4/ Prior studies like the 1 ⬇️ show that trainees spend majority of their days documenting in the electronic health record. Most of the time they don’t receive feedback on this documentation
5/ A framework for teaching with notes is below. You may recognize this framework as similar to the GO Ask-Tell-Ask model for feedback
We will focus on purpose-specific teaching in the next few tweets.
6/ Purpose: Admittedly, many aspects of note-writing differ due to personal preference/style. However, there are 4 universal purposes for notes around which you can structure your teaching.
I will 1st ask my learners, “What is the purpose of us writing this note?”
7/ Depending on interest & level of my learner, I choose to focus on 1 or 2 of these note purposes. Early learners tend to prefer discussing communicating w/ notes & clinical reasoning; I save discussions around billing & legal practicalities for advanced learners
8/ Communication: Do your learners’ notes accurately and concisely communicate what is going on with the pt? Below are a few questions to consider when giving feedback on notes with a focus on communication.
9/ Clinical Reasoning: When reviewing notes for clinical reasoning, I ask myself:
If someone unfamiliar with the pt read this note, could they understand...
❓WHAT is going on with the pt
❓WHY were these specific diagnoses, tests, & interventions chosen?
10/ Clinical Reasoning: Chart-stimulated recall (CSR) is a useful tool to further explore learners’ clinical reasoning based on a case using notes.
The following checklist by the ACGME provides sample ?s that can be used for CSR: acgme.org/globalassets/4…
11/ For learners close to independent practice, I use notes to teach the "business" aspects of charting.
I acknowledge that billing & medical/legal purposes of notes is a byproduct of US healthcare & shouldn’t be the primary driver for what is documented in notes.
12/ SHOWING is better than TELLING. An attestation beyond “I saw & discussed the pt & agree with note” is a great way to role model examples of problem representation, concise clinical course summary, discussing complex differential diagnosis/management decisions
13/ Educators: Have you reviewed patient notes with your learners?
Learners: Have you reviewed notes with your attendings/residents?
2/ We are still covering teaching in the inpatient setting. Interactive teaching can be done in most settings, but I’ll focus on opportunities before/after rounds. We covered interactive teaching during rounds & @ bedside earlier this series
3/ When people say, “This session is going to be interactive,” a talk where learners are asked a series of ?s akin to the socratic method often comes to mind.
For this thread, I'd like to frame “interactive teaching” as below:
This wk, we focus on teaching when delivering difficult news, which can also be done during rounds & routine patient care
3/ But 1st… what counts as “difficult news?” We often think of cancer or terminal illnesses.
But with the definition ⬇️ I think we can agree there are plenty of times when we may be delivering difficult news to patients without even identifying it as such.
1/ Your student is trying to characterize the pt’s aortic stenosis murmur. The pt looks concerned. The rest of your team looks bored, waiting to examine the pt.
How to make PE teaching fruitful & engaging for EVERYONE?