We see these effects with all types of COVID vaccine (mRNA, adenovirus, inactivated virus), suggesting this is likely to be a result of the innate immune response – akin to side effects such as sore arm and fatigue – rather than an effect of any particular vaccine component. 2/
This is in line with previous reports on COVID vaccines, as well as some old reports from other types of vaccine. 3/
This adds to the growing body of evidence that vaccination can cause changes to periods, but these are small compared to natural variation and quickly reverse.
Two reports on this from last winter are summarised here…
The corollary to the finding that vaccine-mediated changes quickly reverse is that if you notice a persistent change, that’s not likely to be vaccine-related so you should get it checked out and treated by a doctor, just as usual. 6/
And if you’re particularly worried about your periods, it’s also important to remember there’s evidence that COVID infection can alter periods – and not necessarily temporarily. Just another reason to avoid getting COVID if you can! 7/
(Links to studies on menstrual changes following COVID infection, since they wouldn’t all fit in one tweet!) 8/
Would I let this put me off getting a dose of COVID vaccine? Well, I’ve been working on this for about 18 months now, and in that time I’ve had dose 2 and a booster, so no!
(I’m likely not to be offered a booster this autumn, but if I am, I’m ‘aving it!) 9/
This is the point at which I usually congratulate the authors, but the eagle eyed will notice I have made a very small contribution to this one myself, so this time I’ll say it’s been a pleasure working with @edelmana1_ae and the team! 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The findings are roughly in line with two previous studies which concentrated breast milk in order to detect very low quantities of vaccine mRNA (in fact, this one finds a little less). Low et al... 2/
@NoMaloneZone@qandamazon I’ve read it so you don’t have to! (Though read it. It’s short, at least.)
We begin by noting that vaccines save lives – true. We go on to discuss the author going on breakfast television – also true (I understand) but not normally the stuff of the scientific literature. 1/
@NoMaloneZone@qandamazon The author then talks about the death of his 73-year-old father from coronary artery disease. I’m sorry for his loss. 2/
@NoMaloneZone@qandamazon The author then speculates that his father’s CAD might have been caused by receiving an mRNA COVID vaccine six months earlier. He notes that in the trials there was no evidence of increased CAD in the vaccine group (true). 3/
First, let’s note that we do have some data on pregnancy from the COVID vaccine trials. Participants were asked not to become pregnant, but some did by accident. The outcomes for these pregnancies were monitored as part of the trials, with no concerns emerging. 2/
In December 2020, Pfizer submitted data on its vaccine to the MHRA for temporary approval, which was granted. The documents on this are in the public domain... 2/
Periodically, Pfizer sends the MHRA some more data. On 16 August, they sent some additional data on boosting with different brands of vaccine. The documents were updated accordingly. 3/
There seems to be some confusion because the full approval documents for the Pfizer vaccine - published a few weeks ago - note that Pfizer did not themselves do any studies of the vaccine in pregnancy.
But this document describes only the data that Pfizer submitted to the MHRA, not the independently generated data we have from universities and government bodies, which track vaccine safety in more than 315,000 pregnant people and find no problem. 3/