Allowing girls to wear hijab to school may be viewed as an opportunity for children to learn about India's "diversity", the #SupremeCourtOfIndia says.
Do children of yesteryears (today's adults) have no idea of diversity, as they didn't witness this circus in their classrooms?
Do children of yesteryears (today's adults) have no idea of diversity, as they didn't witness this circus in their classrooms?
Foresee the cascading effect if this observation shapes the verdict. Different groups will demand their respective attires be accepted in school. The argument that their scriptures don't mandate it won't hold because that was not the basis in the #hijab case either.
The advocates of #hijab furthered frivolous arguments like ghoonghat, which no Hindu scripture demands.
If the SCI's own interjection, asking whether the right to dress included that to undress, was serious, will a Jarawa child be allowed to come to school naked?
If the SCI's own interjection, asking whether the right to dress included that to undress, was serious, will a Jarawa child be allowed to come to school naked?
In any case, scripture or no scripture, no girl child has ever pulled a ghoonghat on her head inside a school. No Hindu demanded appreciation of this "diversity" either.
Initial hearings of the case in the #SupremeCourtOfIndia were promising. Seems they lost it subsequently.
TE
Initial hearings of the case in the #SupremeCourtOfIndia were promising. Seems they lost it subsequently.
TE
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
