Punjab’s Dalit groups, labour unions & farmers are protesting again. This time, it’s to protect their common lands. For years, the state has been trying to transfer these lands out of the villagers’ control, and into the hands of industries - now, by amending the law. #LCWThread
The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 governs common land in Punjab. It vests these lands in the gram panchayat to *manage*. Some of these lands are made up of villagers’ own contributions and managed by the Panchayat for their benefit.
Rule 6 of the Punjab Village Common Lands Rules, 1964 reserves 1/3 of cultivable common land for members of scheduled castes. Ill-implemented land reforms have systematically left Dalit communities landless, making this safeguard the only chance for many to have land to cultivate
In practice, however, this was rarely the case. “Dominant caste farmers would ensure that the common land is in the name of the Dalit labourer they employ, and reap its benefits,” says Ranjit Singh Shakri, leader of the Dalit Dasta Virodhi Andolan (@ddvavsj2013) in Tarn Taran.
As recently as April 2022, the Supreme Court has directed that common land may be used solely for the benefit of the villagers, so much so that even common land made up of villagers’ own contributions may not be returned to individual proprietors.
But Punjab’s government has been trying to wrestle common lands out of the community’s control & into the hands of industries for years, by using them to create “land pools” to be used for corporations. Here’s an excerpt from the state’s Industrial & Business Development Policy:
In 2019, it approved an amendment to the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 by inserting Rule 12B, allowing Panchayats to transfer common shamlat lands for industrial projects. Supposedly to “promote development of villages” by “unlocking the value” of the land.
This, despite the fact that the Supreme Court has repeatedly directed that village common lands are for common use such as grazing and tilling, and prohibited the sale or use of common lands to third parties or any commercial development. Here's an excerpt from a 2011 judgment:
The state of Punjab also has a long history of land-grabbing. In 2012, the state’s High Court had appointed a commission headed by retired Justice Kuldip Singh, to look into the issue.
Having studied records of nearly 40 villages, the commission found that nearly 25,000 acres of land had been illegally occupied through thousands of faulty sale deeds. It named politicians, cops and bureaucrats as having grabbed land: something the 2019 amendment would legalise.
The Punjab govt’s moves to dilute the law didn’t stop in 2019. On September 26 this year, the cabinet approved an amendment to Section 2(g) of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, granting *exclusive ownership* of common land to the Panchayat - an unprecedented move.
Would exclusive ownership granted by the Punjab government to gram panchayats allow the latter to sell common land to third parties or otherwise alienate it? The government hasn’t made it clear.
“With this new amendment to the Act, the land will be owned by the Panchayat, and the dominant castes who control the Panchayats could do away even with the quota for Dalits,” says Shakri. The land could also be given away to industries, despite the Supreme Court's directions.
Farmers who'll be impacted by the amendments too have staunchly opposed the move. Protests have erupted among farmer, labour & Dalit groups (see surl.li/difpi) who demand that ownership rights should be granted to cultivators of the lands who have tilled them for years.
“With this change,” says Nirbhay Singh Dhudike (@NDhudike), president of the Kirti Kisan Union (@KirtiKisan), “the Panchayat could transfer the land to corporates, lease it out, or worse: evict those who are currently using it to cultivate and graze their livestock.”
Research by @DilrajLawyer and @mukta_jo. We’ve covered this issue and more in our monthly newsletter. Subscribe, and visit our website for more updates on land and natural resource conflicts: landconflictwatch.org
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#Thread: Jahangirpuri Demolitions: Legal position, facts and data. A quick read 👇
On April 20, after letter from Delhi BJP chief demanding to bulldoze illegal encroachments of rioters, the North Delhi Municipal Corporation undertook an “anti-encroachment” eviction drive in Jahangirpuri demolishing homes, shops and businesses, mostly belonging to Muslims.(1/14)
Four days ago on April 16 a shobha yatra had been organised to mark Hanuman Jayanti in Jahangirpuri resulting in a communal flare-up. The violence and subsequent demolition drive was a repeat of two earlier such episodes in MP’s Khargone and Gujarat’s Khambhat.(2/14)
On Jan 14, protests against a proposed steel plant in Odisha turned violent. About 1,000 protestors were lathicharged in #Dhinkia village, injuring at least 30. But this isn’t the first time they have faced police action. A thread on what led to the violent incident 1/12
Village residents who had gathered to inspect their betel leaf plantations – their main source of livelihood – were stopped by the police. A steel plant by Jindal Steel Works (JSW) is proposed where these plantations currently stand 2/12
The police have reportedly blocked public access to the plantations since Dec 2021 and when people protested, the police allegedly resorted to force, beating up even women and children. They arrested members and the leader of the Jindal Pratirodh Sangram Samiti (JPSS) 3/12
Several infrastructure and tourism projects have come up in the fragile Himalayas, drawing concerns from locals and environmentalists. In the wake of the #UttarakhandDisaster here are some land conflicts from our database. 1/9
The Vishnuprayag Hydro-electric Project in Chamoli, which was damaged on Sunday during the disaster, has faced severe opposition from locals who are still fighting to safeguard van panchayat rights over common land. 2/9 landconflictwatch.org/conflicts/peop…
In 2020, the centre allowed resorts and commercial buildings to come up in the eco-sensitive Bhagirathi river valley in #Uttarakhand. These made the region vulnerable to disasters, experts say. 3/9 landconflictwatch.org/conflicts/eco-…
Thread: The Centre introduced a new land acquisition law in 2013 to protect the rights of land owners. But three states—K'taka, Maharashtra & TN—continued to use archaic state laws to acquire land for high-profile projects. How did they do this? Read on. (1/16)
In 2013, the Congress-led UPA government introduced the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (LARR) Act. The Act provides better compensation to land owners and makes it mandatory to seek their consent before acquiring their land. (2/16)
Land acquisition is a ‘Concurrent List’ subject under the Constitution, which means both the Centre and states can pass their own laws. However, all state laws on land acquisition became null and void the moment the LARR Act was passed. (3/16)
#Thread: Thousands of families in MP fear submergence of their homes after the Centre has forced the filling up of the Sardar Sarovar Dam to its full capacity. The Centre was aware of families living in the submergence area. Some pictures to show the ground reality. 1/9
Since 2014, the Centre has claimed that all families in the submergence zone have been rehabilitated. However, a letter from the chief secretary of Madhya Pradesh to the Narmada Control Authority in May 2019 said that at least 6k families still live in the submergence area. 2/9
The Centre ignored this & approved the Gujarat govt’s request to fill the dam to test its capacity. As the dam started to fill up and flood villages, the MP govt set up camps to assess the no. of people awaiting rehabilitation while the local authorities evacuated the people. 3/9
The repeal of Art 35A on August 5 has scrapped special land rights granted to the residents of Jammu & #Kashmir. Here’s a thread on some other legal provisions to protect ‘original’ citizens’ rights over land in the rest of India and how these provisions are under attack. 1/17
Article 35A, a by-product of Article 370 that gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, stated that permanent residents of the state would be conferred with special rights over the acquisition of immovable property in the state. 2/17
On August 5, 2019, Article 35A of the Constitution was abrogated on the grounds of it being “discriminatory against non-permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir” and to “enable economic development” in the area. Now, non-residents have access to land and property in J&K. 3/17