- Biden Corruption (Dems ran on Trump "Corruption" from Day One and won the House in 2018).
TBH. I don't have more stuff because the DC GOP is anyway useless. 🤡
Regarding the "brilliant" point by @EWErickson that the GOP should campaign against Student Loan Fogginess (the way Cocaine Mitch opposed $2K checks pre-GASen runoffs and then lost the 2 seats which EW blames on Trump who favored the checks): @Cernovich has a good take 👇🏼
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hello folks. We always knew that the economy growing/falling is based on Gross Domestic Product data which the BEA confirmed today did in fact fall in Q2 after falling in Q1.
Jason saying the "economy grew" is his unilateral redefining of the economy by adding another data set.
2/ When the initial GDP data for the Second Quarter was released a month ago, Dems and their media drove the message that two negative quarters of GDP does not mean a recession. It is also dependent on the job market; a line hardly-if-ever before used when defining recession.
3/ Now that the Second Quarter data was revised and it is still showing a negative, we get sold a new claim:
Recession is when Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Gross Domestic Income (GDI) are both negative by calculating them together. @jasonfurman said it and also Bloomberg 👇🏼
- Voted with Biden on multiple key issues which means they can't attack it.
- Shun the guy who was a GOP POTUS 20 months ago.
- Runs away from their 2017 tax policy; Dobbs decision; FBI overreach.
Who in the GOP/independent should vote GOP?
Explain👇🏼
This is without getting into the fact that the @HouseGOP a few years back with 241 seats delivered less on basic GOP policy than @HouseDemocrats with 220 seats delivered on Radical Lefty policies.
If you have some time, read Chapter Five (page 71) of the IG report on how @Comey's FBI went about Hillary's emails. For example, the feds got "consent" to search "most" (not all Clinton devices).
What I didn't know until today is that the classified (including top secret) emails found in #ButHerEmails were only among the 30K+ emails handed over by Clinton's staff and not the 31K+ they deleted under claim that it was "personal."
Feds "Did not seek to obtain every device including those of Clinton’s senior aides, or the contents of every email account... Reasons for not doing so were based on limitations the Midyear team imposed... [with] the desire to complete the investigation well before the election."
1/4 On Inauguration Day, the outgoing POTUS does not personally have physical access to classified documents to fill 25 boxes at will and to secretly direct the movers to corruptly whisk it away. So any talk of Trump "stealing/taking" boxes of such documents is a clown show.
2/4 Can a new admin claim that some documents should not have been given? Yes. But if you read beyond the clickbait headlines and dramatic intros, the "concern" was the security. Did Bush 43 check Clinton's security at Chappaqua?
3/4 Basically, staffers decide which docs can go with a POTUS, but senior people in a new admin have the legal (corruptly-used) power to claim that some documents were given by mistake and can also claim (corruptly) that it's not securely stored; hence the new locks in June. 😃