Nick Meacham Profile picture
Jul 17 26 tweets 6 min read
So @Apple and @MLS joined forces in what could be one of the most intriguing + disruptive media deals the sports industry has seen. 10 years $2.5bn guaranteed. But there's more to it than just the $bn price tag.
It's a long one, but here's a thread on it:
🧵👇
What is it?

•10 Year global, exclusive streaming rights deal
•Every Match will be available live (previously regional blackouts)
•Mainly english only with some spanish and french in certain markets
•Served on Apple TV app as a special MLS dedicated subscription product (not just part of Apple+) (app within an app - Important - will cover why shortly
•Some matches will be free in AppleTV+, but most will be via the new paid subscription service
•It will also include original programming, highlights and wider news coverage
•Any linear deals would be non-exclusive with the Apple platform
Let's look at the financials:
•Previous rights cycle for US rights generated $90m annually but included some National matches, and Linear rights
•This deal $250m global per annum (streaming only)
•$250m number is a minimum guarantee - not a rights fee.
•MLS has been guaranteed an income annually, which will increase once the subscription platform surpasses certain targets.
•Does not include any linear. Does not include the USSF rights for internationals.
ESPN is in talks w/ MLS about a potential linear deal. (per reports)
•Production costs will now sit with the MLS. Cannot be understated that doing all this internally is a big project.
Equally not unprecedented for a major league to do this (e.g. Premier League and The Bundesliga do it). Means a hefty chunk of their income will go to production
How did we get here:
•The MLS made a decision a number of years ago that it would set itself up for this possibility, lining up its media rights to all expire at the same time, including the regional deals that existed in local markets
•This strategy by the MLS was likely a catalyst for them to pull the trigger on going in on sport.
•This is a unique position for a major sports property as rights are typically extremely fragmented with their rights and rights cycles, aiding discoverability and revenues...
... but crippling the top tier fans experience of the sport. The MLB for example has 8 different broadcast partners in the US alone, as well as it’s MLB Streaming rights, RSN partnerships and more.
Why did they do it?
•For the MLS: they get one of the most powerful tech companies backing their growth. They get someone who has a direct relationship with consumers that knows everything about them - better than the user does itself.
•For both parties it could be a case of circumstance – MLS didn’t get the finances they were after from the incumbents, and Apple would have loved the opportunity to pull of a deal that is void of the usual restrictions that exist with the fragmented rights market.
•For Apple: making a major move in sports has been long expected after Amazon Sports head Jim DeLorenzo joined 2 years ago.
Worth noting Jim likely led on the ATP + Amazon deal in 2019 - a global, exclusive streaming deal for a major set of rights from the tennis property
•Their recent MLB deal was seen as a ‘toe-dip’, and now they're set up to continue spending on rights that 'matter', including the much talked about NFL 'Sunday Ticket' package.
•More importantly NBA rights are up soon, and could be a huge carrot for Apple given the scale
•Apple has shown a history of being patient rather than needing to be first movers.
•Important to note though the spend on these rights will be less than 9% of their spend on original content in 2023 per @AmpereAnalysis
•For Apple, it provides an opportunity to test all its strategic and technological capabilities so that they're able to create a case to any rights holder they'd like to partner with.
•This relationship is completely unique to anything we've seen, at least at this scale.
What's the risk?
•Apple has 5.6% of total SVOD Market share (per just watch)
•Will discoverability be an issue? AppleTV is a fairly closed platform, meaning the work of major broadcasters to create awareness will be missing.
•At a time where MLS is on the rise, is this move a risk to its growth, whilst other Soccer leagues like LaLiga and EPL cash in on the support of major players like ESPN and NBC to amplify their product?
•or is the uniqueness of this deal the home run they believe it to be?
•And of course financially this is a drop in the ocean for Apple.

What makes it so special?
•It's Apple's first big move in sports and marks them as a serious player from here on for sports rights
•They will have major sports knocking on their door to discuss how they can partner.
•Apple TV could act as a super aggregator of sports D2C platforms (i.e. F1TV or GamePass) , or JV style partnerships as in the case with the MLS due to how they'll present the product
•It could reset the way media rights deals are done, given it’s part minimum guarantee, part shared upside. Not a straight up fee. It's more of a licensing deal if you compare it the traditional deal formats
•Apple is building out their sports ecosystem. They recently launched a new set of features dedicated to improving access to sports news, highlights and content. This will be a big driver for them to push users of this new product to things like the MLS app.
•Given they own the phone, they can use this in ways unseen by other traditional broadcast partners. This is perhaps the most exciting part.
sportspromedia.com/categories/bro…
•Apple can push subs + content as hard as they like. And costs to market the product will be negligible due to it being their own platform
Overall this deal, isn’t the one with the biggest price tag, but it just might disrupt the entire way this industry looks at broadcasting
If you want to hear more about this, then listen in to our weekly #StreamTimePod, where we discuss all things streaming in sports, including this deal in a recent episode:
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/str…
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/6V4AOXgDQ…
Others: podfollow.com/streamtime-pod…
And check out this great breakdown and explainer by @MickeyCaskill who gives his take on it: sportspromedia.com/analysis/mls-a…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Meacham

Nick Meacham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SportsProNick

Jul 15
What @dazngroup was when it first came to the market was a simplified single price subs offering looking to be first movers and disrupt the sports media world.

Fast forward to 2022 and now they're rolling out multi-tier pricing, prioritising distribution deals...
1/4 👇
and launching NFT's and Betting integrations on their platform in a bid to bridge the economic gap they were facing between rights costs and subscribers.

Each day they're acting more and more like a conventional broadcaster.

2/4
No-one in media has made the simplified pricing model work, and sadly it's been an expensive learning curve for many - including DAZN.

In this weeks #StreamTimePod, @SportsProChris1 and I talk about the changes they've made specifically in the Spanish market, and loads more
3/4
Read 4 tweets
Apr 27
Across day 1 at #SPL22, priorities and challenges for sports properties seems to be overwhelmingly consistent across the board. #Data, owned platforms (O&O), content creation.
Here's a thread with some points I've picked up:
🧵
1) Audience data and the drive to know more about the fan. No-one seems to be happy with what they have. Is this complete picture of their fan idealistic over realistic? Seems everyone has different holes they're trying to plug.
2) It's unclear everyone knows what the 'complete' fan data picture actually looks like, or even just what they think is missing from their data mix right now.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 20
FIFA+ launched recently, stirring reaction from the industry, media and fans from across the globe.
So what is it? What's it not? Why do it? What are some of the objectives? How will it be powered? How will it be funded?

Here's a thread with some of the details + thoughts: 🧵👇
What will be available:
- 40,000 live games per year
- 11,000 women's matches
- starting w/ 1400 live games streamed month 1.
- 2000 hours of archive content
- in 11 languages by year end
- an array of original content/ series
- data + news
from across the globe
Access:
- free to watch
- optional registration to aid personalisation
- haven't ruled out payment features for content in the future.
- aiming for over 200m+ (!) unique users by end of 2022
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(