Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Twitter logo
Jul 26 • 55 tweets • 20 min read
📣🚨 How much more will #ACA enrollees pay in 2023 if #AmRescuePlan subsidies *aren't* extended?

Here's a breakout by CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT across 33 states + DC:
acasignups.net/22/07/14/congr…
ALABAMA: Up to ~220,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 65% on average.

That's $62/month or $750/year apiece.
ALASKA: Up to ~23,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 62% on average.

That's $97/month or $1169/year apiece.
ARIZONA: Up to ~200,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 38% on average.

That's $69/mo or $830/yr apiece.
ARKANSAS: Up to ~88,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 54% on average.

That's $73/month or $872/year apiece.
CALIFORNIA: Up to 1.5 MILLION enrollees face premium hikes of 82% on average.

That's $92/month or $1,100/year on average.

CA has their own state subsidies which would help mitigate *some* of this but not nearly enough.
COLORADO: Unfortunately i don't have Congressional District data for CO, but statewide up to ~186,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $847/month or over $10,000/year per household.

acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
CONNECTICUT: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for CT, but statewide up to ~105,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,771/month or over $21,000/year per household.

acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
DELAWARE: Up to ~32,000 enrollees are facing average premium hikes of 60%.

That's $101/month or $1,210/year apiece.
FLORIDA: Up to ~2.72 MILLION enrollees would face average premium hikes of 61%.

That's $49/month or $588/year apiece.
GEORGIA: Up to ~700,000 enrollees would face average premium hikes of 47%.

That's $50/month or $597/year apiece.
HAWAII: Up to ~22,000 enrollees would face average premium hikes of 43%.

That's $71/month or $853/year apiece.
IDAHO: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for ID, but statewide up to ~68,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,384/month or over $16,600/year per household.

acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
ILLINOIS: Up to ~323,000 enrollees would face premium hikes of 38%.

That's $78/month or $930/year apiece.
INDIANA: Up to ~156,000 enrollees would face premium hikes of 38% on average.

That's $73/month or $875/year apiece.
IOWA: Up to ~72,000 enrollees would face premium hikes of 72% on average.

That's $97/month or $1,165/year apiece.
KANSAS: Up to ~107,000 enrollees would face premium hikes of 44% on average.

That's $65/month or $786/year apiece.
KENTUCKY: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for KY, but statewide up to ~69,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,178/month or over $14,000/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
LOUISIANA: Up to ~99,000 enrollees are facing premium hikes of 54% on average.

That's $85/month or $1,019/year apiece.
MAINE: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for ME, but statewide up to ~62,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,320/month or over $15,800/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
MARYLAND: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for MD, but statewide up to ~170,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $929/month or over $11,100/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
MASSACHUSETTS: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for MA, but statewide up to ~251,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $696/month or over $8,300/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
MICHIGAN: Up to 303,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 39% on average.

That's $66/month or $795/year on average.
MINNESOTA: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for MN, but statewide up to ~114,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $684/month or over $8,200/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
MISSISSIPPI: Up to 143,000 enrollees would face rate hikes of 67% on average.

That's $48/month or $576/year apiece.
MISSOURI: Up to 250,000 enrollees would face rate hikes of 50% on average.

That's $68/month or $819/year apiece.
MONTANA: UP to 51,000 enrollees would face rate hikes of 58% on average.

That's $83/month or $994/year on average.
NEBRASKA: Up to 99,000 enrollees would face rate hikes of 81% on average.

That's $98/month or $1,176/year apiece.
NEVADA: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for NV, but statewide up to ~95,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $956/month or over $11,400/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Up to ~52,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 28% on average.

That's $60/month or $722/year apiece.
NEW JERSEY: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for NJ, but statewide up to ~304,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $846/month or over $10,000/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
NEW MEXICO: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for NM, but statewide up to ~42,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $918/month or over $11,000/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
NEW YORK: 199,000 enrollees face premium hikes of 58% on average.

That's $121/month or $1,453/year on average.
NORTH CAROLINA: Unfortunately, I don't have the Congressional District breakout, but statewide, ~670,000 enrollees are looking at 66% rate hikes on average.

That's $63/month or $762/year apiece.
NORTH DAKOTA: Up to 29,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 80% on average.

That's $80/month or $957/year apiece.
OHIO: Up to 260,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 29%.

That's $68/month or $813/year apiece.
OKLAHOMA: Up to 189,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 65% on average.

That's $60/month or $722/year apiece.
OREGON: Up to 146,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 41% on average.

That's $82/month or $986/year apiece.
PENNSYLVANIA: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for PA, but statewide up to ~352,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $869/month or over $10,400/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
RHODE ISLAND: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for RI, but statewide up to ~30,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,000/month or nearly $12,000/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
SOUTH CAROLINA: ~300,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 56% on average.

That's $60/mo or $721/year apiece.
SOUTH DAKOTA: ~41,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 96% on average.

That's $87/month or $1,044/year apiece.
TENNESSEE: ~273,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 47% on average.

That's $60/month or $720/year apiece.
TEXAS: Up to 1.84 MILLION enrollees are facing premium rate hikes of 55% on average.

