ALABAMA: Up to ~220,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 65% on average.
That's $62/month or $750/year apiece.
ALASKA: Up to ~23,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 62% on average.
That's $97/month or $1169/year apiece.
ARIZONA: Up to ~200,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 38% on average.
That's $69/mo or $830/yr apiece.
ARKANSAS: Up to ~88,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 54% on average.
That's $73/month or $872/year apiece.
CALIFORNIA: Up to 1.5 MILLION enrollees face premium hikes of 82% on average.
That's $92/month or $1,100/year on average.
CA has their own state subsidies which would help mitigate *some* of this but not nearly enough.
COLORADO: Unfortunately i don't have Congressional District data for CO, but statewide up to ~186,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $847/month or over $10,000/year per household.
CONNECTICUT: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for CT, but statewide up to ~105,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,771/month or over $21,000/year per household.
DELAWARE: Up to ~32,000 enrollees are facing average premium hikes of 60%.
That's $101/month or $1,210/year apiece.
FLORIDA: Up to ~2.72 MILLION enrollees would face average premium hikes of 61%.
That's $49/month or $588/year apiece.
GEORGIA: Up to ~700,000 enrollees would face average premium hikes of 47%.
That's $50/month or $597/year apiece.
HAWAII: Up to ~22,000 enrollees would face average premium hikes of 43%.
That's $71/month or $853/year apiece.
IDAHO: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for ID, but statewide up to ~68,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,384/month or over $16,600/year per household.
ILLINOIS: Up to ~323,000 enrollees would face premium hikes of 38%.
That's $78/month or $930/year apiece.
INDIANA: Up to ~156,000 enrollees would face premium hikes of 38% on average.
That's $73/month or $875/year apiece.
IOWA: Up to ~72,000 enrollees would face premium hikes of 72% on average.
That's $97/month or $1,165/year apiece.
KANSAS: Up to ~107,000 enrollees would face premium hikes of 44% on average.
That's $65/month or $786/year apiece.
KENTUCKY: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for KY, but statewide up to ~69,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,178/month or over $14,000/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
LOUISIANA: Up to ~99,000 enrollees are facing premium hikes of 54% on average.
That's $85/month or $1,019/year apiece.
MAINE: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for ME, but statewide up to ~62,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,320/month or over $15,800/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
MARYLAND: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for MD, but statewide up to ~170,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $929/month or over $11,100/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
MASSACHUSETTS: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for MA, but statewide up to ~251,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $696/month or over $8,300/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
MICHIGAN: Up to 303,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 39% on average.
That's $66/month or $795/year on average.
MINNESOTA: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for MN, but statewide up to ~114,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $684/month or over $8,200/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
MISSISSIPPI: Up to 143,000 enrollees would face rate hikes of 67% on average.
That's $48/month or $576/year apiece.
MISSOURI: Up to 250,000 enrollees would face rate hikes of 50% on average.
That's $68/month or $819/year apiece.
MONTANA: UP to 51,000 enrollees would face rate hikes of 58% on average.
That's $83/month or $994/year on average.
NEBRASKA: Up to 99,000 enrollees would face rate hikes of 81% on average.
That's $98/month or $1,176/year apiece.
NEVADA: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for NV, but statewide up to ~95,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $956/month or over $11,400/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Up to ~52,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 28% on average.
That's $60/month or $722/year apiece.
NEW JERSEY: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for NJ, but statewide up to ~304,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $846/month or over $10,000/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
NEW MEXICO: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for NM, but statewide up to ~42,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $918/month or over $11,000/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
NEW YORK: 199,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 58% on average.
That's $121/month or $1,453/year on average.
NORTH CAROLINA: Unfortunately, I don't have the Congressional District breakout, but statewide, ~670,000 enrollees are looking at 66% rate hikes on average.
That's $63/month or $762/year apiece.
NORTH DAKOTA: Up to 29,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 80% on average.
That's $80/month or $957/year apiece.
OHIO: Up to 260,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 29%.
That's $68/month or $813/year apiece.
OKLAHOMA: Up to 189,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 65% on average.
That's $60/month or $722/year apiece.
OREGON: Up to 146,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 41% on average.
That's $82/month or $986/year apiece.
PENNSYLVANIA: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for PA, but statewide up to ~352,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $869/month or over $10,400/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
RHODE ISLAND: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for RI, but statewide up to ~30,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,000/month or nearly $12,000/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
SOUTH CAROLINA: ~300,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 56% on average.
That's $60/mo or $721/year apiece.
SOUTH DAKOTA: ~41,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 96% on average.
That's $87/month or $1,044/year apiece.
TENNESSEE: ~273,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 47% on average.
That's $60/month or $720/year apiece.
TEXAS: Up to 1.84 MILLION enrollees are facing premium rate hikes of 55% on average.
