#OpenRAN is a "huge journey" and "painful process"
Needs lots of efforts to commercialise. DT recognises 6 strands:
- O-RAN town deployed on a live network
- SMO & automation
- Skills (hugely needed)
- New operating model, eg inhouse SI?
- Foster ecosystem
- Vendor selection
@1und1 is doing 24 edge data centres with CUs + 500+ local DCs with DUs (max distance 10km from radio)
That’s impressive - 3 millisecond latency in friendly user trial.
Launching FWA by end of 2022
Next up is @ngvoice talking about how smaller vendors & innovators can work with MNOs
(wonder if they'll mention how most telcos' procurement, payment and supplier-management systems are very bad at dealing with small companies. Onboarding, invoicing etc is usually a nightmare)
Cool slide on the resource needs of containerised / microservices network functions vs traditional monolithic platforms
It amazes me that telcos talk so emphatically about platforms, APIs & developers, when they’re so badly set up for commercial relationships with small companies & individuals
Looking forward to this 10-speaker session on #6G and panel moderated by @cmendler
Kicked off by a speaker from @OECD . Not convinced by the 1GB/second claim for autonomous vehicles…
Curious to see how long before we get before mentions of “indoors” or “network sharin
Amused by this slide.
All indoor uses, or on a form of transport
Some pragmatic comments here from OECD @WeberVere about link to fibre & WiFi
Not quite sure what “extreme low energy” means (it’s a @NTTDocomoNews slide), but some of the concepts I’ve seen for 6G are going to struggle with it - including the THz and mmWave mentioned in the next slide
Good to see refs to indoor & small-area repeaters for mmWave mentioned by DoCoMo, at least for 5G
Now up, a @VodafoneGroup futurist talking about 6G applications & use-cases vs 5G ones
Starts with usual caveats about forecasts being difficult & often wrong…
Curious to see how @NGMN_Alliance 6G use case categorisation differs from mine / Charlotte’s in recent 6G report
Some similarities
But misses core opportunities of better FWA and MBB
Lots of very generic things like healthcare (1000s of separate applications, most well suited to multiple network types)
I like this categorisation of disruptive technologies as often being *less* functionality but *more* convenient
- implies need for openness (APIs) and software
Good - VF speaker mentions lots of use-cases will be indoors
May be delivered over WiFi (or satellite).
“Not just a 3GPP connectivity layer”
Presentation from @Bell aligning 6G more with community & wider societal considerations
Good to see the words “feasible and deliverable” appear
Points out trade offs between “extreme this & that” vs “extreme low energy”
This is brilliant
Canadian speaker from @Bell was seated in 6G on his inbound flight
There’s a lot going on in these slides from @chinamobile
Good point about link/overlap with 5G Advanced
Also the x-disciplinary research models between different tech domains
China Mobile is the first speaker to stress desire for a unified global 6G standard
The idea that ITU should have just one candidate for 6G is utterly monopolistic & risks a dangerous monoculture. Attempted 3GPP capture which needs robust pushback
“Need to think environment-first”
Mobile networks - 93% of energy are in operations
I agree that traffic and energy use should be decoupled
Big push by Nokia for a single global standard for 6G
I think that may be unrealistic
Better to acknowledge now that 6G *may* be fragmented & design for APIs to allow gateways and interworking
We can’t predict 8 years of geopolitics, so we need to have contingency plans
Oh dear. Metaverse. Which is obviously going to be WiFi (or USB) primary, not 6G
I don’t think I’ve heard any references to private networks today. Given that @NGMN_Alliance is an MNO-member association I guess that’s unsurprising but I would have expected a bit more realism
By 2030 there will probably be 100K+ private network. MNOs will be a tiny minority
It’s here next year. By 2030 and 6G timeframe, it will be WiFi9+ I expect
This is the daftest slide today “in-network computing”
Apparently it’ll allow telcos to “kill” the “OTTs” in the 6G era
The speaker is the Deutsche Telekom Chair of Comms Networks at @tudresden_de btw
Asked the panel what they expect when 100K private networks (and their vendors) feed their requirements & expectations into 6G pathway
Not sure if they haven't thought about, or I phrased it badly, but got diverted to discussion about vertical groups like 5GACIA & 5GAA
Completely missed the *functional* aspects of more private networks than public networks
eg coordinating 1000's of separate networks per sq km, not 100000s of devices, or new ways of network-sharing with dynamic mix of uplink/downlink, or indoor-centric networks
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Notes GSMA stats (31% more traffic, 5%+ electricity, 2%+ CO2 in 2021) show that they are "decoupled". But notes that last number must fall
Interestingly that suggests to me one of the more absurd arguments I've heard recently "we must reign in data traffic growth to reduce CO2 emissions" or "don't send that email" (!!) is a fallacy.
We know it, sustainability advisers know it, so let's stop pretending bits = CO2
Curious to hear about experience with 5G / OpenRAN in domestic Japan market, as well as global traction with the Symphony platform
My initial takeout is that the Japan market seems to treat telecoms as "just another service" alongside the various other Rakuten offers in banking, commerce, gaming etc. Lot of discussion about how many people take 2+ services overall
Got 47.5K 4G base stations "on air" in Japan and 98% pop coverage. Aiming for 60K / 99% by end-2023
Big pitch on automation & redundancy. 70% of changes need no human intervention
For anyone wanting a proper read of what the Uk Government has announced today about @huawei and #5G and #FTTX networks, this document from @NCSC has a lot more detail than all the guff in the press
Actually discusses specific network elements affected
- I don't buy this idea today's rule change "delays 5G by 2-3 yrs"
- My sense is it allows the industry (& some in govt) to quietly back away from 5G's cult-like hype with a good excuse
- Many I speak to hadn't realised the cool "vision" stuff was always 2023+ anyway
Added to that, post-pandemic economic downturn would likely have slowed 5G deployment *anyway*
Even though the telecoms industry is doing OK, it will face some fallout - not least, people unwilling to upgrade to new £1000 phones, esp as they're using home bband & WiFi more now
Hmm @bt_uk Chief Strategy Office Michael Sherman kicking off @TheTelcoDebate#GTD19 with what sounds like a 1990s-era rant about Internet services / apps not being "free" & that pricing should reflect more than just Internet access
Sounds like a cliched telcos vs OTT trope
@bt_uk@TheTelcoDebate "We've given away huge amounts of value"
"You used to pay for an email account"
"We have to invest ever more in infrastructure"
Well, if you'd diverted some of that investment to internal R&D & app/service development, maybe you'd have captured more value, Mr Sherman? #GTD19
@bt_uk@TheTelcoDebate Now @nikwilletts@tmforumorg intro - a note of realism about telcos being geo fragmented & only realistically able to cover few (if any) verticals in depth for enterprise services. Partnership is key. #GTD19