LawBeat Profile picture
Jul 12 9 tweets 6 min read
🚨Gyanvapi case | #VaranasiCourt to resume hearing on the plea challenging maintainability of the suit filed by 5 Hindu women for performance of all rituals of Hindu deities within the Gynavapi complex.
#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi
Hearing before the court of District and Sessions Judge Dr. AK Vishvesha was scheduled to take place at 2pm, however, a delay was caused due to unknown reasons.
#gyanvapi
Hearing starts. Counsel for the Muslim side is to place his legal arguments against the maintainability of the suit.
#gyanvapi #gyanvapihearing
Media entry is barred inside the courtroom as earlier hearings, however, the security has been beefed up. Appx 7-8 SI and more than 50 police constables are present inside the court premises today.
#gyanvapi #gyanvapihearing
Counsel for the Muslim side is continuing his arguments. On the last date of hearing, after finishing up reading the plaint by Hindu side, he had told media that he will submit legal points, rulings to establish that suit by Hindu side is not maintainable.
#gyanvapihearing
Today's hearing concludes. Muslim side has completed its arguments. Next date fixed for tomorrow, July 13th.

Adv. Vishnu Shankar Jain, appearing for the Hindu devotees, briefs media about their objections to the arguments raised by opposite parties.
#gyanvapi #gyanvapihearing
Muslim side has concluded its argument including factual as well as legal points. In legal points, they relied upon the Places of Worship Act, Waqf Act, and other laws to state that the instant suit is not maintainable:Adv. Anupam Dwivedi informs
#gyanvapihearing
From Hindu side, plaintiff number 2 to 5 started their arguments today which will resume tomorrow at 2 pm. Regarding Places of Worship Act, it's their contention that ascertaining religious character of place is barred nowhere: Adv. Anupam Dwivedi
#gyanvapihearing
Gyanvapi Dispute | Muslim Side Completes Arguments On Maintainability Of Suit By Hindu Devotees
@ISalilTiwari reports
lawbeat.in/top-stories/gy…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

Jul 12
BREAKING: While acquitting 13 RSS workers embroiled in murder case of a CPI(M) worker, Kerala High Court has found that the prosecution attempted to tutor witnesses, collect evidence and form a scripted story. Court has found that there is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE worth its salt
Kerala High Court has WHOLLY reversed trial court order convicting 13 RSS workers in murder case of a CPI(M) worker, sentencing all to life imprisonment. HC has found that that witnesses are CLEARLY TUTORED, who go on a TIRADE OF EMBELLISHMENTS, about what transpired.
"There is a deliberate attempt visible, from the commencement of the investigation, to project half-truths and cherry-pick witnesses so as to shape the case in a particular manner": Kerala High Court acquits 13 RSS Workers in CPI(M) man murder case
Read 5 tweets
Jul 12
#SupremeCourt to hear plea filed by Additional Director General of Police of the Anti Corruption Bureau and Karnataka Government seeking direction to remove remarks made by Justice HP Sandesh alleging, he was threatened to be transfered.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submits that the apprehension may be right, and may wrong, let this be taken by the Chief, the first court.

CJI NV Ramana: There was speaking order also?
SG Mehta: Yes Milords, despite telling that the matter will come up before the Supreme Court.

CJI Ramana: Let's wait for the order.

SG Mehta: Milords, there will be another order and we'll be waiting for that.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 12
#SupremeCourt to hear plea challenging amendments to Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act and Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats, Industrial Townships Act.
Earlier, the Court had directed the Maharashtra State Election Commission to notify the elections for local bodies in two weeks.
Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a letter has been circulated, a report has been supplied to us we require a week's time.

SG Tushar Mehta: Milords, the urgency is that the elections are going to be held in sometime.
Read 13 tweets
Jul 12
📍Additional Sessions Judge in Delhi will hear bail plea of Mohammed Zubair shortly. Zubair has been accused of hurting religious sentiments and criminal conspiracy, receiving funds illegally from abroad. Bail was rejected on July 2 by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
(Pic: ANI)
Case taken up.
Advocate Grover for Zubair: Grover: This is an FIR under sec. 153A, 295A IPC. Thereafter some sections were added sec. 201, 120B of IPC and sec. 35 of FCRA.
Grover arguing for Zubair’s bail, tells court that the Tweet in question is image is of a 1983 movie by Rishikesh Mukherjee and that the image is a screenshot of that movie, “Kisi se na kehna”.
Read 15 tweets
Jul 12
#SupremeCourt will today hear a plea by Alt news co-founder #MohammedZubair challenging the order of Allahabad High Court refusing to quash an FIR lodged against him over his tweet allegedly calling 3 Hindu seers as ’hate mongers’
On the last date of hearing, the #SupremeCourt had granted an interim bail to #MohammedZubair in the ‘hate monger’ tweet case

lawbeat.in/top-stories/su…
Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv: The vacation court issued notice in this matter a few days ago.

ASG Raju: I am led by the Ld.SG. I would like to file a status report or counter. He is already protected.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 11
#Breaking
Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind moves Gujarat High Court against Gujarat govt's order mandating learning of Bhagvad Gita compulsory in schools.
@SukritiMishra12 reports
@JamiatUlama_in
While refusing to entertain Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind’s request for a stay on the resolution’s implementation, a division bench of Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh J Shastri sought the State government’s reply by August 18, 2022.
lawbeat.in/top-stories/gu…
Before the bench, counsel for Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind expressed concern that educating students in only one religion would indoctrinate young impressionable minds with the superiority of one religion over others, affecting the exercise of free choice and conscience.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(