It's #WorldSuicidePreventionDay!
As a suicidologist and someone who has experienced chronic suicidality since age 9, I want to offer some insights that mainstream prevention orgs don't often share. 🧵
Suicidal ideation does not mean a person needs to be immediately hospitalized against their will. A significant portion of the population experiences suicidal ideation and never acts on it. I'd argue that it's a "normal" response to many difficult life situations.
Suicidality isn't always episodic. That means that for some people, the desire to die never goes away. We wake up, think about it, and carry on with our day. I've seen this called "grey suicidality" online and it's fairly common. Again, not an emergency.
Reporting someone for being suicidal can get them kicked out of college & fired from jobs. It can even cause them to lose custody of their kids. Mandatory reporting policies are dangerous & are aimed at protecting businesses and organizations from liability, not helping people.
There are many ways to handle mental health crises that don't involve cops or involuntary psychiatric care. Access to childcare, meals, emergency funds, and affordable medical care can go a long way. Being in a community where people can talk openly about suicidality is huge.
The United Nations has called involuntary psychiatric care a form of torture but it's still regularly practiced on suicidal patients in the US. Involuntary 72-hour ("5150") holds are the norm for people deemed a threat to themselves. During this time, consent goes out the window.
5150 holds are one of the only legal circumstances in the USA where people can be forced to undergo medical treatments and ingest food or liquids against their will.
(The other circumstances include treatment of minors, intellectually disabled adults, and incarcerated people.)
Suicide risk following involuntary psychiatric hospitalization skyrockets. While 5150 holds may prevent a person from dying in one moment of crisis, they don't protect people long term.
#988Lifeline openly engages in nonconsensual active rescue despite its harms and lack of effectiveness. Callers seeking phone support can end up being escorted by police to a psychiatric hospital against their will--sometimes at gunpoint if the officers deem the person dangerous.
There are crisis hotlines that don't engage with police or nonconsensual active rescue. 988 is NOT one of these safe hotlines. Instead, check out @TransLifeline, @CallBlackLine, & @SamaritansNYC.
If you're looking to understand the perspectives of suicide survivors, @lttphoto has an incredible collection of narratives shared by these people. It's publicly available online. Definite content warnings though! They often discuss methods and other triggering concepts in depth.
If you want to read more about suicide and helping suicidal people from social justice perspectives, I highly recommend this book:
If you have differing perspectives, feel free to share. Psychiatric care has helped many people and it's not my goal to deny that. Instead, I want to have conversations about shifting conditions & policies that would enable more people to find helpful, non-carceral crisis care.
P.S. Please don't be a jerk in the replies. Take time to figure out how to share your thoughts without denying other people's experiences or dunking on them.
I really appreciate folks joining this conversation! Unfortunately I'm not able to reply to everyone, but please continue sharing resources & ideas. If you're currently in crisis, please reach out to safe loved ones or confidential resources in your area.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The journalist that interviewed me for this article said he wanted to better understand the criticisms of 988. In addition to talking to me, he spoke to @LizWinston9, a survivor of involuntary psychiatric care. Her quotes have since been removed, at her request. 🧵
The journalist reached out to both of us because we had popular social media posts cautioning people about 988. The article frames our posts as misinformation with no evidence other than the fact that people who work for 988 say our critiques are misguided/irrelevant.
Our posts are NOT misinformation. In fact, I offered to send the journalist peer-reviewed articles that demonstrate the long-term harms (including increased suicide rates!) stemming from involuntary psych care. He never followed up. We also talked about how the UN has classed...
My research as a critical suicidologist means I often critique nonconsensual (carceral) psychiatric care. Lots of people have asked what I recommend as an alternative. 🧵
First of all, this is a fantastic question! While we critique oppressive systems, we also need to build and support better alternatives. Here are some ideas:
1. When it comes to mandated reporting in schools, we can follow the lead of recent shifts in sexual violence reporting procedures. Instead of always involving police or formal reports, most colleges now simply reach out to the student with a list of potential resources.
Thoughts from a suicidologist on the new 988 crisis hotline: 1. Having a simple number is good. 2. Having more trained crisis teams is good. 2. It's still linked to nonconsensual active rescue which means they can & will trace your call & send police if they deem it necessary.
This is hugely problematic & a barrier for folks who want help. They won't call if they know it's not truly confidential. This is for a good reason, as people can & do get fired from jobs, lose housing, lose access to their kids, etc. after being deemed a danger to themselves.
Second, police kill people with actual or assumed mental illnesses at very high rates, and they're rarely trained for mental health crisis intervention. They're also an organization based on containment and punishment, not care or healing.
#AcademicTwitter: What are the best ways you've made and/or seen college instructors make courses more accessible?
Some peers asked me for tips so I’ll start with my own, but please add to the list! I’m always looking to learn about more best practices and ideas. 🧵
The biggest tip: 1. Don't wait until a student hands you an accommodations form to start thinking about accessibility.
2. Don't require doctor's notes for absences/makeup exams. They’re expensive and create unnecessary appointments. Just trust your students. If they're lying, it'll catch them someday.
On unsolicited advice for chronically ill folks: Why do we get so upset when you recommend a book, diet, vitamin, exercise, essential oil, tea, meditation, etc?
1. Because it’s condescending. It suggests that we haven’t done our own research, or aren’t smart enough to consider these ideas. (Anyone recommending yoga or veganism, this is for you. It’s not like we haven’t heard of these things.)
2. Because it feels like victim blaming. It insinuates that it’s our choice to be sick because we don’t want to try new ideas, or we’re just too lazy or closed-minded to do so.
(Truly, if our conditions had easy & accessible cures, we wouldn’t be sick!)
This semester my @UUtah Disability & Comm students did Community Activism Projects instead of exams. They identified an issue related to disability and access in their communities, then spent the semester planning and doing something about it.
The projects were AMAZING. 🧵
The only rule was that the projects had to be outward-facing and engage audiences beyond our class, which is why I’m sharing a few here.
There were several more, including some personal/medical ones that I’m not sharing for the sake of privacy, but they were just as awesome.
One duo conducted surveys about disability and access in the U’s Greek Life recruitment practices. They created a detailed report of the results and included research-based recommendations for future practices, which they presented to the U’s Panhellenic Council.