We now have the highest rate of economic inactivity due to long-term health issues for over 20yrs - almost 2.4m people
This is increasingly due to #MentalHealth, something I spent 18 frustrating months advising the DWP on a few years ago
Here's where things are going wrong...🧵
First of all, there are a whole range of factors causing more people to struggle with their mental health:
-poverty & inequality
-poor living conditions
-loneliness & isolation
-the impact of the pandemic
-stressful & insecure work
-difficulty accessing mental health support
2/11
These issues need to be tackled through concerted action across national & local government, services & communities
However, the DWP has a key role to play in providing financial support to people who are struggling & (for now) trying to help people back into employment 3/11
The problem is, the DWP has a very poor record of supporting people who face more complex barriers to employment
By the end of my time there I'd concluded that this was due to deep institutional & cultural issues, which I set out in this @Demos paper 4/11 demos.co.uk/project/pathwa…
The biggest of these issues is that the DWP sees the people it supports primarily as 'benefit claimants'
As a result, it is overly focused on reducing expenditure & it sees the threat of withdrawing benefits as the key tool for motivating people to take steps towards work 5/11
For people with more complex barriers to work, & particularly mental health problems, these kind of threats are ineffective & damaging
People need security & a strong trusting relationship of support, both of which are undermined by a benefits system focused on compliance 6/11
Over 2 million people can't be threatened with sanctions due to the severity of their health conditions or disabilities
The DWP is at a loss as to how to support more of this group into work without the conditional relationship it holds with other people on benefits 7/11
The DWP is the biggest government department, directly delivering much of the employment support it designs
As a result, staff struggle to imagine an approach that isn't constrained by the parameters of how they currently operate, despite the poor outcomes for this group 8/11
Even if the DWP was able to make changes on the scale needed (which I don't believe it is), they would still face a huge trust issue
People who have had a poor experience with the department will struggle to engage with support in a way that will lead to positive outcomes 9/11
My conclusion was that support for people facing more complex barriers should be designed & delivered locally, through local authorities, the NHS & the third sector
Many people with complex barriers such as mental health problems could be helped into employment with the right support - benefiting them, our society & the economy
But it needs a fundamentally different approach, built around compassion, understanding, trust & security 11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everyone I spoke to described experiencing some feelings of shame & embarrassment about using a food bank, particularly on their first visit. Many had put off seeking support that they desperately needed because of the stigma associated with poverty & accessing food aid. 2/10
People’s circumstances were complex & personal but the underlying reason for needing food aid was simple & universal: their income (primarily from benefits but sometimes from wages too) was inadequate to make ends meet, particularly after the £20-a-week #UniversalCredit cut. 3/10
Behind each of these overturned decisions is a person enduring months of uncertainty, anxiety & insufficient income. People often feel invalidated & even question their own disability. Their #MentalHealth suffers, sometimes to the point of feeling suicidal independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
Other services, particularly NHS #MentalHealth services, often have to step in to both support someone through the process of challenging a decision & to respond to the psychological fallout of the stress this situation causes. This puts a further strain on public finances
A process to ration resources between people is always likely to leave some feeling unfairly treated, but there is so much space for improvement within the current system. Social security should be seen as an investment in people rather than just a cost to be minimised
Reflecting on #DWP's mindless return to conditionality & sanctions (despite it being a totally inappropriate response at this time & an ineffective & often counter-productive approach for many people) got me thinking about policy driven by a misplaced sense of morality 1/10
The assumption behind conditionality & sanctions is that people need the threat of losing their benefits to motivate them to find work. This is implicitly justified on the basis that people are getting something from the state & so have a moral duty to do something in return 2/10
Similar morality narratives shape (& are used to justify) policy around drugs and alcohol, homelessness, immigration &, most obviously, the criminal justice system. But the associated approaches of reward & punishment tend to be pretty ineffective in terms of outcomes 3/10