Indic History Profile picture
Sep 17 14 tweets 3 min read
#HyderabadLiberationDay
#Thread

The Princely State of Hyderabad was ruled by Mir Osman Ali.
The Independence of India Act, 1947 offered the choice to the Princely States, of joining either IN or PK based on geographical contiguity & or the people's wishes. Hyderabad had none.
In a reverse of the situation in Kashmir, Hyderabad was a Hindu majority State ruled by a Muslim Nawab. There was no question of a referendum by the Nawab, since it was clear what the outcome would be. Image
The Nawab asked the British for a special status for HYD as a constitutional monarchy under the British Commonwealth. The request was denied.

The Nawab nevertheless went ahead with his own foreign policy by appointing agents in Europe.
The Nawab engaged with the Portuguese to lease land in Goa to get access to sea for his landlocked State.
Meanwhile the Nawab used an irregular army, AKA the Razakars (lit. volunteers). The Razakars were armed fanatics under the umbrella of Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen. Image
The Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) was formed in 1927 as a Pro Nizam party. In 1944 Qasim Rizvi was elected as the head of MIM. It was Rizvi who started the Razakar recruitment. Image
Rizvi & his Razakars wanted to resist accession of HYD to India & carve out an Islamic dominion in India & eventually accede to PK. There was a general state of unrest in the State. As the pressure on HYD started building up, the Razakars started communal violence.
According to an account by Mohammed Hyder, a civil servant in Osmanabad district, armed militant groups, including Razakars & Deendars & ethnic militias of Pathans & Arabs claimed to be defending the Islamic faith & made claims on the land.
"From the beginning of 1948 the Razakars had extended their activities from Hyderabad city into the towns and rural areas, murdering Hindus, abducting women, pillaging houses and fields, and looting non-Muslim property in a widespread reign of terror."
The violence was pushed by the MIM, which according to P V Kate's Marathwada under the Nizams, 1987 was formed to unite the Muslims in the State in support of Nizam & to reduce the Hindu majority by large-scale conversion to Islam.
The Police Action or Operation Polo by the Indian State eventually forced the Nizam to surrender & allowed the accession of HYD to India.
Rizvi was exiled to Pakistan. The Razakars were disbanded.
Before leaving for PK, Rizvi handed over the responsibilities of MIM to Abdul Wahed Owaisi, grandfather of Asaddudin Owaisi. Since the dream of an independent Islamic HYD was no longer possible. The MIM prefixed 'All India' to its name & became AIMIM.
An estimated 30,000 - 40,000 people, mostly Hindus were killed by the Razakars in the days preceding the liberation of Hyderabad. Thousands fled to the Indian territories from the border towns & villages of the State of HYD.
Jinnah warned of large scale violence & said, "If Congress attempted to exert any pressure on Hyderabad, every Muslim throughout the whole of India, yes, all the hundred million Muslims, would rise as one man to defend the oldest Muslim dynasty in India."
At the end the will power of a nation and Sardar Patel prevailed.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Indic History

Indic History Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IndicHistory

Sep 19
There are images circulating on Indian Twitter showing pre-revolution Iran where women are at beaches in bikini or in universities in western attire. What people don't realise is that it is not the complete truth.
The pre-revolution Iranian society was not particularly westernised as we are often made to think by pushing those images. On the contrary the Iranians were opposed to the westernisation efforts of the Shah.
The entire premise of Khomeini's opposition to the Shah was built around orthodox Islam. The people supporting him were aware of what they are getting into. The supporters included both men & women across the country. Tehran, Qom, Tabraiz, Isfahan, all witnessed mass riots.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 17
The problem with Delhi's 'education model' is that it is not adding any value, apart from a few classrooms here & there. The quality of education is still as bad as it used to be.
Delhi govt schools don't have enough infra to accommodate science stream. There are no teachers, classes or labs. On top of it not enough students get the min qualifying marks (50%) in their class X boards to justify science stream in govt. schools. What exactly is the model?
"...Children are not getting enough marks to get Science subjects.” Why are children not getting even 50% marks in their X board? The blame lies with the primary & secondary education system.

indiatoday.in/education-toda…
Read 9 tweets
Aug 14
In the dead of the night, a young girl woke up to find her parents burn newspaper in the courtyard. She was confused. A few days ago, her elder sister was stopped on her way to college by a group of men. Her parents burning newspapers in the dead of the night made no sense.
The mother came into the house and took the girl to the courtyard. Her elder sister was standing there in a corner, trembling in fear. The half awake, confused girl looked at her parents & her sister. The next thing she knew, her mother took a fistful of burnt newspaper..
and smeared it on her face. Next the mother took another fistful and smeared it on the face of the elder sister. The mother then dressed both the sisters in old dirty clothes. Together with the parents they got on to a tonga with just one steel trunk and left.
Read 8 tweets
May 5
The lost library of Gilgit.

In 1931, shepherds in the village of Naupur, 2 miles west of Gilgit, accidentally discovered a manuscript in a wooden box. Later in 1938, during excavation more manuscripts were discovered. Together these came to be known as the Gilgit Manuscripts.
Dated 5th/6th century CE, these manuscripts are scattered across Europe. A major portion, however is in National Archives in Delhi.

Written in Gupta Brahmi, it is estimated that there were approximately 50 manuscripts which contained 57 titles along with 17 Avadanas.
The manuscript contains texts on religion, ritual, philosophy, iconometry, medicine, etc.

From the excavations, it was deduced that the building was a Buddhist library for monks who possibly served as religious advisers, ritual practitioners, healers, copyists and scribes.
Read 7 tweets
May 4
Was trying to understand the methodology of @RSF_en's latest rankings. I landed up on the relevant page but was disappointed.

Out of the 7 board members who developed the methodology, 6 are of Western origing & 5 are men. 6 of the 7 are White, 1 is probably from India.
There are 5 indicators for assessing the degree of freedom -
Political context,
Legal framework,
Economic context,
Sociocultural context and
Safety.

There are questions assigned to each context, which are secret and not available to public.

rsf.org/en/index-metho…
The secret questionnaire is sent to individuals, including journalists, NGOs, activists, etc. The list is not made public and there is no way to know whether @RSF_en/@RSF_inter has any conflict of interest.

There might be individuals/org that the RSF funds & sends the survey to.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 18
Got tagged in this thread where allegations are made to make a case of a 'massacre' of 8000 Jain monks.

This is a similar case as that of the modern myth of 'breast tax' in Kerala. +
The alleged incident took place in 7th century as per a literary work of 11th century. There are no contemporary records of the incident. Jain records have no mention of any such incident. +
The frescos shown here were painted in 17th century (much after the original temple was desecrated by the Islamic armies of the Sultanate.

Conversion of the Pandiyan king to Shaivism after a defeat in philosophical debate is in line with practice of the day. No surprise there. +
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(