2/We’ll talk about the imaging part of TLICS. TLICS scores a fx on (1) morphology & (2) posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury. Let’s start w/morphology. W/only mild axial loading, you get the simplest fx, a compression fx—like a simple long bone fx--worth 1 pt.
3/As the axial force grows, this becomes a burst fx with retropulsion of the posterior vertebral body—just as greater force causes more comminution in long bone fxs. A burst is worth 2 points.
4/If the force is shearing, rather simply compress a vertebral body, you rip the connection between the vertebral bodies—this is the equivalent of pulling on a long bone & causing its dislocation from its joint or connection with another bone. This is worth 3 points
5/Similar to shear forces, distracting forces will rip the vertebral bodies apart. But rather than sliding forward or back, the vertebral bodies are pulled up or down, resulting in a vertical gap between the vertebral bodies. This is worth 4 points
6/This summarizes the TLICS scoring for fracture morphology. The higher the number, the greater the force and injury to the spine—ranging from simple compression fxs worth only 1 point to where the spine is literally ripped apart—a distraction injury, worth 4 points.
7/The next TLICS imaging finding is the integrity of the PLC. If it is intact, you get 0 pts. If you needed a tweetorial for that, well…I can’t help you much. If there is edema, but no true rupture on MRI, that is worth 2 pts. True disruption on MRI is worth 3 pts.
8/Here is an example of suspected injury—edema is seen in the posterior ligamentous complex, but the T2 dark lines that are the ligaments themselves appear intact. This is worth 2 pts.
9/If you can find a true disruption or gap in the T2 dark line of the ligament, that is considered truly disrupted and worth 3 points.
10/Here is the summary of the scoring for PLC injury in TLICS. Edema is suspicious, but only a true gap is considered injured.
So now you know how to score imaging findings in thoracolumbar fxs--I hope that takes a load off your back!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Asking “How old are you?” can be dicey—both in real life & on MRI!
Do you know how to tell the age of blood on MRI?
Here’s a thread on how to date blood on MRI!
After reading this, when you see a hemorrhage, your guess on its age will always be in the right vein!
2/If you ask someone how to date blood on MRI, they’ll spit out a crazy mnemonic about babies that tells you what signal blood should be on T1 & T2 imaging by age.
But mnemonics are crutch—they help you memorize, but not understand
If you understand, you don’t need to memorize
3/If you look at the mnemonic, you will notice one thing—the T1 signal is all you need to tell if blood is acute, subacute or chronic.
T2 signal will tell if it is early or late in each of those time periods—but that type of detail isn’t needed in real life
@TheAJNR 2/Since the prehistoric days of medicine (1979!), we knew that some brain tumor patients treated w/radiation (XRT) initially declined, but then get better.
Today, we see this on imaging, where it looks worse early, but then gets better.
Now we call this pseudoprogression.
@TheAJNR 3/Why does this happen?
XRT induces a lot of inflammatory changes—from initiating the complement cascade to opening the blood brain barrier (BBB)
It’s these inflammatory changes that make the imaging look worse.