As an example of Twitter "labelling facts as misinformation" Lorenz cites Henry I. Miller who was forced to take down a tweet on vaccines.
But who is Henry I. Miller, you might ask?
Excellent question. Have you heard of #Monsanto? How about Big Tobacco? /2
The NY Times @dannyhakim exposed Miller for running an article at Forbes that was ghostwritten for Miller by #Monsanto. nytimes.com/2017/08/01/bus… When Monsanto pitched Miller about what they had written, Miller responded that he wanted "a high-quality draft" from Monsanto. /3
And if you search the Tobacco Archives, you can find 150 documents w/ Henry I. Miller's name, dating from when he was promoting tobacco disinformation. industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/results/#q=%22… Miller has been a corporate shill for decades. /4
The point is that Taylor Lorenz, like many nouveau disinformation reporters, doesn't have a damn clue what she's doing. She just hops on social media and starts spitting out words.
This is exactly why I started The DisInformation Chronicle disinformationchronicle.substack.com /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
REDFIELD: “Tony and I are friends, but we don't agree on this at all,” Redfield told me. “The potential for conspiracy is really on the other side. The conspiracy is Collins, Fauci, and the established scientific community that has acted in an antithetical way to science.” /2
REDFIELD: "The COVID epidemic obviously didn't start in December; it actually started way back in August, or maybe September in Wuhan." /3
My latest investigation for @bmj_latest "Stealing from the tobacco playbook, fossil fuel companies pour money into elite American universities" bmj.com/content/378/bm… /1
In at least one instance, fossil fuel funded academics shifted national policy. A paper on fracking published by MIT set off a fracking boom in the US. MIT tells BMJ that they stand behind the paper, which was funded by fossil fuel interests. bmj.com/content/378/bm… /2
Premier Journal Publishes Study Finding Serious Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines, Despite Three Dodgy Fact Checks and Facebook Censoring disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/the-journal-…
Do fact check outlets serve as bodyguards for biomedical companies and those in power? /1
When first published as a preprint, the study spurred not 1, not 2, but 3 different fact checks—all of which threw cold water on the study. What is the point of these fact checkers? /2
CDC Now Says COVID-19 Prior Infection Same as Vaccination, Let Us Now Commence the Great Misremembering disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/cdc-now-says… With elections on the horizon is the CDC following “midterm science”? /1
“The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.” ― George Orwell, 1984 /2
“We are seeing more and more data that tells us, that while you get some protection from natural protection, it’s not nearly as strong as what you get from the vaccine," Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, Aug 2021 /3
National Institutes of Health Is Again Hiding Records About the Pandemic’s Origin disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-ins…
In the latest example, the NIH gave conflicting legal reasons for blacking out emails sent by Scientist Kristian Andersen and Science Magazine Writer Jon Cohen. #FOIA /1
"The agency's behavior here indicates to me that it is trying hard to prevent these records from being made available for public scrutiny,” @JamesCTobias tells me. /2
The NIH sent Tobias a set of 24 emails--first citing #FOIA exemption 6. When Tobias sued, the NIH sent the exact same email, exact same redactions, this time citing exemption 4 & 5. Compare side to side disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-ins… /3
NIH Tries Sealing Name of Chinese Researcher Attached to Discredited Pandemic Origin Study disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/nih-tries-se…
Court documents find NIH heavily redacts records in a haphazard fashion before making them public #FOIA /1
Remember the name of Chinese researcher “Kangpeng Xiao,” because the National Institutes of Health really, really want you to forget him. Here's the Dept of Justice's motion to seal #FOIAdocumentcloud.org/documents/2210… /2
Shortly after Kangpeng Xiao asked the NIH in March 2020 to delete some coronavirus sequences from the NIH SRA database, he published a study in Nature that argued a coronavirus discovered in pangolins was closely related to COVID-19. disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/nih-tries-se… /3