1 Love that ur covering #UFOs but saying "drink the spiked kool aid" is more of the same dismissive attitude experiencers have faced for decades. As far as crash retrievals? Many of us realize there's no proof of that but lots of anecdotal smoke, & we wanna c what's in the USAPs.
https://twitter.com/BryanDBender/status/1543707440268472322
2 Many experiencers feel demoralized when they see UFOs finally starting 2B taken seriously but their own experiences r still being ignored. U can't blame them 4 being frustrated. And the folks who took professional risks decades ago are @g_knapp, Puthoff, Davis, Vallee & others.
3 Also doesn't help when mainstream @TomRtweets writes:
"its investigatory elements must follow the facts even where they lead to more boring outcomes."
That goes 4 following the facts, even where they lead to disturbing outcomes, like detailed in, "Skinwalkers @ the Pentagon."
"its investigatory elements must follow the facts even where they lead to more boring outcomes."
That goes 4 following the facts, even where they lead to disturbing outcomes, like detailed in, "Skinwalkers @ the Pentagon."
4 More from Rogan: "the seemingly unsupervised expenditure of millions of dollars in taxpayer money on paranormal matters by contractors such as Robert Bigelow must no longer be considered acceptable."
Well, IMO & the opinion of others, UFOs are connected to paranormal matters.
Well, IMO & the opinion of others, UFOs are connected to paranormal matters.
5 Who's going to follow the evidence no matter where it leads? Bigelow & his team were willing to do that. Does Tom have an alternative way that we can study that apparent, troubling connection? Should we bury our heads in the sand, again, like we have for so many years on UFOs?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
