Daniel Randall Profile picture
Jul 19 6 tweets 3 min read
One of several risks in aftermath of the #FordeReport is that discussion around antisemitism, and other bigotries, in the party/movement yet again gets lost in weeds of process, procedure, and bureaucracy, rather than being about a political confrontation with reactionary ideas.
The most robust and efficient complaints procedure in the world is not going to uproot bigoted or reactionary ideas. Obviously those procedures should be improved (although “make it easier to expel people” shouldn’t be the aim), but changing ideas requires political education.
On antisemitism, the issue I’ve been most engaged with, successive Labour leaderships have failed on this. Under Corbyn, one decent educational resource (the ‘No Place for Antisemitism’ pamphlet) was produced, but there was no accompanying drive to use it for ongoing education.
Under Starmer, the emphasis has largely been on expelling more people. JLM has run some training, but from the materials I’ve seen, it’s pretty superficial. Where CLPs have tried to run their own education/training, some have been blocked: workersliberty.org/story/2021-01-…
The best work that’s been done, in my view, is by CLPs acting independently who managed to avoid those bureaucratic obstructions and bans: labourlist.org/2020/08/how-ou…. That’s the kind of work that needs to be resourced throughout the party, and not only on antisemitism.
For those interested in seriously critiquing antisemitism on and of the left, from the left, @shane_burley1’s extremely comprehensive reading list for @fullstopmag is probably the best place to start: full-stop.net/2022/04/04/unc…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Randall

Daniel Randall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @therubykid

May 7
There’s a lot about “lockdown spirit” (icky term but indulge it as a shorthand) that was very admirable, emerging from a sense of social solidarity that impelled us to make major personal sacrifices for the sake of the greater collective good. (1/4)
But the same period also gave rise to a lot of petty, embittered, curtain-twitching social spite that saw the whole experience as an opportunity to snitch on and do down other people: the exact opposite of appealing to a sense of social solidarity. (2/4)
In different ways, I think both dynamics are at play in the responses to #Partygate (which is rightly seen as an affront to the former) and #Beergate (which seems to me to have a lot to do with the latter). (3/4)
Read 4 tweets
May 5
Starting a thread of articles, interviews, and exchanges I’ve had around left antisemitism and related issues since the publication of my book ‘Confronting Antisemitism on the Left: Arguments for Socialists’. Links are also available at: dev.nopasaran.media/daniel-randall 🧵
“Confronting antisemitism on the left: anti-authoritarian perspectives”

A discussion with @joeyayoub on his excellent @FireTheseTimes podcast:
“Jews and the left: why antisemitism isn’t over”

In conversation with @Dorianlynskey and @KeithKahnHarris on @bunker_pod: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dai…
Read 12 tweets
Mar 19
Flattered to be mentioned positively in this @Dorianlynskey article. I have thoughts on it, but for now I’ll say that IMO points of overlap btwn left & right stem from abandonment of left-wing principles rather than an inevitable convergence of extremes. unherd.com/2022/03/why-th…
I’m not trying to “No True Scotsman” the real issues @Dorianlynskey is speaking to out of existence: Stalinism is largely an “organic” problem for the left, so to speak, not an incursion from the right, which we (anti-Stalinist leftists) have to confront within the left…
…but I reject the “horseshoe theory” idea that when opposing ideologies become “too extreme” they will inevitably meet, implying that centrist moderation is the ideal political condition. Stalinism is not the inevitable or logical end point of revolutionary socialist ideas.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 15
If you don’t like Paul Mason calling attention to the influence of Stalinist-inspired ideas on the left because you don’t like Mason, fine. But there are many others who’ve been calling attention to the phenomenon for a long time. Here are a few…
Rohini Hensman wrote a whole book about it (read it, it’s very good): haymarketbooks.org/books/1164-ind…. Is Hensman simply “smearing the left”?
A Ukrainian socialist, @ahatanhel, wrote this “Open Letter to the Western Left” *less than a month ago*. Is“smearing the left”, or is he trying to make it better, so it can better help him and his comrades resist brutal Russian imperialism? opendemocracy.net/en/odr/a-lette…
Read 6 tweets
Mar 15
There’s an exchange ongoing On Here™ on whether pro-Putin, or Putin-apologist, views are influential on the left. Some say they’re completely marginal and irrelevant, so much so that even mentioning them feeds into right-wing smears against the left as a whole. Alas, if only. 🧵
Clearly we can’t poll a representative sample of all the individuals who consider themselves “on the left” to get “data” on this. We have to go on a) the positions the organisations of the left have adopted, and b) the views that prominent and influential individuals promote.
So are the “not even worth mentioning” folks saying Stop the War, CPB/Morning Star, Counterfire, Socialist Appeal, or the DSA International Committee (to pick a few) are all completely “marginal and irrelevant”, with *no influence whatsoever* over the dominant ideas of the left?
Read 8 tweets
Mar 6
“No war but class war” expresses an admirable spirit, but it’s politically wrong. Wars of national liberation, or of self-defence against colonial conquest are also legitimate, aren’t they?
On top of which, surely very few of those who use the slogan actually mean it literally. Even most anarchists, in my experience, do actually support anti-colonial/national liberation struggle, even where it has a “cross class” character. So why use a slogan you don’t mean?
The far left is weak/marginal, so one might say… “who cares what the slogans are, it’s irrelevant anyway, so communicating a vague ‘class war’ sentiment is fine.” But if you’re active on the left, presumably you believe it’s possible to get to a point where we’re not marginal…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(