PetroTal #PTAL $TAL.V
While the company continues to grow its cash and profits, shareholders have seen their shares remain flat.
Within the next few months that could change and we may see the shares re-rated much higher. Let me explain./1
At the end of September PetroTal had $93 million cash on hand. With the news this week that Petroperu is to receive $1 billion++ US in funds, their ability to shortly pay the $64 million noted by PetroTal increases significantly./2
These two numbers total $157 million and are important to the repayment of the bonds. The CFO has stated that they want to maintain $75 million cash on hand (Aug 26 cc), and the bonds are $80 million. Any future cash flows (as of Q4) can then be used for dividends and buybacks./3
PetroTal has faced many operational challenges, with Q3 being no exception (water levels😞). In the face of this, they have generated an estimated $52 million US in free cash flow in Q3.
(As previously tweeted, they are transparent and their numbers are easier to understand)./4
They are guiding significantly higher production for Q4 +35% with a return to higher water levels for barging. Their ability to earn free cash flow at Q2s level is very good, as lower oil prices can be offset by higher shipments./5
Before the news on Petroperu's finances, they anticipated repaying the debt by the end of Q1/23. If Petroperu pays them shortly, repayment sooner would be better as they are incurring $800,000/mth in interest costs (Total of $4 million Nov-Mar)./6
With the debt repaid, one path to a re-rating than comes from a sustainable dividend policy. The CEO very much favors returning funds this way (EnerCom Denver Aug 22).
As an example, a $.03 US/qtr dividend is easily affordable with free cash flow averaging $.06 US/qtr. /7
Using this example, there remains ample funds for stock buybacks and business reinvestment, as noted by the free cash flow numbers.
Annualized it is $0.12 US. Converted it is CAD $0.16 and GBP 0.11
Consider the share price and yield of juniors who have a dividend policy./8
Surge Energy - dividend yield 4.75%, market cap $742 million
Evolution Petroleum - dividend yield 6.23%, market cap $258 million
Pine Cliff Energy - dividend yield 7.06%, market cap $600 million
/9
With my example of a $0.12 US annual dividend the share price can be re-rated to a range of $1.20 US (10% yield) to $2.40 US (5% yield).
CAD $1.60 to $3.20
GBP 1.05 to 2.10
This alone would increase the stock by 2.5x to 5.0x the current share price./10
Once the shackles of their debt restrictions are removed, they will have the ability to significantly influence the share price through dividends. This analysis illustrates that impact.
With Petroperu's payment this opportunity could be shortly upon them./End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“History never repeats itself, but it does often rhyme.” - Mark Twain
A long thread on interest rates and the stock market, compared to #uranium prices and a stock.
The bull market of 2004-07 as compared to that of the current 2021-202? /1
The #uranium bull market of the mid 2000s was marked by a period of rising interest rates. Between 2004 and 2006, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates 17 times from 1.0% to 5.25% to curb inflation and cool off an overheated economy./2
The stock market however continued on its merry way until mid-2007 when the financial crisis started. Meanwhile inflation in the US ranged from 3%-5.5%.
During this period the S&P returned 31% from 2004 to end of 2007./3
Seeing #uranium stocks drop from their highs has led to a lot of angst among investors/traders/speculators/etc.
If you are more a long term investor, perhaps this brief thread may help (or not🤷). /1
In the last uranium bull market, the market value of all the miners peaked out in the spring of 2007 at around $128 billion US. The spot price also hit a high of $137/lb.
In my opinion, spot is very important to investor sentiment and the related market value of the equities./2
At the end of 2019, I started measuring the value of all uranium miners including $KAP, which had gone public in late 2018 with a market value of $3 billion US.
To date the data shows that the value of the miners is directly linked to the price of spot, OVER A LONGER PERIOD./3
In April I tweeted this thread about SPUT & #uranium equities. In particular, I believe that when observing SPUT flows it can be a good indicator of whether funds will also flow into/out of the stocks, and of course, either drive prices up or down./1
From April 8th to May 24th (31 trading days) SPUT traded at a discount every day except for 3 (a record since public). As a result, they only managed to issue 332,500 units and not coincidentally, the spot price of #uranium also dropped from $63 in mid-April to $46 in May./2
Anyone with any #uranium stocks has, of course, also saw the downside of a rollercoaster during this time.
Interestingly, since May 25th SPUT has seen its units trade at a sufficient premium to issue a total of 2,847,500 units in 5 trading days and raise $33.5 million./3
I appreciate that today was a nasty day for everyone holding shares in #uranium companies.
I am by no means a stock market prognosticator, but I thought some perspective might help.
Take the information as you wish./1
The S&P 500 is now down 16% on a YTD basis as of today. Starting in 1928 the market has been down 30 times including this year. The avg decline was 15%, and the median 12%. There were of course years with 20%+ drops (1930, 31, 37, 74, 2002 & 08)/2
#Uranium stocks, in general, appear to have taken a barbell approach so far this year. The top 2 of 3 largest market cap have held up relatively well versus the S&P. Only $KAP has weakened more (IMO due to Kazakh events and Russia)./3
The sentiment of fund flows to/from SPUT and the #uranium equities appear very much linked so far. As SPUT has turned down, so have the equities.
Recap of what happened and what is happening.
After a strong run to mid-Nov last year, equities started turning down/1
SPUT led the downturn on Nov 18th as it started to trade below NAV and continued to do so for another 12 consecutive days. There were very brief spurts of interest but for the most part the trust traded under NAV for 23 of the 30 trading days to year-end./2
That was 6 weeks.
Once 2022 began, investors returned to the table and the trust saw inflows leading to above NAV prices for most of Q1 with brief periods of selling.
As we started April, sentiment was still very positive and the trust hit a closing high of $15.89 on Apr 8th/3
An unprecedented geopolitical realignment is taking place.
For utilities from North America, Western & Eastern Europe, & parts of Asia, not a question of if excluding Russian product, but when and how fast./2
Utilities are flexing up contracts with enrichers. Their capacity is tied up eliminating underfeeding and instead overfeeding. Now they require more UF6.
Biggest RFP right now for UF6 is from an enricher looking for 2000 tons/yr for 5 yrs competing with same utilities for UF6./3