#SupremeCourt hearing an SLP challenging Bombay HC’s order for 20 % reservation of in-service candidates in PG Medical Courses.
Counsel says that it was wrongly alleged and is wrong that only 69 were eligible, refers to IA says 69 were eligible in the first round because of the Cut-off.
Court: (dictates) Pertains to reservation of 20% seats for in service candidates in PG Medical Courses by the Govt of Maharashtra.
On 15th Jan 2022 the National Board of Examinations leads this information bulletin for NEET PG 2022 exam. The last date for registration for the exam was March 22. Held in May. Results declared on June 1.
In September, Govt issued notice seeking out the schedule of the admissions of the exams.
The impugned schedule was challenged.
On 21 September 2022, the State government issued a brochure for admissions.
….the clause also envisages that reservation in-service made by the govt from time to time would apply.
BREAKING: #Supreme Court refuses to interfere with the order of the Bombay HC.
“The vacant seats to be distributed to non in-service category candidates”.
Supreme Court Affirms 20% In-Service Reservation In PG Medical Courses: 'Non In-Service' Category To Fill Unfilled Seats @AgathaShukla reports
[Gyanvapi Case] In Mosque Committee's revision plea, the Allahabad High Court adjourns hearing till November 3. Justice JJ Munir orally remarked that prima facie UP Kashi Vishwanath Act,1983 is not applicable to the present matter #Gyanvapi
The Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, Varanasi had challenged the maintainability of the suit filed by 5 Hindu women seeking permission to worship Hindu deities inside #Gyanvapi on the ground that it is barred by the provisions of three Acts namely....
... the Place of Worship Act, the Waqf Act and UP Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act. #gyanvapi
BREAKING: Special CBI Court Rejects bail to Former Home Minister and NCP leader Anil Deshmukh in the Corruption case registered against him by CBI @AnilDeshmukhNCP#cbi#corruption
The court noted that the statement of the approver recorded by additional magistrate plays an important role and therefore such statements cannot be overlooked
The court notes that the admissibility of the evidence cannot be answered at the stage of bail and that detailed examination of evidence cannot be taken at this stage.
#SupremeCourt to hear plea seeking urgent intervention by the Court to stop the growing menace of targeting and terrorizing of the Muslim community in India.
Plea also seeks initiating action under UAPA against persons engaging in hate speech against Muslims.
A bench of Justices KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy is to take up the matter.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appears on behalf of the Petitioner.
Court: What are you against, what is your prayer?
Sr. Adv. Sibal: What can we prove Milord, they dont' take any action.
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad case, seeking house arrest.
SG Tushar Mehta appears before Court on behalf of NIA.
Court is informed that Navlakha is being treated by doctors.
SG Tushar Mehta asks court if matter can be taken up on November 9th.
Court is also provided with Navlakha's medical reports.
@the_fauxy in it's reply to Sajid Khan's legal notice against a satirical article, filed through @falconlegalllp said, '#TheFauxy' is famously known for generating fictitious content solely for entertainment purposes and is well within its rights to publish such article. #BigBoss
@the_fauxy denied that it has lost sight of its obligations, duties and privileges and submitted that being an institution of media, the fourth pillar of democracy, it has well-observed his duties and privileges and it is in accordance thereof. #BigBoss16 #SajidKhan
Website (@the_fauxy) has relied on the judgment passed by the #SupremeCourt in the case of Indibily Creative (P) Ltd. Vs. State of W.B, wherein the Apex Court included the art of SATIRE WITHIN THE MEANING OF FREE SPEECH. #BigBoss16#SajidKhan
#SupremeCourt hearing a petition on extra-judicial executions (1528) in Manipur.
In May, this year, Court had asked the Union of India to file a status report on the investigation into the alleged executions.
Court notes that the investigation has been completed, and the subsequent steps have been taken by SIT.
Court: Whether the fake encounters were fake, good or bad is another question.
But what is to be noted is that despite the relations or the neighbours or certain concerned persons, having voice their grievances, they were not heard or the investigation was not even initiated.
That raises questions on the Constitutional framework.