Benni McCarthy: "Tik Tok, Instagram, and Twitter seem to be far more important to these guys. Their image matters more than being the best player you can be.
What are image rights and how do they work in football, #rugby & #cricket?
This is image rights explained
THREAD 🧵
In 1995, Arsenal bought Denis Bergkamp and David Platt
Both players had existing non-UK image rights companies and contracts. Arsenal entered into playing contracts with both players personally, and image-rights contracts with the two players’ image rights companies
📸Getty
UK tax authorities later enquired into the image rights arrangements due to the “tax loss” caused by image rights payments falling outside the charge to income tax.
Ultimately,the courts found in favour of Platt and Bergkamp and that began the boom in sports image rights.
But what are image rights?
Image rights means the ability of a person to exclusively control the commercial use of their name, physical/pictorial image, reputation, identity, voice, personality, signature, initials or nickname in advertisements, marketing and all forms of media
Image rights are also known by different names and subject to different legal treatment in different jurisdictions. In the United Kingdom, they are known as image rights; in continental Europe, as personality rights; and in the United States as publicity rights
Like in most other countries, there is no specific protection of image rights in South Africa. Such rights are generally protected in terms of the common law protection which includes Copyright Act and Trademarks act 194 of 1993.
Sports entities use intellectual property to protect image rights and uses this to further exploit commercial opportunities.
There are generally three main way sports athletes uses to exploit commercial image rights
Sponsorship – corporate brands pay athletes money or products in exchange for them using the athletes image for marketing purposes.
These athletes could be asked to exclusively wear branded clothing and equipment. Or appear in advertising
📸Puma
It's important to note that not all sponsorship comes with a cash payment.
Some sponsorship can be value in kind or merchandise to the value of an agreed upon amount.
Moving on
Merchandising – this is where the athletes’ own image rights and standing is used to create personal range of a products. Merchandising is often given to mega stars because it generally requires resource investment into growing brands and image and trade mark catalogue
📸Getty
Endorsement – is normally where athletes influence or recommend a certain products of a particular brand which sponsors him/her. This is done to increase brand awareness and sales of a product.
Commonly, an athlete would register an image rights company (IRC) which would manage the use of a players image.
These companies can be registered anywhere and its common for players to register IRC's in tax havens
Structure of an IRC from Lexology ⬇️
In most European countries, the player or his/manager negotiate for image rights separately from the standard playing contract.
There are players who's image is far more valuable than their on-pitch performance
📸Getty
Image rights prevent the exploitation of a players image without compensation to a player
Players have to make themselves available for PR, Marketing, Community, Promotional for a certain hour a week or month
In turn players are paid according to an agreed-upon payment schedule
Image rights agreements also protect the club from ambush marketing.
They impose limit on the use of player’s image in with brands that may be in direct competition with those of the club.
This doesn't always work to plan as players move often and clashes occur
Players and clubs can often find themselves in trouble for tax evasion by abusing image rights.
Messi was found guilty of defrauding Spain of €4.1m between 2007 and 2009. He used tax havens in Belize and Uruguay to conceal earnings from image rights.
📸Getty
An example from rugby, Saracens were relegated due to breaches including paying players through other companies and over inflating image rights.
As related to one player Saracens over-valued their 30% stake in the Image Rights Company of Maro Itoje by over £800,000
📸Getty
So how do image rights work in South African Football, Rugby, Cricket?
Football
At the moment the SAFA and PSL standard contract does not cover player’s image rights. Even the National Soccer League (NSL) and SAFA rules and regulation does not cover player image rights
Therefore, FIFA rules are used as default.
It states:
“The Club and the Player have to agree how then Player’s image rights are exploited, if applicable ---
-- As a recommendation and principle the individual player may exploit his rights by himself (if not conflicting with club’s sponsors/partners) whilst the Club may exploit the Player’s image rights as part of a group and/or the whole squad”
FIFA 2008.
Most players image rights are held and managed by their club. This is because the majority of players just don't have big brands off the pitch and wouldn't warrant the registration of a separate image rights company.
What is paid for image rights on SA football are signing-on fees.
