Yes yes @EWErickson. Let us all ignore a politically abusive, unheard of raid on a former POTUS.

This is after Dems IMPEACHED Trump over Ukraine and then went on to win the WH and Senate too.

Oh, they had won the house despite HARASSING/Obstructing Trump.
Erickson's big message plan for the GOP:

- Opposition to #DefundThePolice; a topic dead now but Dems won in 2020 when it was alive.

- Opposing Biden's #StudentLoanForgivness which wasn't a topic before today.

- To yell about the IRS that a House GOP has little power over.

🤡
In his tweets, @EWErickson failed to mention

- Inflation & Lawless Border.

- Strong Conservative SCOTUS rulings.

- Biden Corruption (Dems ran on Trump "Corruption" from Day One and won the House in 2018).

TBH. I don't have more stuff because the DC GOP is anyway useless. 🤡
Regarding the "brilliant" point by @EWErickson that the GOP should campaign against Student Loan Fogginess (the way Cocaine Mitch opposed $2K checks pre-GASen runoffs and then lost the 2 seats which EW blames on Trump who favored the checks): @Cernovich has a good take 👇🏼

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yossi Gestetner

Yossi Gestetner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YossiGestetner

Aug 25
Hello folks. We always knew that the economy growing/falling is based on Gross Domestic Product data which the BEA confirmed today did in fact fall in Q2 after falling in Q1.

Jason saying the "economy grew" is his unilateral redefining of the economy by adding another data set.
2/ When the initial GDP data for the Second Quarter was released a month ago, Dems and their media drove the message that two negative quarters of GDP does not mean a recession. It is also dependent on the job market; a line hardly-if-ever before used when defining recession.
3/ Now that the Second Quarter data was revised and it is still showing a negative, we get sold a new claim:

Recession is when Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Gross Domestic Income (GDI) are both negative by calculating them together. @jasonfurman said it and also Bloomberg 👇🏼 Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 24
The GOP machine in DC...

- Voted with Biden on multiple key issues which means they can't attack it.

- Shun the guy who was a GOP POTUS 20 months ago.

- Runs away from their 2017 tax policy; Dobbs decision; FBI overreach.

Who in the GOP/independent should vote GOP?

Explain👇🏼
This is without getting into the fact that the @HouseGOP a few years back with 241 seats delivered less on basic GOP policy than @HouseDemocrats with 220 seats delivered on Radical Lefty policies.

cc @jackpandol @MarkBednar @SamLBullock @M_McAdams @MikeKBerg @tomemmer
Senate GOP

- gave Biden more judges than any POTUS since JFK! Schumer with less seats than the GOP now blocked Trump more!

- said "let Mueller finish his job" for 21 months AND had their own 4 year collusion investigation, yet shot down any talk of 2020!

= Trump voters 😴
Read 26 tweets
Aug 14
If you have some time, read Chapter Five (page 71) of the IG report on how @Comey's FBI went about Hillary's emails. For example, the feds got "consent" to search "most" (not all Clinton devices).

Fun stuff because #NoOneIsAboveTheLaw

justice.gov/file/1071991/d…
What I didn't know until today is that the classified (including top secret) emails found in #ButHerEmails were only among the 30K+ emails handed over by Clinton's staff and not the 31K+ they deleted under claim that it was "personal."
Feds "Did not seek to obtain every device including those of Clinton’s senior aides, or the contents of every email account... Reasons for not doing so were based on limitations the Midyear team imposed... [with] the desire to complete the investigation well before the election."
Read 4 tweets
Aug 12
1/4 On Inauguration Day, the outgoing POTUS does not personally have physical access to classified documents to fill 25 boxes at will and to secretly direct the movers to corruptly whisk it away. So any talk of Trump "stealing/taking" boxes of such documents is a clown show.
2/4 Can a new admin claim that some documents should not have been given? Yes. But if you read beyond the clickbait headlines and dramatic intros, the "concern" was the security. Did Bush 43 check Clinton's security at Chappaqua?

From the NYT via @politicalwire:
3/4 Basically, staffers decide which docs can go with a POTUS, but senior people in a new admin have the legal (corruptly-used) power to claim that some documents were given by mistake and can also claim (corruptly) that it's not securely stored; hence the new locks in June. 😃
Read 5 tweets
Aug 12
🚨 🚨 🚨

There were 10 boxes of nuclear secrets laying around at MAL for 18 months tucked into Melania's cloths that it took 30 agents 9 hours to collect.

3:00 PM: Garland Asks How Dare You Critique the Feds.

5:00 PM: FBI Wray Echos the Same Points.

8:00 PM: Those Upstanding Above Board Feds Leak an Incomplete/Misleading Claim About Nuclear Secrets to a State-Aligned Press Office.
In a matter of 8 hours we went from "this isn't a raid and Garland didn't even know about it,"

to

"Of course GARLAND approved a RAID: We needed to save NUCLEAR DOCS from Trump!"

Soon they will say Biden was briefed due to the risk, but he deferred to DOJ "career officials."
Read 11 tweets
Aug 11
A) Why buy a self-serving claim about Garland's role?

B) Subordinates taking action on their own "for good of country/law" is a tool for corrupt abuse in authoritarian regimes.

Same goes for Gen Milley. He can't decide what's good for country over orders of Commander in Chief.
It's funny and sad to listen to CBS, ABC and other networks pro-government propaganda as we await Garland's presser.

Sad how "media" isn't behaving adverserial to government action.

Funny because their wording and lines can easily be refuted if they were, well, media; not PR.
Many commentators on Dem TV argued that the raid neded to be much more than classified documents or else they would not make a raid.

Haha. Really?

Anyway. Let's see Garland's spin and how those commentators will "explain" that classified docs are enough to have raided.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(