@kennycooks This isn't about teams or sides or supporting any candidate over another. I fundamentally don't even support the role of DA as it currently stands in our system, so I honestly hardly care which of the two candidates with nearly identical policies wins. But I do care about this.
I honestly thought it was bizarre enough that I was being asked to get behind a candidate who had never entered an appearance as counsel in the court all of his most serious charging decisions as DA would be heard in, but it seems we're way past that now
Otherwise: Wouldn't blame you if you missed it, but the Globe already reluctantly acknowledged in passing weeks ago that Hayden's office had proven that he'd always been working the case inherited from the prior admin they had tried to manufacture a scandal around him not working
Arroyo + supporters have claimed w/o evidence since the 1st Globe story on these allegations that Hayden's office feloniously leaked reports of *sexual assaults on minors* for political advantage. Absolutely disqualifying if true for sure! But unlikely imo for any # of reasons
It is a strange but understandable reality of progressive politics that extensive experience as a prosecutor is one of the most disqualifying strikes against seeking election as a prosecutor--even someone apparently happy to work closely w/1 of the most progressive DAs in the US
Backing Rachael Rollins over her white conservative opponents was an easy call last time around, especially given her commitment to a new direction for #SuffolkDA.
Hayden may, as public servants often are, be a cipher. But he's also never lied about committing sexual assault.
N.B.: As someone who wants to see the #SuffolkDA's office become something that neither candidate--and no other candidate I've ever heard of--would ever be able to seriously run on my desires weren't going to be reflected by my vote. No shade on anyone who sits this one out tbh
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
WHERE WERE YOU when you heard that the former president who'd already taken a dry run at a coup spent an hour publicly explaining exactly what kind of dictator he would be + how he would do it which the media covered as a "policy" speech?
I was on my annual summer vacation on Block Island, RI. This was both the best and worst possible time to start to process what I'd just heard this man say
🛑🛑🛑!!!!
I know there are more pleasant things on your feed rn and I am truly sorry to do this but please take a minute to consider that everything in this quote is literally true. Not even a pinch of hyperbole. Really put everything down and sit with it right now.
The fact that it would take me upwards of 10 minutes on a whiteboard to prove the basic context you'd need to fully understand my subsequent 10 minute rant goes a long way in itself to explain how "unspeakably inhumane" has become the default setting for US immigration policy
In short: this provision already permanently separates families over nothing. This interpretation will separate many more families in the largest federal circuit over nothing.
The Trump family separation crisis was a multimedia flashpoint of injustice anyone could see + understand. But the 25-yr family separation crisis this decision exacerbates was enthusiastically passed into law by Dems, including the one now running the country, in #IIRIRA. #Fix96
in an unexpected burst of good news at the merciful end of the worst term in modern #SCOTUS history, the court has agreed that the #RemaininMexico program was properly terminated by the Biden administration
still reading, but on its face this outcome is a tremendous relief for all of us involved in this work and a definitive statement to the next R administration that they can't outsource our asylum processing to other countries
#MPP was one of the cruelest & most radical policies of an administration elected to perform radical cruelty on some of the most vulnerable people in the world. Its recission does not fix our asylum system, but preserves it
The Christian Republic of Texas. The Catholic State of Missouri. The Evangelical Commonwealth of Virginia.
This is it. This is where it's all been going, and at this pace they could have it by the end of the next #SCOTUS term.
Before 2016, America First Legal would have been considered an extremist fringe movement. Today, it is a leading voice of "conservative" legal "thought" led by 2 of the Trump admin's worst.
It's like seeing a Bond villain publish his plans in a press release
Given Gorsuch's total absence of legal reasoning in #Kennedy & reliance on "history and tradition" arguments, I don't see how this #SCOTUS doesn't accept the argument that the Establishment Clause was only intended to apply to the federal government and not the states
Refreshing #SCOTUS site while waiting on a hearing in #Dorchester hoping to vacate the decades-old case which resulted in my client's deportation eager to learn which of our rights the elder gods deign fit to preserve. Thurgood Marshall is on the wall, + he doesn't look happy
I continue to believe they'll hold Dobbs until the very end--as they always do for the big ones--but literally on the edge of my seat for the #MPP decision
In this courtroom full of Black faces a white judge is being assisted by white clerks, white court officers, + a white probation rep while white prosecutors + defense attorneys (including me ofc) litigate cases controlled by white-majority SJC + SCOTUS rulings. Welcome to Boston