I just have to wonder what is truly considered classified and not classified. Obviously the only people that truly know are the ones with access to those compartments, which are classified. So if you don't have clearance, you don't actually have any clue.
If someone who's worked for NASA (directly or indirectly as a contractor) claims that X isn't classified, there are 3 possibilities: 1. They know it's classified and are lying. This is a sign of psychological instability or another problem, and we can get their clearance yanked.
2. They have no idea because they never had a clearance or access to those compartments, and are just clueless. Or they potentially suffer from Cognitive Dissonance.
3. They have no idea because they never had a clearance or access to those compartments, and are idiots.
Also this applies to anyone who's worked for them in any capacity:
I've been talking to a lot of people online & offline, and NASA's brand has been damaged way more than I thought.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We've already reached what appears to be "Disclosure - Level 1". This 2018 video is a form of "soft" disclosure. Much has been declassified already and the people involved can talk:
It's going to probably take them 20+ years to push Disclosure to increasingly higher levels.
Probably 20 years because this is the time period Dr. Alexander Wendt said at his SCU AAPC 202 conference presentation.
It seems Disclosure is not a binary event, but analog and done quietly so the information can spread slowly and naturally outwards. This would help avoid ontological shock and other issues.
The American NatSec state is strange. ex-CIA GS-15 John Ramirez stated that he was not a whistleblower, i.e. he had 100% permission to talk. He stated the JWST had a special set of coordinates to check. Now we have rumors of KIC 8462852, "QLAD", "hidden" time, etc.
The supposed leaked document floating around on the web fits all the classic patterns of a Majestic-style release, too. Some of the phrases in there are extremely specialized/rare, or somewhat obscure. It's not your everyday average fake doc.
I also see clear signs of an anti-Lazar-style effort to discredit the "leak". If it's a Majestic-style release it'll contain a mix of disinfo and real info, or be composed in a discreditable way. It's like a message, but only for people or groups that can handle it.
A common misconception is the US gov's interest in UAP's/UFO's stopped after Blue Book ended. No, just the purely PR side stopped. Sightings explicitly impacting National Security were still handled as usual:
There are two hands with stuff like this, like a magic show. The left hand says "nope there is no value here at all" while the right hand simultaneously says "this impacts NatSec; need to continue studying". The left hand was purely for PR purposes.
Dr. Robert Sarbacher (DoD) was interviewed by Stanton Friedman in the 80's, and spoke of the significance of bismuth and gravity. In 2018, Dr. Hal Puthoff spoke of an unusual metamaterial sample containing bismuth layers.
To make matters even more interesting, Dr. Sarbacher said this about Scully's book on the 1948 Aztec crash retrieval event: "The facts reported in the book are substantially correct." luforu.org/smith-sarbache…
If someone without a security clearance tells you something isn't classified, they don't know.
If someone with a clearance says that, they could be lying. But that could be a sign of psychological instability (or something else), and they could lose their clearance. #ufotwitter
If someone without a security clearance tells you something isn't classified, they could also be idiots.
We need to know the "rules" about this subject in particular. This is what I've been able to figure out so far.
Here's Dr. Eric W. Davis who gave 2 classified briefings to the Senate in 2019, saying there have been UAP crashes and "there's a craft". He also speaks of a "Crash Retrieval Program". This link starts at the key part (it's a long interview):