2/A “syndromic appearing” young adult pt who was a poor historian & could not specify any prior diagnosis, p/w left neck swelling. On CTA, calling the IJ supersized would have been an understatement
3/Posterior to the IJ was a tangle of vessels, but no identifiable soft tissue mass, concerning for a vascular malformation. Catheter angiography showed a Jackson Pollack painting appearance of tangled vessels consistent with an AVM
4/But it was more complicated than that. Although there was an AVM, there were also signs of a low flow lesion as well. There was non-enhancing soft tissue & phleboliths that looked more like a venolymphatic. But an enlarged main pulmonary trunk indicated a high flow lesion.
5/And among the vascular malformation was all this extra fat. It didn’t look like an encapsulated lipoma. It was more like just overgrowth of the fat in this region—don’t we all have problems with a little bit of fatty overgrowth! 😉
6/An MRI of the brain showed a Chiari 1 and bright spots in the cerebellum that looked like the UBO (unidentified bright objects) one sees in neurofibromatosis 1 pts. But this patient had no other stigmata of NF1.
7/So we have a vascular malformation (mixed high & low flow) & lipomatous overgrowth. This is CLOVES syndrome (Congenital Lipomatous Overgrowth w/combined-type Vascular malformations, Epidermal naevi, Skeletal anomalies). They can also have posterior fossa abnormalities.
8/CLOVES actually falls under the umbrella of a spectrum of vascular abnormalities/lipomatous overgrowth syndromes—the most famous being Proteus syndrome—the syndrome the elephant man had. I never thought I would come across a disease that is a variant of the elephant man!
9/So next time you see a vascular malformation & lipomatous overgrowth—think of this umbrella of PROS syndromes—even if you are an adult neuroradiologist like me who NEVER sees such syndromes (real life picture of me below every time pediatric pathology comes across my screen)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Need help reading spine imaging? I’ve got your back!
It’s as easy as ABC!
A thread about an easy mnemonic you can use on every single spine study you see to increase your speed & make sure you never miss a thing!
2/A is for alignment
Look for: (1) Unstable injuries
(2) Malalignment that causes early degenerative change. Abnormal motion causes spinal elements to abnormally move against each other, like grinding teeth wears down teeth—this wears down the spine
3/B is for bones.
On CT, the most important thing to look for w/bones is fractures. You may see focal bony lesions, but you may not
On MR, it is the opposite—you can see marrow lesions easily but you may or may not see edema associated w/fractures if the fracture is subtle
@TheAJNR 2/Vascular cognitive impairment, or its most serious form, vascular dementia, used to be called multi-infarct dementia.
It was thought dementia directly resulted from brain volume loss from infarcts, w/the thought that 50-100cc of infarcted related volume loss caused dementia
@TheAJNR 3/But that’s now outdated. We now know vascular dementia results from diverse pathologies that all share a common vascular origin.
It’s possible to lose little volume from infarct & still result in dementia.
So if infarcts are common—which contribute to vascular dementia?
@TheAJNR 2/In the lumbar spine, it is all about the degree of canal narrowing & room for nerve roots.
In the cervical spine, we have another factor to think about—the cord.
Cord integrity is key. No matter the degree of stenosis, if the cord isn’t happy, the patient won’t be either
@TheAJNR 3/Cord flattening, even w/o canal stenosis, can cause myelopathy.
No one is quite sure why.
Some say it’s b/c mass effect on static imaging may be much worse dynamically, some say repetitive microtrauma, & some say micro-ischemia from compression of perforators