looking at approving a new climate strategy next Tues. How do these intersect? Let's look at some of the fine print. 1/
Calgary's climate strategy actually downplays the most powerful tool city hall has: regulation. It's at the bottom of the list. Why? Because it's politically unpalatable. The strategy favours education, "capacity building" and softer approaches instead.
From strategy: "Typically, regulations are the most direct way to reduce emissions, but can be politically sensitive to implement quickly. Therefore, The City can use the other approaches to help build support, capacity, buy-in & increased adoption before introducing regulation"
OK, now I'm mad. The newspaper lobby group that administers the Local Journalism Initiative (LJI) has explained why it barred @sprawlcalgary from eligibility for federal funds. It's worse than I thought. THREAD niemanlab.org/2020/05/in-can…#cdnpoli
To recap: the Canadian government is funding reporter salaries for civic journalism as part of the govt's so-called news bailout. A few weeks ago, I shared how criteria had been added to specifically exclude @sprawlcalgary.
Yesterday, @NewsMediaCanada gave its side of the story in a @NiemanLab article. This is the org administering the LJI program for the Canadian government—ostensibly for print AND online media. I'll let you read it.
Soooo the newspaper lobby group administering the Local Journalism Initiative (LJI) for the Canadian government explicitly barred @sprawlcalgary from eligibility for federal funds. Don't know whether to laugh or cry. THREAD
The LJI is part of the Cdn govt's so-called news bailout. It funds reporter salaries for civic journalism—specifically for underserved communities + "areas of news poverty." Indigenous affairs reporters, climate change reporters, education reporters etc. All good stuff. Needed.
For a small startup like the Sprawl, I can't overstate how huge it would be to have a full-time civic journalism reporter whose salary is covered. Would be a gamechanger, making it possible for us to do so much more. Same is true of many small online news orgs in Canada.
This must absolutely be corrected. The idea that "this whole thing started with a lunatic making false claims on Twitter." This is a reference to @karliwithakay's tweet last week, which @shandro and @jkenney used to incite a poor-us pile-on. 1/? #ableg
Read @karliwithakay's tweet for yourself. This is a citizen expressing concern about potential conflict of interest, which is her right—an obligation, even. But UCP types have repeatedly portrayed dissident women as unhinged, crazy, etc. A pattern. #ableg
Shandro has noted that Vital Partners is a brokerage, rather than a health insurance corporation. Okay, fair. But the tweet was not offside and certainly not "lunatic." Frankly we don't know right now how the Shandros will or won't benefit from the minister's decisions. #ableg