1/ I talk a lot about the cooling effects of street trees and green infrastructure during heatwaves, but one of the best ways of mitigating against high daytime temperatures is reducing high nighttime temperatures.
Let's talk about that.
2/ Concrete, tarmac, and other hard and synthetic materials - think the astroturf pitch (car tyre dump) or plastic play surfacing your Council recently installed - accumulate heat throughout the day and do not begin to release it until the external temperature begins to fall.
3/ Hard, man-made surfaces therefore turn cities into giant storage heaters, and this has a magnifying effect on the follow day's temperatures. Many studies have explained this effect, which can alter local nighttime temps by 17-25% (Ibsen et al, 2022). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35306078/
4/ So, how can we reduce the 'storage heater effects' of hard surfaces in cities? Actually, it's quite simple, if not necessarily easy because of the vested interests of those who benefit from keeping things the way they are.
We need to *cover and eliminate*.
5/ By "cover", I mean we need to shade as much of the hard surfacing that stores the heat as possible. This means achieving a *minimum* of 40% on street tree canopy cover, because that's the level beyond which temperatures really start to fall (Ziter et al, 2019).
6/ *But*, trees are not the only ways to provide shade in cities, building dense, medium height housing with narrow walkways *alongside* green infrastructure can have a huge impact, as can green roofs, and innovative, playful-even, interventions such as awnings.
7/ By "eliminate", what I mean is that we need to steadily REMOVE concrete, steel, and glass surfaces from our cities and DISPLACE them from new projects using construction materials that cool our cities, such as cross-laminated timber, which will also decarbonise construction.
8/ But, of course, the short-run ability to transform the built environment of our cities by turning them into timber-framed carbon sinks is, well, challenging to say the least, so what can we do in the meantime?
Well, it turns out quite a lot actually.
9/ That's why I started breaking the ground in Hackney with the largest depaving programme in the U.K. By removing space for cars - which also add 1C to our cities - and replacing plastic play surfacing with greenery, we can start tackling the Urban Heat Island effect of today.
10/ So, that's my thread about how we can implement cheap, practical measures today to reduce nighttime temperatures, the Urban Heat Island effect, and heatwaves tomorrow.
And if your council won't listen, remember that your first duty is to our children. #tacticalurbanism
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ So, you fill your watering can with tap/grey water - provided it's colder than the room temperature (which is very likely) then you go around the house and water your plants *with terracotta pots* until the soil is thoroughly wet.
That's when the magic happens.
3/ The water inside the plant pot is then absorbed by the naturally porous terracotta and drawn to the outer surface, evaporation at then not only releases the already cooled water in its gaseous state, but cools it further via the transition from liquid to gas.
1/ Over the past decade I’ve gone through all the stages of mourning associated with the global warming-induced collapse of the environmental systems that make human civilisation possible, so here are my top tips for getting through periods of extreme ‘climate weirding’.
2/ As soon as you’ve finished reading this important public service announcement 😉, get off social media. It’s full of fatalistic people saying we can’t do anything about our dire environmental circumstances - we can - because they don’t have the imagination or guts to do so.
3/ In fact, log off the internet altogether. Scrolling through @bbcweather or the @metoffice on ‘heatwave watch’ will make you feel worse. Guaranteed. If fear and anxiety could solve global warming, I’d have done the job years ago. At this stage, Monday is what it is.
🧱 The built environment represents 40% of U.K emissions, but the #Treasury's approach to the decarbonisation of this sector is an object lesson in how a lack of joined-up thinking is taking us away from our legally-binding #netzero carbon commitments.
🔨It can take between 10 and 80 years for a new, energy-efficient building to offset the emissions created during the construction process.
💷 But the U.K tax system militates against low carbon retrofit and upgrades to existing buildings by levying 20% VAT on renovations, while zero-rating new build homes. This means it often makes more financial sense to demolish and rebuild, rather than preserve and upgrade.
1/ What if I told you that the biggest and most urgent problem associated with our sewage system isn't the public health and environmental threat of discharges of human waste into bodies of water? You might not believe me, but it's true...
2/ As serious an environmental problem as sewage discharges are, it's the permanent loss of a very specific mineral carried in our sewage that poses the biggest threat of all.
Let's talk about phosphorous.
3/ Phosphorous is an essential component of the artificial fertilisers that have helped increase agricultural yields enormously since the Second World War. However, the Earth's phosphorous deposits are fixed, unevenly-distributed, and being depleted at an alarming rate.
1/ Just encountered a City Council seeking to spend a large budget on street trees. Good news, were it not for the way in which they want to distribute funding, which risks perpetuating inequality of access to tree canopy and failing to maximise the trees' environmental benefits.
2/ The Council in question is inviting people to apply for street trees, rather than developing its own plan. Since street trees can increase property prices by 15%+, such an approach risks unevenly impacting housing costs and driving gentrification. poverty.ac.uk/report-welfare…
3/ This isn't an argument against delivering street trees - they are an environmental/public health necessity in the urban environment - it's an argument for distributing them evenly and on a rationale basis, so they can't become a force for inequality. audubon.org/news/in-los-an…