Eric Baxter Profile picture
Sep 4 10 tweets 2 min read
Now that briefing is wrapped up for Yeshiva’s still-pending #SCOTUS application, I have to say how miraculous it feels to have seen so much amicus support for Yeshiva—literally from around the globe.
Some of our amici, like Professor Doug Laycock, were already preparing briefs in a separate state-court appeal that is being briefed right now (though it won’t be decided until next year).
Although we didn’t know we’d be appealing to #SCOTUS until we were denied a stay by two different NY courts last week, those amici were willing to quickly repurpose their briefs when we found out on Monday that a response had been requested.
Others we could only ask for amicus support for the first time on Monday. Of course, many friends simply couldn’t file a brief that would be due just 4 days later. But others put everything aside to draft a brief on an accelerated timeframe.
We are supremely grateful to those who were able to make the sacrifice to draft and file a brief, as well as those who have supported us in so many other ways.
Amici are showing up because they care about Yeshiva’s right to interpret and apply Torah on its own campus, free from government coercion
For example, I was touched that the Chief Rabbi of Ukraine wrote to SCOTUS that, despite “6 months of chaos, conflict, and struggle,” he found it of “utmost importance” to defend Yeshiva’s role as a beacon for Jewish leaders and communities worldwide: supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/2…
None of this would have been necessary but for the state courts’ extraordinary order that Yeshiva “immediately” reverse its religious decision, and those courts’ sudden refusal last week to protect Yeshiva while the appeal process plays out.
(As an aside, we’re also grateful there are no opposing amici, although we’re not sure why. Plaintiffs have amicus support in the NY trial and appellate courts – perhaps their SCOTUS brief was less convincing?)
Ultimately the wave of support for Yeshiva shows that religious groups understand what is at stake in this case. If a court can say Yeshiva is not religious and can’t uphold its Torah values on its own campus, all religious institutions are at risk. Few cases will be more vital.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eric Baxter

Eric Baxter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @esbax

Apr 23, 2021
#BREAKING: Catholic & Anglican nuns, Roman Catholic dioceses, Baptist & Lutheran churches and other religious ministries just asked #SCOTUS to protect them against the State of New York’s mandate that all employers cover abortions in their health plans. becketnewsite.s3.amazonaws.com/Roman-Catholic…
It all goes back to the 2011 #HHS mandate—the same one the Little Sisters of the Poor have been fighting for a decade. In 2017—when the Little Sisters were already 2 #SCOTUS victories in—NY created a similar state-wide mandate, but this time requiring coverage for abortion.
NY’s mandate narrowly exempts religious entities that primarily employ and serve those of their own faith, but religious orgs that employ and serve people regardless of faith must pay.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 13, 2019
1/ A diverse group of amici and prominent legal scholars just urged #SCOTUS to take an important new religious freedom case. Here’s the story: [THREAD]
2/ Last term, 4 justices—Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh—suggested it was time to reconsider #SCOTUS precedent that “drastically cut back on the protection provided by the Free Exercise Clause.”
supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf…
3/ Last month, @BecketLaw filed a cert petition that offers SCOTUS the chance to do just that: reconsider Employment Division v. Smith, and let a devout man have his career back. The case is Ricks v. Idaho Board of Contractors. s3.amazonaws.com/becketnewsite/…; becketlaw.org/case/ricks-v-i…
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(