BREAKING: Judges, army officers and bureaucrats release a statement against the observations made by #SupremeCourtOfIndia in #NupurSharma’s case. It notes "Such an approach of the Supreme Court deserves no applause and impacts the very sanctity and honour of the Highest Court.”
The statement, having over 100 signatories, notes that “Recent comments by the two judges of the #SupremeCourtOfIndia have surpassed the Laxman Rekha and compelled us to issue an open statement.”
According to the statement, the observations of #SupremeCourt in #NupurSharma ’s case have “have sent shockwaves in the country and outside. The observations, simultaneously relayed by all news channels in high decibel, are not in sync with judicial ethos.”
It has been remarked that “By no stretch these observations, which are not part of the order, can be justified as judicial propriety and fairness .” #SupremeCourt#NupurSharma
According to the statement, “#NupurSharma is adjudged guilty in a proceeding where this was not an issue at all”
It has further been conveyed that, “ By such observation there is virtual exoneration of the cruel beheading at #Udaipur in broad daylight."
According to the statement, “Legal fraternity is bound to be surprised and shocked at the observation that an FIR should lead to arrest. The observations on other agencies in the country, without notice to them, are worrisome and alarming.”
It has been noted that, “the unfortunate comments have are indelible scar of the largest democracy. Urgent rectification steps are called for as these have potentially serious consequences on democratic values and security of the Country.”
According to the statement “The observations, judgmental in nature, on issues not before the Court, are crucification of the essence and spirit of the Indian Constitution."
It has been stated that, “The observations are too serious to be overlooked if rule of law, democracy has to sustain and blossom and deserve to be recalled."
According to the statement, “#SupremeCourt,refused to take cognizance of the Petition and forced #NupurSharma to withdraw the Petition and approach appropriate forum (High Court) knowing fully well that High Court does not have jurisdiction to transfer or club the FIRs”
The statement has been signed by 15 retired judges, 77 former bureaucrats and 25 army veterans.
Retired Judges, Bureaucrats & Army Veterans Release Statement Against Supreme Court’s Oral Observation In Nupur Sharma’s Case @sai_prasad_law reports lawbeat.in/top-stories/re…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: Advocate Jaya Sukin writes to AG KK Venugopal for consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Justice (retd) SN Dhingra, Senior Advocates Aman Lekhi and Rama Kumar for the statements on #SupremeCourt’s oral observations in #NupurSharma’s case.
The letter refers to Justice Dhingra’s statement on the observations of #SupremeCourt in #NupurSharma’s in an interview to India TV on July 2, 2022 and Senior Advocates Aman Lekhi and Rama Kumar statements in a legal news portal called Verdictum on July 1, 2022
According to the letter, the statements, has caused irreparable injuries to Indian Judiciary and the Nation by un parliament statements and derogatory remarks and hence falls within the scope of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Gyanvapi dispute | #VaranasiCourt to resume hearing on the plea challenging maintainability of the suit filed by 5 Hindu women devotees for performance of all rituals of Hindu deities within the Gynavapi complex. #GyanvapiHearing#Gyanvapi
The hearing is to take place before District and Sessions Judge Dr. AK Vishvesha. Counsel for Muslim parties is likely to continue his arguments. #GyanvapiHearing#Gyanvapi
Parties to the case and respective counsel have reached the courtroom, however, Judge Dr. AK Vishvesha is yet to arrive.
Media entry is barred inside the courtroom as was on earlier dates of hearings too. #GyanvapiHearing#Gyanvapi
Justice Pardiwala, judge, #SupremeCourt today delivered keynote address on the topic “Vox Populi Vs Rule of Law.” He said “Balancing the intent of the majority populace on one hand and meeting the demand, of affirming the rule of law, is a difficult exercise.”
Justice Pardiwala said “I firmly believe that there is no exception to the rule of law. The rule of law must prevail.I believe that it is for the highest court of this country, to decide any issue, keeping only one thing in my. That is the rule of law.”
Justice Pardiwala said “The judicial verdict cannot be the reflection of the influence of public opinion.”
Former Delhi High Court Judge Justice SN Dhingra has stated in an interview that the comments made by the vacation bench that Nupur Sharma’s comment resulted in the outcome of the unfortunate incident in Udaipur was “irresponsible” (India TV)
“It is irresponsible because it has prejudiced the case of Nupur Sharma in all subordinate courts... Making such an observation without any probe, or hearing of witnesses or hearing Nupur Sharma’s arguments is not only illegal, but also improper”: Justice SN Dhingra
“Even the Supreme Court is not above law. Before making such observation against a person (Nupur Sharma), the normal procedure is that charges should have been framed and both the prosecution and defendant should have been allowed to have their say”: Justice SN Dhingra
Chief Justice of India, Justice NV Ramana, was felicitated by Association of Indo Americans . He said “With some sense of regret I must say that we still haven’t learnt to appreciate wholly the roles and responsibilities assigned by the Constitution to each of the Institutions”
Breaking: CJI says “The party in power believes that every Governmental action is entitled to judicial endorsement. The parties in opposition expect the judiciary to advance their political positions and causes”
CJI says “This flawed thinking of all hues flourishes in the absence of proper understanding among people about the Constitution and the functioning of the democratic institutions.”
BREAKING: Alt News Co-founder #MohammedZubair produced before the Patiala House Court. He was remanded to police custody for 4 days. He has been produced in the court after completion of the period.
Public Prosecutor asks for extension of the remand, as accused has not cooperated in the investigation.
Vrinda Grover, Advocate for #MohammedZubair : The phone that they have seized is not from the time when the tweets are. Copy of remand application has not been given
PP: #MohammedZubair has formatted his phone and deleted applications from his phone.