Delhi High Court will continue to hear today bail plea of former JNU student Umar Khalid.
He was arrested by the Delhi Police in September 2020 in connection with the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case and has remained in jail since. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots
The plea will be heard by a bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Rajnish Bhatnagar.
Bail pleas of other accused including Sharjeel Imam, Khalid Saifi, Meera Haider and others are also listed before the same bench. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots
Prasad refers to Sharjeel Imam's speech where he allegedly talked about cutting-off Assam and North-east from rest of India. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots
Prasad: Please keep in my he is saying Army lagani padegi (army will have to be deployed). It means they had this in mind. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots
Prasad: We have seen the nature and content of two speeches. I want read one speech of Umar Khalid once again.
J Bhatnagar: You want to read it your way.
Prasad: Yes.. As I have said all of these speeches have four to five themes. These are triple talaq, Kashmir, CAA and muslims. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots
Chief Justice of India NV Ramana felicitated by #SupremeCourt Employees’ Welfare Association. CJI Ramana recounting the #Covid lockdown period says "At one point, on a single day 500 employees of Supreme Court were COVID positive. It was a frightening situation."
CJI NV Ramana on the Registry of #SupremeCourt : "Risking your lives, you all have worked through the deadly pandemic. You have ensured that the Supreme Court continued to function without even a single day’s break. It shows your commitment to the institution."
Speaking about some administrative reforms, CJI NV Ramana says the Secretary General has been directed to have the staff alternate Saturdays as holidays in lieu of working full day on other Saturdays. #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court to hear the #MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis matter today at 12.30 pm. This is with regard to the dispute between the Uddhav Thackeray and Ekanth Shinde led factions of Shiv Sena
SC: it is important to highlight on power of deputy speaker to initiate disqualification proceeding when such proceeding has been initiated against him. Here Nabam Rabia judgment needs gap filling.
SC: Thus a constitutional bench to look at the gap filling and a bench of 5 judges to look into this along with the issue of notice of removal of speaker.
#SupremeCourt hears the case seeking to prevent political parties from promising freebies to the electorate to gain political dividend at the cost of ignoring state budgets #Freebies
CJI NV Ramana: We saw your written submissions Mr Kapil Sibal. You have gone back to original stand
Sibal: Yes Mahatma Gandhi once said wise men often corrects their stand. not that I am calling myself wise
CJI: This is an important issue definitely.
CJI: See tomorrow a particular states gives a scheme, and we are all beneficiaries of scheme, can it be said it it is prerogative of govt so you cannot look into this. A debate is needed.
#SupremeCourt hears a plea by Indian Medical Association which alleges that a smear campaign against the vaccination drive and modern medicines are being conducted in the country
IMA: the kind of disparaging statements made and the public is being misguided. We made representations and no answer. govt also knows about such misleading ads by Ayush companies etc #allopathy
IMA: They say that doctors were taking allopathy but still succumbing during the COVID wave. If this happens unbated then it will cause serious prejudice to us.
Can Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016, be applied retrospectively? #SupremeCourt to rule today
CJI NV Ramana led bench to deliver judgment in a plea preferred by Centre against a Calcutta HC order holding that that 2016 amendment Act was prospective in nature
SC: It is a very lengthy judgment. Lot of efforts were put in this.
SC: Indian jurisprudence has matured and it is manifest that courts have read down any such provision which hampers the criminal justice system. We can only recommend that utility of independent forfeiture provision needs to be used cautiously