I think the best thing the Tories could do right now is to bring back Theresa May, as a caregiver PM, and call a snap election.
Clement Attlee 2.0: It's time; for Keir Starmer to win that electoral mandate, and get the country recovering.
D'oh! Caretaker PM is the term I meant to use above, not caregiver PM, lol. See, I am informally a kind of caregiver for elderly family and I'd been reading about the subject when I happened to write the tweet. I don't even like the term. "Assistant" is more empowering...
The language we use for disability, impairment, and healthcare matters. I can (and do) tweet about it all the time.
Those UK voters who opted in 2016 to leave the EU had various reasons. Not all were or are anti-immigration, or even motivated by cross-cultural, nationality, or race issues. I love multiculturalism. My support *at that time* was nothing to do with that. It was constitutional.
I and, I suspect, many others in the UK, US, NZ, and elsewhere, supported a political-economic vision of smarter trade policies, expertly calibrated economic regulation, and more effective civil & political rights protection.
It was all a lie. I had helped enable the far right.
Globally, the fight back against the far right is well underway, and current polling makes that very clear in respect of the UK.
The RW won the 2016 Brexit vote by 4 points (52-48%). All of that lead is gone, and voters overwhelmingly want to reverse course ASAP.
However,
It's hard to see how the current Tory MPs can bring that policy into effect in their choice of a third PM in less than two months.
Too many are wedded to the damaging far right positions on economic, social, & foreign policy.
The UK will have to limp on toward an election.
I absolutely support the idea of appointing Theresa May as a caretaker PM, bc the national crisis is deepening, and lives are being lost as we speak. This is no time to elevate another far right politician in the mould of Johnson and Truss.
The UK needs a safe(r) pair of hands.
New Zealand's governing Labour party MPs did something similar in 1990. Just 5 weeks before the scheduled general election, they replaced the lacklustre Geoffrey Palmer with the more charismatic Mike Moore.
The goal was to stem the expected losses. It worked.
I'm a huge fan of Geoffrey Palmer; as an esteemed constitutional scholar. But replacing him just before the 1990 election enabled the NZ Labour party to survive 9 years in opposition then barnstorm it's way back into real power at the end of the decade.
Think long term, Tories.
The Tories will lose the next election, by a lot.
It doesn't matter who is PM before then, the juggernaut cannot be turned around. The only question is how much more damage will be done to the country, let alone their party.
It's a character test; take notes. Then #VoteLabour
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread: What the hell is going on with UK PM (for now) Liz Truss?
In this video clip she seems sedated. That's... an interesting way to handle the extraordinary set of circumstances she and her government are in.
Also, I don't think I've ever heard a UK Chancellor of the Exchequer refer to a policy decision in the first person. It's normally "we," as in Cabinet collective responsibility and respect for the PM as the final arbiter of such decisions in the House of Commons. Most odd.
Truss sits there, slow-blinking and barely showing any emotion or even looking around. Compare her body language with that of Penny Mordaunt, on the other side of Chancellor Hunt. Mordaunt seems more natural and authentic as she listens and tries to look busy reading something.
I'm going to list some of the most common ways to die in a hurricane.
But first I'm going to talk about the political culture in FL that worsens the problem.
And by the way, every major issue like hurricane harm reduction is already political and politicized. I'm not politicizing a tragedy. I'm giving y'all the honest truth about how to save more lives next time. I consider it my civic and ethical duty.
So I noticed a ton of damaged or destroyed boats either half-sunk at their moorings, or washed miles inland. As always happens. And it got me thinking... there are better options...
Boat owners and users had 4-5 days' notice that #Ian was likely to develop and landfall somewhere in FL. The forecast track became more certain over time, but even at 2 days out, the info was pretty solid. If it surprised you, then IMO you weren't listening properly to the data.
Not everyone would've had the option of doing this, but some did. It was possible to load up with lifesaving supplies and head out into the Caribbean to circle back behind the storm, boat intact, with the ability to assist many, many people in SW Florida.
Poor kid. IDK when how or why she allowed this, then decided it would be fun to share.
Every person who is a public figure has a duty to promote science based public health and safety messaging at all times but esp. during major disasters.
Granted, weather conditions at time and place of filming were not hazardous enough to warrant actually calling Child Protective Services but that's not the point.
To a person, they are clueless on how to behave with a working moral compass. They lack an ability to feel shame.
So it's a waste of time acting as if shaming them will work.
Equally, never give them the benefit of the doubt.