Doug Lewin Profile picture
Jul 20 17 tweets 9 min read
Demand stayed just below 80GW today. Large customer #demandresponse in the form of a rate structure called 4CP (more in this thread) helped to increase reliability and lower costs. Large customers are paid for their reductions. Small customers are not. 1/🧵
#txlege #txenergy
We won't have a reliable and affordable grid without demand flexibility. It’s possible—maybe—to white knuckle it through a summer with aging power plants at an extra cost of billions of dollars each year. But there’s a better and cheaper way...
#energytwitter 2/
To have a grid that is reliable and a market that is affordable, regulators need to figure out how to incorporate demand flexibility into market design.

*Pay people* to automatically (no action required) shift use to times when power is cheap and plentiful to reduce peaks. 3/
If we don’t have outages this summer, 4CP will be a big reason why (as it was in previous yrs). Large commercial & industrial customers in ERCOT have 2 main components of their bills: energy and T&D (tranmission & distribution). Note this applies to Austin Energy and CPS, too. 4/
The T&D part of their bill is set by how much power they consume during the highest 15 minute increment coincident with ERCOT system peak in Jun, Jul, Aug, & Sept. Add the power used during those 4 15-minute increments,➗ by 4 & that determines their T&D rate all year long. 5/
ERCOT quantified the effect: ~2 GW on avg. This lowers prices on the wholesale spot market and given peak would normally be met by 1950’s era combustion turbines, there is a big air quality benefit in addition to the reliability and cost benefit. 6/
ercot.com/files/docs/202…
You can literally see this today. Look at how the demand jumps above yesterday’s monthly peak (79.6GW) then flatlines. Building managers (usually using building control systems) were trying to hold the line to save money on next year’s bills. #Demandresponse at work. #txlege
But that's large C&I customers. What about residential and small commercial? There are barely any offerings at all for us. And yet most of the demand comes from these sectors, especially during extreme weather. We get asked to conserve but don't get paid for it. #txclimate 8/
ERCOT determined that 53% (!) of peak was “weather sensitive” (i.e., HVAC) w/ most of it residential in '18. That would mean today we have >42GW of HVAC. And yet there is only ~300MW of #demandresponse in the resi/small commercial sector (most of that Austin Eneryg and CPS). 9/
There are three main things #demandresponse can do: shift, shave, and shape. Most people think of DR as shaving (e.g. shutting off AC at 4pm). No thanks, even I don’t want anything to do with that. But then there’s shifting and shaping. #energytwitter 10/
Look at the supply and demand curve and price graph for today. Slightly narrow at peak w/ high prices late afternoon but massive amount of cheap spare capacity all the way until 2:00. Why not pre cool your house? Even better, why not get *paid* to pre-cool your house?
#txlege 11/
I don’t want my house above 77 on a hot summer day, but I’d be fine with 72 in the morning so that I’m using less in the afternoon if someone paid me. Would you? (NOTE: whether peak shaving, shifting, or shaping, DR is always voluntary). 13/
I'd need a lot to shut off my AC, but I don't need much to shift use. Even better, smart thermostats will do the work for you. Takes no human effort at all. Set the algorithm: no cooler than 72 in the AM, no warmer than 77 in the afternoon, or whatever levels you want...
14/
The algorithm will monitor pricing and optimize for comfort, cost, and grid reliability (see below). It will also optimize for renewable power and lower emissions, if you're into that sort of thing. (Happily, low cost and low emissions go together). 15/
…er.s3-website.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/#/
But we don’t do this. It’s a massive—& costly—missed opportunity. As the graphic below shows, increasing competition by including demand in markets, reduces spot market prices. Big customers get paid for #demandresponse; small ones don't. #txlege 16/
eepartnership.org/wp-content/upl…
Why don't we have more #demandresponse? (1) generators (broadly speaking) hate it. It lowers prices. That’s great for consumers, not so great for generators. (2) Most people think of it only as shutting off their AC. We need to shift thinking to shift energy use. #energytwitter
#Demandresponse has a big impact. You can see it on a day like today when large customers reduce and get rewarded with lower bills. Let the small business owners, homeowners, & renters get paid, too. We’ll lower bills, lower emissions, AND increase reliability.
End/🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doug Lewin

Doug Lewin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @douglewinenergy

Jul 18
Another week, more record-setting electric demand on the #ERCOT grid:

All-time record (Tuesday): 78.4GW
Projections for today: 79.5
Tomorrow: 80.8
Wednesday: 81.7 (higher than ERCOT's most extreme scenario)