They are paid to a player upon the transfer of that player from one Club registered with the PSL, to another Club either registered with the PSL, or to a professional side recognized by FIFA
Rugby
In S A rugby, the image rights belong to South Africa Rugby Union (SARU). In 2016, SARU, The South African Rugby Employers Organisation (SAREO), Provinces (unions/clubs) and the South African Rugby Player’s Association (SARPA) reached on image rights
📸Gallo
SARU bought the rights for an amount in the region of R65 million for a period of five years. According to SARU annual report (2021), the image rights increased from R55 million in 2020 to R73 million in 2021. The report further reported that SARU spent around 6 % on image rights
There are exceptions. Players such as Siya Kolisi are said to control their rights
In 2020, South Africa rugby magazine reported that Springbok flanker Pieter-Steph du Toit agreed with Western-Province to have full control of image rights
📸Citadel
Cricket
South African cricket uses similar method to that of rugby. A collective agreement was entered into by Cricket South Africa (CSA), the South African Cricketers’ Association (SACA) and Franchises/Clubs.
That about wraps it up.
Big shout out to @MahlomolaMartin for the research help with this one.
If you've gotten this far, thanks for reading. If you like this type of work, please follow us and share our work to your network
Cheers and enjoy the weekend
🤙🏾
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A total of almost $8.5 million is up for grabs this year.
World Athletics has set aside $2 million from fines paid by the Russian Athletics Federation for violating rules on doping, to add to the prize money for the Oregon Championships
Aside from this, there will be an extra incentive for athletes to set new records.
Japanese electronics company TDK is handing out $100,000 each to gold medal winners who break an IAAF World Record in the process.
Teams across the globe are launching elaborate campaigns with some of their best players, models and even fans of the club to showcase their new strips
Football jerseys are a big deal and are now even the subject of dinner date attire debates
So how does it work?
In a nutshell, kit deals are similar to licensing deals. The kit manufacturers such as Nike, Adidas and Puma pay the club a certain fee to supply the football team with kits, and to use the club’s colours and badge to sell replica shirts.
SABC Takes SuperSport Matter To Competition Commission
SABC reportedly has lodged a complaint against SuperSport and various sporting organisations in South Africa, accusing them of "anticompetitive and exclusionary behaviour" and asking that punitive fines be imposed
It is claimed that SABC views SuperSport as having "abused its dominance in sports broadcasting to impede the SABC’s ability to compete with its own standalone sports channel."
The complaint deals specifically with SuperSport’s sub-licensing restrictions, which prevent the SABC from broadcasting sub-licensed games on direct-to-home satellite or online streaming platforms.
Greek League Tops List Of Football Payments Default List
Fifpro has warned footballers about “systematic and widespread contractual violations” in football, singling out Algeria, China, Greece, Libya, Romania, Saudi Arabia and Turkey as countries where these risks are high.
FIFPRO said non-payment of salaries was also a recurring problem for players in Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Romania and Turkey while second-division clubs in Greece often cease operations without honouring debts.
Greek clubs in the country owed more than €25 million in unpaid wages
Two years ago, Fifpro and world federation FIFA said up a fund to help compensate players, who have fallen victim to their clubs running into financial problems. This year the fund is worth $4 million
Sparkling Water, the #HollywoodbetsDurbanJuly champion horse, secured a R5 million prize purse on a weekend that was expected to generate close to R362 million in economic activity
So is it a great industry to get into? This is the business of owning race horses
THREAD ⬇️
While legendary trainer Mike De Kock saddled his fifth winner of the July and jockey S’Manga Khumalo fizzed to his second victory at the annual race, the horse Sparkling Water has a much longer history behind her.
📸 Gallo
Sparkling Water is owned by Mary Oppenheimer-Slack, the daughter of former Anglo American chairman Harry Oppenheimer and was sired by one of the most legendary race horses in South African history, Silvano.
Sparkling Water is the latest in a long line of breeder successes
The 1995 World Cup in South Africa generated R197 million (£30.3 million) in revenues. World Cup revenues have spiked over the years, peaking at £381.4 million in 2019.
The IRB runs a four year business revenue cycle and relies on the World Cup for 80% of its revenue during that period.
The 1995 World Cup in South Africa generated R197 million (£30.3 million )in total revenue which increased by 131% to £70 million in 1999 when Wales hosted.
Revenues peaked at £381.4 million when Japan hosted the 2019 World Cup with nearly £4.3billion generated in economic output according to The Economic Impact of Rugby World Cup 2019 report published by EY.