With Liz Truss appointed Prime Minister, it’s clear that the headline rate of the corporation income tax, the most economically damaging type of tax, will remain at 19 percent.
However, the headline rate was only one part of the corporate tax cliff edge that the #UK faced.
The super-deduction, which has temporarily made the UK tax system much more supportive of capital investment in plant and machinery, is also set to expire.
For many years, the #UK has adopted a strikingly ungenerous approach to capital cost recovery, creating a significant bias against investment.
This has coincided with consistently low levels of business investment.
Capital cost recovery is one of the most significant ways that the tax system weighs on economic growth.
The #UK ranked 33rd out of 37 OECD countries for ‘capital cost recovery’ on our 2021 International Tax Competitiveness Index.
The Treasury has considered making the system of capital allowances more supportive of investment and published a number of reforms, all of which would reduce marginal effective tax rates on new investment and boost investment, wages, and growth, according to our modeling.
𝘎𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘥 the Treasury’s initial suggestions by extending genuine full expensing to structures and buildings would more than triple the economic impact of capital allowance reform, boosting long-run GDP by 2.5 percent.
The #UK should be as 𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗱 as possible when it comes to 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗻𝘁 reform of capital allowances.
High up-front revenue losses should not necessarily be prohibitive, given their transitory nature, and can be reduced using an approach known as neutral cost recovery.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
⚡️ “Big Beautiful Bill” House GOP Tax Plan: Preliminary Details and Analysis
Our preliminary analysis finds the tax provisions included in the May 12 text would increase long-run GDP by 0.6 percent and reduce federal tax revenue by $4 trillion from 2025 through 2034 on a conventional basis before added interest costs.
Overall, the bill would prevent tax increases on 62 percent of taxpayers that would occur if the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) expired as scheduled.
President Trump once again floats the idea of replacing the federal income tax with new tariffs.
🧵Here are 5 things to know, via @ericadyork
1. The Math Doesn’t Work
The individual income tax raises more than 27 times as much revenue as tariffs currently do, but it’s not the gap in revenue levels that makes replacement impossible. The bigger issue is the relative size of the tax base.
To replace the roughly $2 trillion of revenue raised by the individual income tax with tariffs would require astronomically high tariff rates.
The carbon tax is the most efficient approach to tackle climate change—in theory. In practice, however, the policymaking process can interfere and water down the policy.
We consider several theoretical arguments for carbon taxes and the evidence from carbon taxes implemented around the world related to emissions, economic growth, distribution and revenue recycling options, other environmental taxes, green subsidies, and environmental regulations.
The latest inflation report confirms that prices for just about everything continue to rise, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) up 8.3 percent over the last year and many categories up even higher, including food (11.4 percent) and energy (23.8 percent).
While not part of the CPI, another measure of inflation is also surging: federal tax collections are up 23 percent over the last year, according to the latest data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).