I don’t want to debate the margin, but I do think two things are becoming clearer every day.
(1) Shapiro, who is spending massively on the airwaves, is heavily favored against Mastriano, who is broke. (2) Shapiro is likely to outrun Fetterman (+10 in the poll)
By any metric, whether it’s fundamentals (money + partisan lean + ticket-splitting tendencies in gubernatorial races) or polling (topline + favorables), Shapiro is a very heavy favorite right now.
Shapiro is at 54% already, and his favorables are the inverse of Mastriano’s (which are underwater by double digits). You need a big swing *even if* Mastriano collects all undecideds — but that’s not as easy for him to do, because his campaign is broke and can’t spend.
And @SplitTicket_, we found gubernatorial races to be way more likely to diverge from the state’s presidential lean.
#PASen race will likely be close. I don’t think we can say that as confidently about #PAGov yet based on what we know.
My hot take is that this man's much-vaunted general election strength with the "Romney Coalition" is little more than a mirage, and that if he is the 2024 R nominee, he'll outrun Trump 2020 with working-class voters and underrun him with college-educated voters.
Live in a Trump +3 state, govern like you live in a Trump +30 one: the Ron DeSantis playbook. Also not the playbook to get the votes of socially liberal, educated voters who are much more likely to have significant exposure to people of different ethnicities and nationalities.
There's really not that much evidence to suggest DeSantis is some electoral god. His 2018 performance was ok, and he's outpacing Rubio by 2 points in polling averages, which is alright. 2024 polling suggests that the delta between Trump and DeSantis isn't really that big either.
This isn't unexpected, but one thing that I would be interested in seeing is how attack ads impact both Bolduc and Hassan. SLF has $23M booked against Hassan in ads that they have said they intend to keep for now, while there is no shortage of material for Dems vs Bolduc.
FWIW this is a race that I have at Leans Democratic for @SplitTicket_, but it is much closer to Likely Democratic than it is to a tossup at the moment, especially considering the inbuilt Dem issue advantage on abortion and NH's very heavy pro-choice lean.
One thing about Bolduc is that a lot of voters simply don't know who he is, which gives Dems an opening on attacks against him. Opinion on Hassan, as a former gov. and incumbent Senator, is far more baked in, which does help limit her downsides.
One thing about a 15 week abortion ban is that it is actually not nearly as popular as this website would have you believe and has been rejected roundly at the ballot box before.
And in this news climate, when voters read "15 week ban", the sticking word they see is "ban".
Colorado had an amendment on this on the ballot in 2020 with a suggested 22 week abortion ban, which is much more in line with the stance of the more moderate wing of the GOP. This was defeated by 18 points, though Biden won by 13.5.
Pre-Dobbs polling sold the GOP on the idea that 15 week bans are pretty popular nationwide because it polled better than absolute bans and was roughly breakeven. Once Roe was overturned, support for 15 week bans absolutely cratered. Hypotheticals are very different from reality.
It's good to expand the bands of uncertainty this cycle and recognize that there *are* systemic errors that have led Rs to be underestimated in places like Ohio the last 4 cycles.
It's also worth noting that Dem leads in PA/AZ are currently way outside those error bands.
So if the election was held today, I'd say what we're looking at, really, is a scenario where Dems hold AZ/PA while we see very close races in WI/NV/GA decide control of the chamber. Rs would need a clean sweep across those 3, assuming NH/CO/NC/FL don't flip, to take the Senate.
Didn't even bother listing Ohio because I don't want to get into *that* discourse here but if Wisconsin is close, Ohio probably stays R by like 5 points, which is a clear Dem overperformance but still a comfortable GOP victory.
This is one of the single worst public policy ideas I have ever seen in STEM education and it should be pushed back on forcefully.
A solid math foundation is critical for doing anything of use with data science/CS. Treating this as a tradeoff in high school is a horrible idea.
A good @LATimes op-ed here that addresses this idea. Math needs a revamp, but not the one that is suggested here, which would be counterproductive. You cannot tell students to study CS without giving them the tools to properly do it in the long-term. latimes.com/opinion/story/…
@latimes I actually have some credentials to be talking about this part of education, because I teach CS/Data Science at a university and am a full time software/ML engineer. A solid math/logic background is absolutely central to being a good engineer. You cannot get by without it.