Bombay High Court is hearing plea by BJP leader Kirit Somaiya seeking quashing of his own FIR on the ground that it was not properly recorded and not at his instance.

@KiritSomaiya @MumbaiPolice #BombayHighCourt
Court: You want to quash your own FiR?

Lawyer from Law Counsellors for Somaiya: At the first instance, the information which I gave is not recorded by the police officer.

Court: These entire prayers then will not come before us.

#BombayHighCourt
Court: Quashing of own FIR, transfer to CBI, and then initiate departmental enquiry? What is this?

#BombayHighCourt
Lawyer: Today some offence had happened…

Court: But you have set the law in motion… Was he injured? Is there anything to see how the FIR was lodged?

APP Sangeeta Shinde: After it was lodged, he refused to sign FIR. They can go before the concerned police officer
APP: and get supplement statement recorded.

#BombayHighCourt
Court: All your prayers are misconceived…

Lawyer: I am trying to lodge an FIR. It is not done on my instructions, but on instructions of superior. This is on first instance, so how can they exoect I will go to same police station?

#BombayHighCourt #kiritsomaiya
Court: So have you given something in writing to police? Anything?
Why not record your supplementsry statement and say it is not porpperly reocrded?

#BombayHighCourt
Lawyer: I have written to them immediately.

Court: When did you tell them? Show us.

APP: He refused to sign first FIR, he again gave a statement which he signed.

#BombayHighCourt
Court (to APP): Which is treated as FIR? If the earlier statement he is saying is not properly recorded and if it is not signed can you treat it as FIR?

APP reiterates, second submission is treated as statement.

#BombayHighCourt
Court: Honestly we are saying this day in and day out… crash course should be taken!!

APP shows exh. B which is signed at bottom and there is stamp of concerned police station.

Court: So you are treating it as a statement?

#BombayHighCourt
Court (to lawyer): What vested interest will police have?

Justice Dere: And firstly please do not raise your voice, do not try and intimidate the court. Is this your handwriting or not? Is this your signature or not?

#BombayHighCourt
Lawyer: This is a complaint that I am making that the police are manipulating my statement and not treating it as an FIR. That this is being falsely told to the court that they have recorded my statement.

#BombayHighCourt
Court: Even if FIR is quashed, what will happen?

Lawyer: I will take my remedy. I will move before the police station and lodge my fir.

Court: FIR is quashed, then you will go and lodge the FIR. So then why not go and record a fresh statement?
Court: what will happen is you lodge, and then we quash your FIR. Then the second FIR you lodge... Look at time, look at delay and then it will be called as politically motivated. You must apply reason and do what is right.

#BombayHighCourt
Court: Lodge your supplementary statement and say what you want in that. Take instructions.

Lawyer apologises for raising voice.

Court: We don’t like advocates raising their voice. We are not going to be intimidated but we just don’t like.

#BombayHighCourt
Court: It (volume) also does not depend on which clients you are representing. If you have a good case you need not raise your voice. Look at your earlier voice and look at your voice now. Anyway, we keep it back for 15 mins.

#BombayHighCourt
Lawyer: The Court may dispose off the plea, I will record my supplementary statement.

Court: Not pressing for other prayers?

Lawyer: I was anyway not going to, the grievance was only that statement was not properly recorded.

#BombayHighCourt
Order: Heard learned counsel for petitioner in plea for quashing of FIR. The petitioner has sougnt several reliefs. The learned counsel does not press for other prayer clauses.

#BombayHighCourt
Order: As far as prayer clause ‘a’ is concerned, he seeks quashing of FIR. He submits that quashing is sought on the premise that the statement is not recorded as per his instructions.

#BombayHighCourt
Order: Learned APP states on instructions of Senior PI that it is always open to the petitioner to record supplementary statement.Learned counsel for petitioner states on instructions in view of this statement he is not pressing for prayer a.

#BombayHighCourt
Order: and that he will go to police station and record his supplementary statement. Writ petition disposed off.

Lawyer apologises again.

Court: Sometimes volume rises depending on whom you are appearing for and the advocate gets charged up.

#BombayHighCourt
Lawyer: The APP was just making incorrect statement.

Court: But there has to be discipline maintained. Especially when someone is talking!

#BombayHighCourt

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench - Live Threads

Bar & Bench - Live Threads Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lawbarandbench

Sep 30
The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal against a division bench order of the Madras HC setting aside single-judge order cancelling election of E Palaniswami as AIADMK General Secretary.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar reads divison bench order.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Kumar: The division bench leaves the main issue open.

Justice Shah: That is for trial.. it's not to be decided at this stage, that's what it says.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 13 tweets
Sep 30
The Supreme Court is hearing a plea claiming that the State emblem at Central Vista is violative of the design specified under the Act of 2005.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Counsel: There is no scope for artistic innovation for a state emblem.

They are not only describing the design, but also giving a picture in the Act.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Counsel: Your Lordships have held that this is a symbol of national honour.

Justice Shah: The impression the emblem gives depends on the mind of the person.

Counsel: We are only asking for correction.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Read 4 tweets
Sep 30
The Supreme Court is hearing a plea by former minister Gali Janardhan Reddy to visit and stay in Bellary for four weeks.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora for Reddy: The mother of the child lives in Bellary. She's with my family there.

Justice MR Shah: Don't raise your voice, Madam. It will not help you.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Justice Shah: You never disclosed the baby was not born in Bellary. We have full sympathy.. What they are saying is the discharge took place only after arguments before this court.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Read 7 tweets
Sep 30
Kerala High Court is hearing two petitions challenging the summons issued by the ED to current and former officials of the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) in connection with its financial transactions esp around masala bonds.
@dir_ed
The first plea is moved by KIIFB itself cc challenging the repeated issuance of summons to it's office bearers

Read about the last hearing:
barandbench.com/news/ed-singli…
The other plea is moved by Dr. Thomas Issac, former Kerala Finance Minister, challenging the ED summons issued to him in connection with the KIIFB probe.
@dir_ed
@drthomasisaac

Read about previous hearing:
barandbench.com/news/dr-thomas…
Read 40 tweets
Sep 29
#SupremeCourt hearing Gautam Navlakha's plea seeking house arrest after his regular bail plea was denied.
Matter to be taken at 3.

Adv Kanu Agarwal: I wasn't aware that my lords had not received the letter (of adjournment). Let me get instructions this matter was listed late.

Adv: Let him out for two weeks atleast he needs a colonoscopy.
Sibal: Has no criminal history.

Justice Joseph: Let him breathe some fresh air. He wasn't even convicted in any small IPC offence earlier.
Read 32 tweets
Sep 29
#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench led by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul hearing case relating to top court's powers under Article 142 to grant divorce when parties are not consenting.
Sr Adv Indira Jaising arguing.

Jaising: Judge has to be arbiter, there will always be lack of consent.

Justice Kaul says where the Court has exercised Article 142 powers, it have made sure to put a quietus to the allegations: A blank slate given before granting divorce.
Justice Kaul: Look at the time period. From the 1990's the time has changed a lot...we have to do innovative thinking.

Justice Khanna points how abroad usually both spouses are working.

Jaising: I India, unfortunately, there aren't enough empirical studies.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(