2/A “syndromic appearing” young adult pt who was a poor historian & could not specify any prior diagnosis, p/w left neck swelling. On CTA, calling the IJ supersized would have been an understatement
3/Posterior to the IJ was a tangle of vessels, but no identifiable soft tissue mass, concerning for a vascular malformation. Catheter angiography showed a Jackson Pollack painting appearance of tangled vessels consistent with an AVM
4/But it was more complicated than that. Although there was an AVM, there were also signs of a low flow lesion as well. There was non-enhancing soft tissue & phleboliths that looked more like a venolymphatic. But an enlarged main pulmonary trunk indicated a high flow lesion.
5/And among the vascular malformation was all this extra fat. It didn’t look like an encapsulated lipoma. It was more like just overgrowth of the fat in this region—don’t we all have problems with a little bit of fatty overgrowth! 😉
6/An MRI of the brain showed a Chiari 1 and bright spots in the cerebellum that looked like the UBO (unidentified bright objects) one sees in neurofibromatosis 1 pts. But this patient had no other stigmata of NF1.
7/So we have a vascular malformation (mixed high & low flow) & lipomatous overgrowth. This is CLOVES syndrome (Congenital Lipomatous Overgrowth w/combined-type Vascular malformations, Epidermal naevi, Skeletal anomalies). They can also have posterior fossa abnormalities.
8/CLOVES actually falls under the umbrella of a spectrum of vascular abnormalities/lipomatous overgrowth syndromes—the most famous being Proteus syndrome—the syndrome the elephant man had. I never thought I would come across a disease that is a variant of the elephant man!
9/So next time you see a vascular malformation & lipomatous overgrowth—think of this umbrella of PROS syndromes—even if you are an adult neuroradiologist like me who NEVER sees such syndromes (real life picture of me below every time pediatric pathology comes across my screen)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/The 90s called & wants its carotid imaging back!
It’s been 30 years--why are you still just quoting NASCET?
Do you feel vulnerable when it comes to identifying plaque vulnerability?
Here’s a thread to help you identify high risk plaques with carotid plaque imaging
2/Everyone knows the NASCET criteria:
If the patient is symptomatic & the greatest stenosis from the plaque is >70% of the diameter of normal distal lumen, patient will likely benefit from carotid endarterectomy.
But that doesn’t mean the remaining patients are just fine!
3/Yes, carotid plaques resulting in high grade stenosis are high risk.
But assuming that stenosis is the only mechanism by which a carotid plaque is high risk is like assuming that the only way to kill someone is by strangulation.
1/I always say you can tell a bad read on a spine MR if it doesn’t talk about lateral recesses.
What will I think when I see your read? Do you rate lateral recess stenosis?
Here’s a thread on lateral recess anatomy & a grading system for lateral recess stenosis
2/First anatomy.
Thecal sac is like a highway, carrying the nerve roots down the lumbar spine.
Lateral recess is part of the lateral lumbar canal, which is essentially the exit for spinal nerve roots to get off the thecal sac highway & head out into the rest of the body
3/Exits have 3 main parts.
First is the deceleration lane, where the car slows down as it starts the process of exiting.
Then there is the off ramp itself, and this leads into the service road which takes the car to the roads that it needs to get to its destination
3/At its most basic, you can think of the PPF as a room with 4 doors opening to each of these regions: one posteriorly to the skullbase, one medially to the nasal cavity, one laterally to the infratemporal fossa, and one anteriorly to the orbit