As someone trained in scholarly editing, I'm encouraging us to EXPLAIN the choice of an edition. After teaching the 18th century novel for over a decade (including w/digital 1st editions), most newcomers to early novels NEED the editorial support a modern edition provides. 🧵
A LOT of stuff is in the public domain -- including entire textbooks written to be Open Access, and some scholarly/teaching editions made freely available! By all means, use them if you've got them. Hell, part of my job (the @18thConnect part) is to help make more discoverable.
But for an 18th centuryist like me, using sites that make public domain editions of works available (bless them) means either the 1st edition of a novel (Hathi) or 19th century editions (Gutenberg). Neither will have explanatory notes or contextual info.
But that's just Prob 1.
The *bigger* problem is harder to note: 19th century editors often played merry hell with earlier texts. Y'all, this is the century that coined the term "Bowdlerization" (a form of censorship that shaped texts to fit perceived "standards")
I could go on about this but I'm low on spoons, but it suffices to say that relying on 19th century editions of 18th century (or earlier) works is asking for a real bad time. I know what those editors thought about "lady novelists" (for example) -- I don't trust their judgment.
TL,DR: the cost of *textbooks* is often extortionately high, built on a system of planned obsolescence & rental fuckery.
What is ALSO true is that editorial work matters, & teaching editions are vital to the study of works outside our own context. We need to explain this more.
Finally, a plug for one of the best examples of when a modern edition matters: the Anonymous 1808 novel THE WOMAN OF COLOR, edited by Dr. Lyndon Dominique with an *enormous* supporting apparatus, including a timeline of heiresses of color in prose fiction. broadviewpress.com/product/the-wo…
BTW: please DO read 18th century novels. Read stuff written in the actual #Regency alongside your #Bridgerton fix. Modern Regency is delightful, but it shows us who WE are. Regency-era fiction gives us a better understanding of who #Austen & her contemporaries thought THEY were.
Also, when our students hunt down cheaper editions of the books we assign, they often find garbage Print on Demand copies that are incomprehensible messes, or in some cases, even wilder stuff, as Dr. Shanafelt reports:
Howdy new followers! It’s Thursday, & we experience most strikingly the distinction between live performance & prerecorded #ttrpg actual play tonight. #CriticalRoleSpoilers in this thread in an hour — mute as needed.
Shirt is by Coalition of Master's Scholars on Material Culture @_CMSMC_ from their original design -- tons of cool variants now: cmsmc.org/shop (not an ad, just citing to thwart dumb algo bots & because everyone needs a "Girls Just Wanna Have Funding" sweatshirt)
Note: we've restarted a few times, so we're 10 minutes away from start, and a total a 4 hour 15 run tonight, so play time of well under 4 tonight (say, 3.30-45).
Today in the #Austen game course we discuss a novel that hasn't been gameified (& rarely adapted): MANSFIELD PARK. I'm so glad to have the brilliant @MarcosSGonsalez to read alongside, both in print & in-(virtual)-person.
Morning, folks. It’s set to be a strange day for the British Literary Historian part of my brain. But my #ttrpg actual play brain is 1st up today as we welcome @alexchalk_phd to class & discuss his recent article on production networks in actual play.
His piece: Chalk, Alex. “Mapping an Online Production Network: The Field of ‘Actual Play’ Media.” Convergence, (May 2022). doi.org/10.1177/135485…
Dr. Chalk's work uses Latour's Actor Network Theory (ANT) to describe the shifting relationship networks, as well as the circumstances of labor, in #ttrpg actual play production, drawing on 24 anonymized interviews with AP producers.
Hey Pack of Pixies, I’m keeping up with the reading — er, viewing — this week though a bit under the weather still. I’ll be taking my usual #acourtoffeyandflowers notes right when the episode drops tonight. I reserve the right to be goofy, but what’s new.
Shirt is ancient Threadless from the previous millennium. I think it actually might count as vintage by now.
Tonight's episode runtime: 2:09. And hey, we get a transformation of the #acourtoffeyandflowers intro, with @SurenaXMarie now officially known by her real name, Binx Choppley!