That's $47/month or $564/year apiece.
UTAH: Up to 256,000 enrollees are facing premium rate hikes of 86% on average.

That's $53/mont or $636/year apiece.
VERMONT: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for VT, but statewide up to ~25,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $791/month or over $9,400/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
VIRGINIA: Up to 308,000 enrollees are facing premium hikes of 56% on average.

That's $71/month or $852/year apiece.
WASHINGTON STATE: Unfortunately I don't have Congressional District data for WA, but statewide up to ~225,000 enrollees face premium hikes of as much as $1,113/month or over $13,300/year per household.
acasignups.net/22/06/29/state…
WEST VIRGINIA: 23,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 63% on average.

That's $127/month or $1,527/year apiece.
WISCONSIN: 212,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 56% on average.

That's $90/month or $1,078/year apiece.
WYOMING: 34,000 enrollees are facing rate hikes of 132% on average. That's not a typo.

That's $116/month or $1,390/year apiece.
📣 It's important to note that all of the above numbers and averages are based on *2022* premiums.

If you earn over 4x the poverty level, your *2023* premiums will likely be ~8.5% higher ON TOP OF that if the #AmRescuePlan subsidies aren't extended: acasignups.net/22/07/19/updat…
NOTE: If the subsidy extension doesn't make it this year, it's still possible that it can be done retroactively next year...but only if Democrats keep control of the House & keep (& hopefully BUILD on) our majority in the Senate.

You can help here...
secure.actblue.com/donate/senateb…
...and here... secure.actblue.com/donate/housebl…
...and here: secure.actblue.com/donate/housebl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Charles Gaba 🇺🇦

Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @charles_gaba

Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Jul 27
This tweet is a perfect example of why, while I appreciate his work on the J6 committee and willingness to call out his party’s descent into fascism, Rep. Kinzinger still just doesn’t get it.

She was addressing blind disability activists. It’s called compassion and decency.
I wonder if @AdamKinzinger has a similar problem w/subtitles in movies or with ASL interpreters being onstage during speeches?

I also wonder if he knows that the #ADA was signed into law by GOP President George H.W. Bush after being championed by GOP Senator Bob Dole?
Also worth noting that @AdamKinzinger voted for Donald Trump AFTER this happened:

nbcnews.com/politics/2016-…
Read 5 tweets
Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Jul 26
ALABAMA: (Preliminary) avg. unsubsidized 2023 #ACA rate changes: +8.4% (unweighted):
acasignups.net/22/07/26/alaba…
As an aside, in case you're wondering why I've only been able to acquire the weighted average rate hikes for 20 states so far, here's an example of part of the problem:
It doesn't do much good to require actuarial memos to be posted publicly if 90% of the actual content of those memos IS REDACTED.
Read 4 tweets
Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Jul 25
📣 Here's an updated version of my Dem Senate challenger filibuster reform candidate status list.

--Of the 15 races where the Dem nominee is known, at least 12 support eliminating the filibuster entirely; at least 1 more supports reforming it.
--Of the 31 candidates running to flip Senate seats where the Dem nominee is unknown:

--at least 12 support eliminating the filibuster
--at least 3 others support reforms of some sort

I still don't know the stances of the other 18 candidates (including 2 known nominees).
The list will be cleaned up quite a bit next week after Kansas & Missouri have their primaries, and then in 2 weeks when Wisconsin has theirs.
Read 5 tweets
Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Jul 25
Many people (including the Big Bang Theory) have noted that if Indy hadn't gone after the Ark, the Nazis still would've found it, still would've opened it and still would've gotten their faces melted off.

However, it occurs to me that this goes one step further...
...if he hadn't gotten involved, instead of transporting the Ark via submarine, they likely would've simply flown it directly to Berlin (which was the original plan)...meaning Belloq wouldn't have had time to convince the powers that be to re-route it to a remote island.
In other words, without Indy getting involved, the Ark likely would've ended up melting off the faces of Hitler and his entire High Command all in one shot, potentially ending WWII right then and there.

#DamnYouIndy!
Read 4 tweets
Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Jul 23
😳😳😳 My wife spied this hornets nest under our roof overhang today. About a foot in diameter. Image
It wasn’t there less than a month ago. These suckers work FAST.
For what it's worth, the best way to defeat wasps is to help flip the Michigan legislature blue this fall: secure.actblue.com/donate/bluemi2…
Read 4 tweets
Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Jul 17
I mostly agree w/this thread. I *list* extreme long shot seats for *statewide* races since most people know that a Dem winning in, say, SD is almost impossible, but I still emphasize the more winnable seats. For district-level races, however, I try to stick to competitive seats.
…or at least *potentially* competitive seats. I also include the PVI rating for every district-level race to give people some idea of how tough each district is. Generally I stick to D/R +10 or less, with a few exceptions.
Now there are *other* arguments for helping long shots—building turnout for *their* race can help boost Dem turnout for a winnable *statewide* race, for instance. Just don’t donate to a Dem in an R+30 district thinking that THEY’RE gonna win, outside of an extreme scenario.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(