Been thinking a lot about how #PatientPartners in #Research are asked to provide a letter of support and a CV or 'applicant profile' for grant applications. These have changed a bit over the years, but I struggle with a few things #PatientEngagement .../1
First I struggle that the letter of support or CV/applicant profile (see cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/51872.html) are very similar to what is expected of others on the research team, who usually bring really different experiences/knowledge compared to #PatientPartners#PatientEngagement.../2
.. I hope I articulate this well. As a #PatientPartner on a grant appln, I typically share very personal things about my condition/healthcare experiences. After all, I'm trying to express my support and how the research is relevant, but if I step back, I ask: to what end? .../3
....writing these letters of support or sharing these experiences in the application itself also bring up a whole spectrum of emotions- and I'm not even a member of a funded team yet! #PatientEngagement .../4
and then I think about the ask that I provide a CV or an applicant profile and I wonder how I'm 'judged' and if I've justified *well enough* how I have the right 'patient experience' to be considered a #PatientParnter on the research team. #PatientEngagement .../5
I guess it just feels to me that the #LivedExperience#PatientPartners bring is hard to 'adjudicate' or quantify in the typical way that academics do about other team members who have formal training and other academic 'indicators' ....#PatientEngagement .../6
Brings me to question why we can't be a more creative about what we ask of #PatientPartners on research teams applying for grants. We keep using the current processes as that's easiest, but it doesn't feel great or really 'fit' as a patient partner #PatientEngagement .../7
And maybe it's just me... and I'd love to hear others' thoughts about this. What could we do to make things easier for #PatientPartners who are on these research teams, and to make the processes/asks of them really work? #PatientEngagement .../end (I think!)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sharing a short 🧵 of #PatientEngagement in #Research resources co-created by & approaches to working w/ #PatientPartners in @cpn_rdc. CPN is funded by @CIHR_IRSC's Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research initiative & I've had the privilege to help with its #PE work .../1
#PatientPartners are part CPN's governance as co-chairs of and members on all committees. More about CPN here cpn.mcmaster.ca, and its #PatientEngagement Cttee is tasked with carrying out its #PE work. The Cttee is mostly ppl who live with #Pain & a few researchers...2
I spend a lot of time thinking and writing about, and advocating for #PatientPartner#compensation or #payment as part of research or other teams. I'm going to share some resources and thoughts as I've been asked lately about this 🧵.../1
For me it's best practice to offer #PatientPartners compensation (I'm going to use that term to mean the same thing as payment), and:
👉not everyone wants it - cool
👉some people will ask for flexibility in payment
👉if you don't have a budget for this, be transparent
.../2
If you're offended or defensive about my last tweet 👆re: 'best practice to offer #PatientPartners#compensation' - I'm ok with that, but you're not going to change my mind. In my experience, you represent a specific demographic that has the privilege to feel that way. ..../3
Sharing a few tweets of resources we've developed @clinicaltrialON in the past year to help people engage with #clinicaltrials (as participants or as collaborators on research teams). Thank you to our partners who have helped us. #talkclinicaltrials /1