The Biden administration and the media present Putin's threat to use nuclear weapons in response to military setbacks as an unprecedented break with long-established and hitherto unquestioned rules of international statecraft. This narrative is a lie. 1/ #nuclearthreats
In fact, the United States and other imperialist powers have not only considered on several critical occasions using nuclear weapons to reverse military defeats. They have directly threatened to drop atom bombs in order to extract concessions from their enemies. 2/
There are the well-documented demands of General Douglas MacArthur for the dropping of nuclear bombs on China, President Eisenhower's weighing of France's request for the detonation of nuclear devices at Dienbienphu, and Kennedy's threats during the Cuban Missile Crisis. 3/
Far less known and even more serious were the use of nuclear threats by President Nixon against the USSR and Vietnam. Operation Giant Lance was initiated on October 27, 1969, according to Wikipedia, to force a settlement of the Vietnam War on terms favorable to the US. 4/
According to Wikipedia, Nixon "authorized a squadron of 18 B-52 bombers to patrol the Arctic polar ice caps and escalate the nuclear threat... to coerce both the Soviet Union and North Vietnam to agree on favourable terms with the US, and conclusively end the Vietnam War." 5/
Nixon made use of what was referred to as the "madman" tactic to convince the Soviet Union that he was capable of ordering a nuclear strike. Another operation, related to Giant Lance, was "Duck Hook." 6/
Its purpose was to force North Vietnam, using the threat of a massive nuclear strike, to accept US terms for ending the war. Wikipedia states that Duck Hook called for the nuclear bombing of military targets throughout North Vietnam. This included: 7/
"the saturation bombing of Hanoi and Haiphong, the bombing of dikes to destroy the food supply of much of the population of North Vietnam, air strikes against North Vietnam's northeast line of communications as well as passes and bridges at the Chinese border ..." 8/
Henry Kissinger, Nixon's criminal accomplice, told the president that the US had to be prepared to use nuclear weapons. In a memo to Nixon, Kissinger wrote: "To achieve its full effect on Hanoi's thinking, the action must be brutal." 9/
Eventually, because of doubts about its strategic effectiveness and fear of a violent popular reaction, Duck Hook was not implemented. But Nixon continued to threaten Vietnam and the Soviet Union with nuclear war. 10/
This history proves that 1) the claims that Putin is breaking a previously unquestioned taboo on the use of nuclear weapons are fraudulent; and 2) that the US, if confronted with the prospect of military defeat, would certainly resort to nuclear warfare. 11/
Knowing that the US would use nuclear weapons if confronted with a desperate military situation, the Biden administration's relentless efforts to push Putin into a corner and force capitulation are totally reckless. 12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In its report on the August 20 car bomb assassination in Moscow of #daryadugina, daughter of the Russian fascist Alexander Dugin, the #NYTimes hastened to declare that there "was no evidence that the attack was connected to the war in Ukraine..." #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
The Times cited, without a hint of skepticism, the denial of Ukraine's involvement by #Zelensky adviser Mykhailo Podolyak: "Ukraine certainly had nothing to do with yesterday’s explosion. We are not a criminal state like the Russian Federation, much less a terrorist one.” 2/
But today, the Times has posted an article headlined, "U.S. believes Ukrainians were behind an assassination in Russia." It reports: 3/
With the deterioration of the Russian military position - the outcome of the reactionary strategy underlying the invasion of Ukraine and the general rottenness of the oligarch regime of capitalist restoration - the danger of #nuclearwar is escalating. 1/ #UkraineRussiaWar
Backed into a corner, #Putin's threat to use nuclear weapons should not be viewed as a bluff. The US and other imperialist powers have threatened in the past to use nuclear weapons to avert military defeat. This fact is being ignored by the media. 2/
In 1950 General Douglas MacArthur sought authorization to use as many as 30 atomic bombs against Chinese troops crossing the border into Korea. In 1954 France pleaded with US President Eisenhower to use nuclear bombs to save its encircled troops at Dienbienphu. 3/
The current edition of Foreign Affairs includes an article by @TimothyDSnyder, which provides further proof of his role as a purveyor of historical falsification - even to the point of covering up the mass murder of Jews by rightwing Ukrainian nationalists. 1/
The article, titled "Ukraine Holds the Future: The War Between Democracy and Nihilism", presents the regime in Kiev as the culmination of Ukrainian nationalists' heroic struggle, spanning more than a century, for freedom. He writes: 2/
"When Ukrainian leaders founded a republic in 1918, they revived the trident as the national symbol. Independence meant not only freedom from bondage but the liberty to use the land as they saw fit. Yet the Ukrainian National Republic was short lived." 3/
The scale of the disastrous defeat of Russian forces in #Ukraine is clearly evident in the Xi-Putin meeting. #XiJinping certainly asked #Putin to explain the catastrophic mismanagement of the war. But the latter has no strategically coherent explanation. #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
According to the South China Post, the Russian debacle "has obviously alarmed Chinese leaders." Putin told Xi: "We understand your questions and concerns" about the war. This is a shame-faced admission of his regime's desperate situation. 2/
Putin launched the "special operation" hoping that his "Western Partners" could be induced to make concessions to the oligarchic regime's security interests. But US imperialism, having maneuvered Putin into a war for which he was unprepared, is not interested in compromise. 3/
When I traveled to the Soviet Union between 1989-91, anti-Marxist intellectuals, academics and political "reformers" tended to giggle at the mention of imperialism, claiming that it was a fiction invented by Lenin and Trotsky to justify revolution. 1/
There was much talk about the Soviet Union becoming, once it repudiated whatever remained of the heritage of the October Revolution (which had already been largely eviscerated by the Stalinist regime), a "normal" country. 2/
The deliberate breakup of the Soviet Union led to 30 years of social, economic and cultural degeneration. Now the country stands on the brink of a catastrophe. The dissolution of the USSR has prepared the ground for the disintegration of Russia. 3/
The rapid collapse of Russian defenses, which threatens to develop into a disaster, is the product of not only incompetent military leadership, but also, and more fundamentally, the bankrupt political strategy upon which Putin based his "Special Operation." #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
Whatever the short term results of the defeats of the past three days - panicked retreats or a desperate escalation of the conflict - the events continue the course of unending disasters produced by the Stalinist dissolution of the USSR and restoration of capitalism. 2/
The events substantiate the International Committee of the Fourth International's opposition - from the Left - to the Russian invasion and its assessment of Putin's catastrophic political strategy. 3/