We need to talk about freedom I think. It's the lead weight in the Covid saddlebags. A🧵on why Daniel Defoe may be the weapon we need to fight those who won't fight Covid. /1 #auspol#covid19aus
Watching the UK leadership race reminded me of all the same core beliefs the current political class have used to also undermine Covid action. Every Tory lining up to replace Boris pledges to 'free' people from the tyranny of the State. /2
This is the core belief that has shaped our politics globally for over 50 years. That States and their regulations and taxes 'restrict freedom'. You need to challenge this core belief, because the slaves to this belief are easily replaced, if you only attack the person. /3
The neoliberal/libertarian framework says the default state of society is as a collection of free individuals. Governments and their laws then restrict this freedom, and must be either removed or gutted, to restore it. Very few go back to basics and challenge this core belief. /4
But Defoe had already done it for us, over 300 years ago. With Robinson Crusoe. Place a person outside the restrictions of society the libertarians so hate, and what happens? They have no freedom at all. Crusoe labours constantly to recreate the society he's lost. /5
It's exhausting, all-consuming work, never-ending. To have any sort of freedom to live at all, Crusoe has to reproduce all of the social things back at home, all by himself. The default state of human society IS the social relationships we have, including government. /6
The libertarians have it inside-out and back-to-front. To have any sort of freedom at all, you need to engineer an enormous number of social ties, regulations, processes. Without them Crusoe would have been dead inside a week. /7
Unsurprisingly, what makes us free is the economies of scale we get by working together with others, to free up any space at all for us to be individuals. Without that shared work, we're Crusoe, labouring all day to just survive. /8
It's amazing really that this even has to be said, and that the libertarian alternative of 'freedom' wasn't just a laughing stock from the moment it was invented. What libertarians mean by freedom is free-LOADING, off that social labour of others. /9
They want the luxury of individual choice without the collective work of creating it. But this isn't just about work, it's also about psychology. Many are surprised people don't choose to wear masks, in a pandemic, if it's left to their choice. /10
Defoe makes that easy to understand. Our default state is as social animals, not individuals. We will do what others do, we imitate others. Without a change being led into existence, people will do nothing and copy others doing nothing. Nobody wants to rock the boat. /11
Regulations, social rules, BRING freedom by allowing individuals to act in ways that go beyond the peer pressure of social imitation. Nobody has to make anybody else uncomfortable socially, they can all say 'hey, it's the law'. /12
Libertarians have a rat cunning I think and know this. It's why many of them don't actually believe removing tax and regulation means freedom for anybody much except themselves. It's just a useful propaganda tool to sell support for their freeloading. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Australia (and the world) will never escape this pandemic until we abandon our root strategy, to 'minimise severe disease'. That's a hospital management strategy, or as I call it, a public disease (rather than public health) strategy. /2
It directly causes the infection of the entire population, over and over. It makes the public sick, potentially permanently. A total collapse and failure of public health responsibilities, we don't manage any other infectious disease in this way,.../3
These protesters demand freedom from public health action, which they see as a type of tyranny. But humans are social animals, nobody really wants freedom. All humans form hierarchies, even scientists, shaped by what the group in question values. /1
These protesters a clear case in point. They’re a coordinated group, with shared values and aims. Despite what they say and maybe even think, they’re not after freedom from being told what to do. They want to be told what to do by *somebody else*. /2
Like Trump’s freedom warriors. They’re not after freedom, they’re desperate to follow somebody. Trump. We have to replace the stupid libertarian idea that the default state of society is free individuals. The default state is social groups, who want to be led, guided. /3
Richard Glover yesterday was pining for the days when political opponents could be bipartisan. We need to challenge the Pollyanna view of politics we have in the West I think, to understand why it looks like a toilet right now. #auspol
For 70 years we’ve had the politics of privilege, and mistaken that for politics. There’s rarely much need for politics if you’re privileged, because there’s enough wealth and freedom to paper over the differences between people. Nobody is really fighting for survival. /2
So all of that lovely bipartisanship we grew up with, the politics where we could not pay much attention at all except occasionally at elections, was really hiding fault-lines in our societies. Division is a key concept, because it has two different but related meanings. /3
I’ve Tweeted about how the apparent disregard for the health of populations shown now by governments is entirely consistent with working people being treated as we treat livestock. This isn’t an animal rights thing (though it is that too), nor just a colourful analogy. /1
When we replaced geographical territorial concepts like regions and nations with the idea of an abstract global ‘market’, at the same time we removed all personalised characteristics of the people who occupied those old territories. We now treat local workers the same way…/2
…we’ve always treated imported workers, and before that slaves. All interchangeable work units, from anywhere, globally in the global market. No need to take extra care of your workers if you can import fresh, cheaper labour from overseas. But back to culls. /3
‘Capitalism’, ‘communism’, ‘authoritarianism’ are lazy concepts. Societies share so many characteristics, just called different things. Take the idea of a ‘planned economy’, compared to a ‘free market’ economy. /1
The central planning of an ‘authoritarian’ society is mirrored almost exactly by large corporates in market economies. We’ve seen how they increasingly take over entire supply chains, to get greater control over the ‘market’. ‘Home brand’ products are this. /2
Another way we’ve been infected by libertarian ideas is our gut reaction to this as somehow bad. That ‘big business’ is corrupt, scale is bad, let’s all worship small businesses. But big business emerges when you have small government. There’s a certain amount of coordination…/3
Longish quote about Marek's Diseases in chickens in next few Tweets, and then I wanted to ask those who understand vaccines if the Covid vaccines are 'leaky' in this same way, with the same possible consequences? (Thanks to @iko_iko11 and Wikipedia). /1 #COVID19Aus
"Under normal conditions, highly virulent strains of the virus are not selected for by evolution. This is because such a severe strain would kill the host before the virus would have an opportunity to transmit to other potential hosts and replicate. Thus, less virulent..."/2
"...strains are selected. These strains are virulent enough to induce symptoms but not enough to kill the host, allowing further transmission. However, the leaky vaccine changes this evolutionary pressure and permits the evolution of highly virulent strains." /3