Share this page!

LawBeat Profile picture
Twitter logo
Oct 20 • 4 tweets • 4 min read
@the_fauxy in it's reply to Sajid Khan's legal notice against a satirical article, filed through @falconlegalllp said, '#TheFauxy' is famously known for generating fictitious content solely for entertainment purposes and is well within its rights to publish such article.
#BigBoss
@the_fauxy denied that it has lost sight of its obligations, duties and privileges and submitted that being an institution of media, the fourth pillar of democracy, it has well-observed his duties and privileges and it is in accordance thereof.
#BigBoss16
#SajidKhan
Website (@the_fauxy) has relied on the judgment passed by the #SupremeCourt in the case of Indibily Creative (P) Ltd. Vs. State of W.B, wherein the Apex Court included the art of SATIRE WITHIN THE MEANING OF FREE SPEECH.
#BigBoss16 #SajidKhan
"Well Within Its Rights To Publish Such Articles": The Fauxy Responds To Sajid Khan's Legal Notice Against Its Satirical Article @the_fauxy #SajidKhan #BigBoss
@Gautam_Adv28 reports
lawbeat.in/amp/news-updat…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 21
[Gyanvapi Case] In Mosque Committee's revision plea, the Allahabad High Court adjourns hearing till November 3. Justice JJ Munir orally remarked that prima facie UP Kashi Vishwanath Act,1983 is not applicable to the present matter
#Gyanvapi Image
The Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, Varanasi had challenged the maintainability of the suit filed by 5 Hindu women seeking permission to worship Hindu deities inside #Gyanvapi on the ground that it is barred by the provisions of three Acts namely....
... the Place of Worship Act, the Waqf Act and UP Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act.
#gyanvapi
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 21
BREAKING: Special CBI Court Rejects bail to Former Home Minister and NCP leader Anil Deshmukh in the Corruption case registered against him by CBI
@AnilDeshmukhNCP #cbi #corruption Image
The court noted that the statement of the approver recorded by additional magistrate plays an important role and therefore such statements cannot be overlooked
The court notes that the admissibility of the evidence cannot be answered at the stage of bail and that detailed examination of evidence cannot be taken at this stage.
Read 5 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 21
#SupremeCourt to hear plea seeking urgent intervention by the Court to stop the growing menace of targeting and terrorizing of the Muslim community in India.
Plea also seeks initiating action under UAPA against persons engaging in hate speech against Muslims.
A bench of Justices KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy is to take up the matter.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appears on behalf of the Petitioner.
Court: What are you against, what is your prayer?
Sr. Adv. Sibal: What can we prove Milord, they dont' take any action.
Read 21 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 21
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad case, seeking house arrest. Image
SG Tushar Mehta appears before Court on behalf of NIA.
Court is informed that Navlakha is being treated by doctors.
SG Tushar Mehta asks court if matter can be taken up on November 9th.
Court is also provided with Navlakha's medical reports.
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 20
#SupremeCourt hearing a petition on extra-judicial executions (1528) in Manipur.

In May, this year, Court had asked the Union of India to file a status report on the investigation into the alleged executions.
Court notes that the investigation has been completed, and the subsequent steps have been taken by SIT.
Court: Whether the fake encounters were fake, good or bad is another question.
But what is to be noted is that despite the relations or the neighbours or certain concerned persons, having voice their grievances, they were not heard or the investigation was not even initiated.
That raises questions on the Constitutional framework.
Read 10 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 20
BREAKING: #SupremeCourt refuses urgent hearing on a plea filed against a complete ban on #firecrackerban. The urgent mentioning has been made by @shashank_ssj stating that they have imposed a complete ban which is against the #SupremeCourt's order.
Justice MR Shah said, "Please let the people breath fresh air. There are so many other ways of celebrations. You can spend your money on sweets."
#firecrackers
#firecrackerban
Advocate @shashank_ssj mentioned before the bench that the #pollution is rising due to the burning of #parali as well, and that has sk been mentioned in the application.

To which, Justice Shah said that we'll hear you but later.
#firecrackerban #Diwali2022
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

Email the whole thread instead of just a link!

Separate emails with commas

:(