Today I have a dinner with my friends who are working for different UN agencies, related to #HumanRights. We had a discussion on the latest @amnesty report on Ukraine. You know, they also published some unpleasant data on Ukraine but…
2/ The UN data is more precise, of course, they anonymize their respondents, but they are clear abt places and institutions. They try not to use these clickbait headlines as the @amnesty did regarding #Ukraine 
It rises a lot of questions, why the home-office @amnesty wasn’t involved to provide some context. Sometimes it takes months to establish a vocabulary, one from the International orgs could use to understand the victims of the #war or #HumanRightsViolations in the concrete area
The most concerning point,that @amnesty were so fast with their report on #Ukraine, that they apparently skipped the advocacy part of their mission. They didn’t apply to the MoD, @GeneralStaffUA, with their concerns regarding the #civilians and the #HumanRights, they published it
The @amnesty choose a clickbait headline, they didn’t provide a lot of sources and, apparently, didn’t use the advocacy instruments to protect #civilians in 🇺🇦and eliminate violations first. The advocacy moment skipping is very important here, cause #UN home-offices use it first.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