#txlege #txenergy #energytwitter 1/thread
It’s possible we’ll get more conservation alerts. If so, hopefully, @ERCOT_ISO and @PUCTX will get information out faster and be clearer about what resources are available. The public deserves more and better information.
#txlege #txenergy 2/
Last week, on Sunday, PUCT and ERCOT said there were 12GW of "dispatchable” offline. It's not clear what that represents or why it's offline. On Wednesday, that number was up to 13GW. Note they lump all dispatchable into one category while separating out wind and solar. 3/ Image
Read 13 tweets
Jul 11
The PUCT and ERCOT have neglected some of the best solutions for the grid and customers—such as energy efficiency and demand response—and implemented very expensive (and apparently ineffective) ones. Now they're attempting to blame wind for their continued problems.
#txlege 1/🧵
We could be in trouble today bc of: (1) the unreliability of thermal power plants & (2) massive demand, which is a direct result of systematic underinvestment in things like energy efficiency & demand response. Of all the states w/EE goals, we're dead last.
#txenergy 2/
ERCOT's Seasonal Assessment of Resource Adequacy report assumes—and presumably plans for—wind as low as 2,874MW or even 259MW. Today at peak, ERCOT expects 5.7GW of wind generation, 2x the expected low wind levels and 20x the extreme low levels.
#energytwitter 3/
Read 12 tweets
Jul 10
#ERCOT update: New weekend record broken yesterday w/ 77.4GW; expected to be ~77.5GW today. Very low chance of outages today, somewhat higher (though still low) tmrw when 80.5GW expected.

At 9AM, 6.5GW of gas/coal is unavailable, up from 4.9GW yesterday AM.
#txlege #txenergy 1/
Yesterday, 500MW additional thermal (gas/coal) went offline as the day went on and overnight another 1000MW dropped. Hopefully some of those will come back on as the day goes on.

Remember, if there are rolling outages, they are likely to be short duration, nothing like Uri. 2/
If you want to help, pre-cool your home or business in the AM tmrw. In a well functioning market, if you choose to help, you'd be paid to do this. This function would be automatic & you'd keep the thermostat where you want it in the PM, just a little cooler in the AM. 3/
Read 14 tweets
Jun 30
Discussion this morning on local sources of power (aka distributed energy resources or DERs) at the @PUCTX. Cmsr McAdams has engaged w/ stakeholders on a pilot. He proposes a 3 step plan. First step set up an informal workshop on Monday July 11
#txlege #energytwitter 1/
In the 7/11 workshops, McAdams wants to consider key goals and objectives to be achieved in the pilot. Will consider scale, duration, participation, and reliability. Depending on feedback from stakeholders, Cmsrs McAdams and Glotfelty would summarize consensus in a memo (cont) 2/
... which will then be considered in open meeting July 14. Workshop is by invitaiton only. If members of the public or stakeholders want to participate they can reach out to Cmsr. McAdams staff leading the project.
#txenergy 3/
Read 12 tweets
Jun 22
The House State Affairs Committee is underway. @PUCTX Chair Peter Lake has made opening comment & now the questions have begun. Phil King is asking about a major market change called the Load Serving Entity Obligation which would add more costs. (cont.)
#energytwitter #txlege
King wants to know if #txlege will be able to weigh in before the LSEO is implemented. The design of the LSEO is being done by E3 to "independently" analyze the proposal even though they proposed it for a big generator (NRG) last year.
houstonchronicle.com/business/energ…
@PhilKingTX expresses concerns about potential conflicts of interest from E3. He's right to be concerned.

@toddahunter says higher bills are coming and reminds the PUC Chair that the P in PUC stands for Public. Wants transparency for the public. cc: @DaveLieber
#txlege
Read 44 tweets
Jun 20
At ERCOT Board meeting tmrw & at a Texas House Cmte Wed, #ERCOT’s Independent Market Monitor (IMM) will present. The IMM quantified the cost of recent @PUCTX policy changes in her ERCOT presentation & there are some shocking numbers. 1/🧵
#txlege #txenergy
renewableenergyworld.com/solar/the-stat…
Here’s the presentation she’ll make tomorrow. The kicker is in this slide: The “conservative operating posture” of the @PUCTX & @ERCOT_ISO have cost consumers a minimum of $670m over only five months. (The range is $670-$845m)
#txlege #energytwitter 2/
ercot.com/files/docs/202…
The news here is the RUC costs, which market participants & consumer advocates have been sounding the alarm about for months. In my @REWorld article I said it was hard to tell exactly what RUCs cost, but now we know: $460m ytd thru 5/31/22. That’s more than I would've guessed. 3/
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(