That's $47/month or $564/year apiece.
UTAH: Up to 256,000 enrollees are facing premium rate hikes of 86% on average.
That's $53/mont or $636/year apiece.
VERMONT: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for VT, but statewide up to ~25,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $791/month or over $9,400/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
VIRGINIA: Up to 308,000 enrollees are facing premium hikes of 56% on average.
That's $71/month or $852/year apiece.
WASHINGTON STATE: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for WA, but statewide up to ~225,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,113/month or over $13,300/year per household. acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
WEST VIRGINIA: 23,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 63% on average.
That's $127/month or $1,527/year apiece.
WISCONSIN: 212,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 56% on average.
That's $90/month or $1,078/year apiece.
WYOMING: 34,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 132% on average. That's not a typo.
That's $116/month or $1,390/year apiece.
📣 It's important to note that all of the above numbers and averages are based on *2022* premiums.
If you earn over 4x the poverty level, your *2023* premiums will likely be ~8.5% higher ON TOP OF that if the #AmRescuePlan subsidies aren't extended: acasignups.net/22/07/19/updat…
NOTE: If the subsidy extension doesn't make it this year, it's still possible that it can be done retroactively next year...but only if Democrats keep control of the House & keep (& hopefully BUILD on) our majority in the Senate.
The Inflation Reduction Act is also the reason over 20 million #ACA enrollees are saving an average of $800/yr on health insurance premiums.
Unfortunately that provision is scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025 unless legislation is passed to make the savings permanent.
I’ve written up estimates of how much net premiums would jump for various households in every state starting in January 2016 if the IRA subsidy formula isn’t extended. It’s not pretty. Here’s the first 5 states: acasignups.net/24/07/09/state…
Folks, donating to #HarrisWalz2024 is fine, but we REALLY need to focus on DOWNBALLOT races as well!
Here's how much I've raised for Harris/Walz vs. ~70 House/Senate races & ~700 State Legislative races.
Pick a page, pick some candidates & donate at . Blue24.org
Here's my Senate page where you can donate DIRECTLY to @RubenGallego, @DebbieforFL, @AlsobrooksForMD, @ElissaSlotkin, @jontester, @RosenforNevada, @SherrodBrown, @Bob_Casey, @ColinAllredTX & @tammybaldwin, as well as up to 10 other Senate Dem nominees:
@RubenGallego @DebbieforFL @AlsobrooksForMD @ElissaSlotkin @jontester @RosenforNevada @SherrodBrown @Bob_Casey @ColinAllredTX @tammybaldwin Here's my House page where you can donate DIRECTLY to up to 50 Dems running for COMPETITIVE House races, including @DrAmishShah, @EngelForArizona, @AdamGrayCA, @RudySalasCA, @gtwhitesides, @WillRollinsCA, @YadiraCaraveo, @CurtisHertelJr & @McdonaldRivet:
🔥 Guys...donating to #HarrisWalz2024 is fine, but we REALLY need to focus DOWN BALLOT as well! 1/
As my followers know, I've set up a simple website at which contains pages to donate DIRECTLY to *hundreds* of Democrats running for *competitive* seats in everything from State Legislature to U.S. Senate. 2/Blue24.org
So far this cycle I've raised a staggering $5.4 MILLION for #HarrisWalz2024. I'm incredibly proud of this...but I'm STRONGLY urging people to also donate to STATE LEGISLATIVE races, where small donations go a lot farther.
My main concern wasn’t about her personally (I actually supported her over Biden back in 2019); it was more about whether they could make the transition without it turning into a mess. So far they’ve pulled it off nearly perfectly.
With early voting starting in just 65 days in a few states, David asked this very reasonable question. I'm not an expert, but my general understanding of the situation is this: 1/
There've been a number of polls claiming that Harris/etc. would perform a few points better...but that's all THEORETICAL.
We all know that the moment it became a reality the numbers could change dramatically...especially given all the other chaos which would surround it. 2/
The thinking seems to be that Harris has a higher ceiling but also a lower floor. If you're 100% certain that Biden can't win, it therefore makes sense to figure you have nothing to lose.
However, this would upset millions of Dems who voted for Biden in the primary... 3/
Thread. ~20 years ago, one of the minor controversies surrounding then-President George W. Bush was after being warned that something he wanted to do was unconstitutional, he allegedly angrily replied that the Constitution is "just a damned piece of paper!" 1/
I don't know whether this actually happened or not, but regardless of how appalling it my is, on the most basic level that's actually *correct*: The Constitution *in and of itself* *is* "just a damned peice of paper." It's not a talisman. It doesn't have any magical powers. 2/
The power of The Constitution is in the hands of whoever the American People happen to be at any particular point in time.
If those in charge *and* enough of those who aren't either actively want to ignore the Constitution or just don't care enough to defend it, guess what? 3/