#BLS#NFP estimates for July hover around 270K, but recent estimates have proven dramatically unreliable to the downside.
At some point, the opposite will be the case.
With unemployment claims rising, let's see if this is the month?
NFP shock at +528,000 jobs created or restored.
Average hourly earnings up 0.5%.
This was NOT the month for a retrenchment, to say the least.
More to come....
Upward adjustments from prior months pretty much across the board. The labor force DECLINED (continuing prior pattern) by 63K and the unemployment rate falls to 3.5%.
The Fed's trajectory is clear at this point.
Let's look at where these jobs gains came from:
Private sector growth was 471K of the 528K. The 57K in government hiring was 30K education.
Of the private sector, goods production came in at a very healthy 69K, with construction at 32K and manufacturing at 30K....
A really good sign for manufacturing is that of the 30K, 21K was durables and only 1.8K is in low paying food manufacturing. A very strong sign. In services, however, the outcome was somewhat different. The lower paying sectors responsible for the lion's share of July's growth...
Retail, Administrative and Waste, Healthcare and Social Services, Leisure and Hospitality and Other, together added 258,000 of the 471,000 private sector jobs (54%) and 64% of all service sector jobs.
But the pickup in lower paying jobs is likely emblematic of wage growth in those sectors attracting workers back into same, more than it is a sign of worker desperation, in this job-rich environment.
The @jobqualityindex's JQInstant read of the percentage of private sector jobs formed or restored in July in sectors that pay below the average of all private sector jobs, shows 51.4%. A little lighter than the 54% I roughed out above, and a good sign:
So to wrap up, some additional thoughts: 1) This hiring spurt in services may well be linked to "back to work" in many cities (even NYC). Retail, restaurant, hotel and administrative jobs coming back (finally, and relatively suddenly) in enough volume to truly move the needle.>>
2) Notwithstanding the above extraordinary situation, this and prior jobs reports beg a question:
Why aren't Democrats, heading in to the mid-terms, pivoting from talking about the downer of inflation to running commercials showing millions of happy Americans working and playing?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A Critique of the July Employment Situation Report (long thread, but important):
As you are likely aware, the Household Survey and Establishment Survey components of the report have been diverging in recent months to relatively historic extremes.
2/ People are not reporting themselves as employed to the degree that employers are reporting that they have restored or created jobs.
Here's what I believe may be happening. First, some basics:
The establishment survey counts a job as a job no matter how few hours were worked.
3/ Part-time is as good as full-time.
Also, summer data is extraordinarily vulnerable to seasonal adjustment errors given summer seasonal employment, in connection with both surveys.
It is #CPIDay and all (CP)eyes in the markets and at the Fed are on US inflation data due in 5 minutes. The focus will be on M/M core goods and core services.
May M/M Headline #CPI up whopping 1.0%
M/M Core up 0.6%
Lets dive in to see what caused this broad based spike upwards:
And the answer is that Core Goods jumped up 0.7% M/M, relative to a decline of 0.4% in March and and increase of 0.2% in April. Core Services moved up 0.6%, a bit higher than prior months, on an expected jump in rents and owners equivalent rents (both up 0.6% M/M).>>
Core inflation came in a good deal softer than the 0.5% M/M expected (by others), at 0.3% M/M. While food and energy are on fire, goods prices - less food and energy - are in retreat FALLING -0.4% M/M. Services are the story today. But shelter price growth actually retreated.
Shelter price growth - rent of homes and owners equivalent rent of homes in particular - is lagging data but was expected to start kicking up higher this month. Instead, rent growth subsides to 0.4% M/M from 0.6% the month prior and OER stays at 0.4%.
The core goods deflation M/M was concentrated just where you would expect it. In those things that went bonkers during 2020: transportation, electronics, recreation and leisure. Supply chains are reopened for the most part and demand is becoming sated.
The end of the "wage price spiral" meme (sorry @LHSummers) has added to the rally in US treasury bonds already spurred by safe-haven seeking related to the horrors abroad. 10-year now yielding less than 1.75%.
American low wage/low-hours jobs are being taken up out of necessity.
That the lower income workers would need to return was obvious. Pressures on professional services wages resulting from trying to lure into the office workers who had seen their spending power go up by not commuting/living elsewhere and eroded by short-term inflation, was noise.
Unfortunately, most economists associate with professional services workers, so that noise was amplified quite loudly.
This was always going to be about inflation from supply-chain disruption, and labor shortages from government support of households. Both - um - "transient."
#BLS#NFP Distracted Jobs Day to you.
Hard to pay attention with what is going on abroad.
Fed's move is known, and constrained by market reaction to the above.
A glance will be had at wage and income growth.
Headline number will likely underperform consensus.
But no one will care
Here we go:
Non farm payrolls up by 678,000
Private sector 654,000
Unemployment 3.8%
Boy was I wrong. More to come.
Hourly wages were flat though!
OK, there was a BIG catch-up in all the low-wage/low-hours jobs we had been missing for months. Over 360,000 jobs restored in retail, leisure and hospitality, education and healthcare and administrative and waste alone. This is why aggregate hourly wage growth was only a penny.>>
UKRAINE: WHERE IS RUSSIA'S ACHILLES HEEL?
A Thread
1/15
In most every global conflict - offensive or defensive, military or economic - western governments seek to game out the likely reactions of adversaries.
We assume the Russians engage, at some level, in a similar exercise.
>
2/15
The "game over" for most responsible governments is, of course, global nuclear war. So all actions - military or economic - risking escalation to that point are viewed as potential steps towards the unthinkable.
>>
3/15
And there is always the risk of the irrational actor who ignores the principles of Mutually Assured Destruction and sets off a cataclysm.
There has been much discussion, of late, on whether Putin is such an actor.
>>