3. Then, on Monday, Grassley revealed that several #whistlelowers had come forward to detail how systemic political bias infects the @FBI and @TheJusticeDept through gatekeepers like Thibault and others who decide what gets investigated and what doesn't.
4. Gone unnoticed thus far is that the #whistleblowers reported Thibault and another official were "deeply involved" in initiating the "false-electors scheme" probe that @washingtonpost reported in the article linked above.
5. The #whistleblowers also reported a long history of "double standards" by Thibault and others in election-related cases, suggesting @TheJusticeDept and @FBI "have failed to prevent political bias from infecting the process and procedure to open and pursue investigations."
6. So insiders are now raising "fundamental questions" about DOJ's "impartiality" to Senate oversight authorities.
Yet @washingtonpost left its readers in the dark on the WB's claims about Thibault's role in this politically charged probe.
We all know what happens in darkness.
7. Sen. Grassley revealed that FBI Director Wray assured him that Thibault had since been removed from any "decision-making role." (around 4min mark)
More shades of Strzok. Remove the one who lets the bias show, but full steam ahead on the probe.
Who is the other official #whistleblowers identified, along with Thibault, as being "deeply involved" in launching DOJ's "false-electors scheme" criminal probe?
Richard Pilger, Director of the Election Crimes Branch, who has a history with Lois Lerner & IRS targeting.
Pilger contacted Lerner in 2013 asking to coordinate with the IRS on an idea from @SenWhitehouse for DOJ to "piece together false statement" cases against certain nonprofits.
3. You remember Lois Lerner.
She's the IRS official held in contempt of Congress.
And yet, @TheJusticeDept refused to even present the contempt citation to a Grand Jury, as required by statute.
From our lawsuit seeking documents about what, if anything, @TheJusticeDept has done to address the appearances of a conflict created by the hiring of a prominent Durham critic from Brookings to a senior National Security Division position:
"This remarkable email establishes that the Andersen team’s initial reaction was to suspect that SARS-CoV-2 had been engineered in a lab. Their subsequent letter doesn’t adequately explain how they overcame this impression."
"After taking one look at the horrific possibility that a lab leak origin for SARS-CoV-2 might cause virology labs all over the world to be closed down, it would seem, the Andersen team decided to disregard their first impressions of possible manipulation."
"The Jan. 31, 2020, email from Mr. Andersen shows that Dr. Fauci knew from the beginning that experts had serious suspicions about the virus’s origins."
Congress rarely gets a sympathetic ear from the judicial branch when asking to use the court’s authority rather than its own Constitutional tools to get information.
That’s especially true if the subpoenas in question were issued on a partisan basis and the partisans involved admit to CNN that their oversight is actually a political fishing expedition for presidential election purposes.
Watchdogs to Biden: Discipline "Up to and Including Removal" is Warranted for Fellow IG—Finally bit.ly/substack-jsnfo…
I personally interviewed several of the whistleblowers who reported IG Wertheimer’s misconduct to Congress beginning in 2015, when I worked for Senator Grassley. Their stories were compelling and disturbing.
Her assistant inspector general “threatened to retaliate against OIG employees who complained to Senator Grassley’s office by stating that she would make criminal complaints about those individuals to the Department of Justice,”