Exactly 100 years ago, on October 20, 1922, #Trotsky delivered one of his great political speeches before the membership of the Moscow organization of the Russian Communist Party. It was an extraordinary analysis of the challenges confronting the new Communist International. 1/
Trotsky examined the contradictory development of the world socialist revolution, which had achieved its first great victory in backward Russia rather than in the advanced centers of world imperialism. 2/ #socialism
He noted a basic difference in the revolutionary process in Russia, compared to that in an advanced country such as the United States. In the former, the great problem was not the seizure of power, but in holding it in the aftermath of the overthrow of the capitalist state. 3/
In the advanced countries, attaining power would be more difficult because "the bourgeoisie is far better organized and more experienced, because there the petty-bourgeoisie has graduated from the school of the big bourgeoisie and is... far more powerful and experienced..." 4/
Trotsky warned, prophetically, that having witnessed with horror the overthrow of the Russian ruling class, the bourgeoisie in the advanced countries were arming "counter-revolutionary gangs" to destroy the revolutionary socialist movement. 5/
Explaining the significance of Mussolini's rise in Italy, Trotsky described fascism as "the revenge, the vengeance exacted by the bourgeoisie for the dread it had experienced during the 1920 September days," when massive strikes swept the country. 6/
But why did the revolutionary movement fail, and lead to the upsurge of fascism? Answering the question, "What was lacking?" Trotsky stated: "Lacking was the political premise, the subjective premise, i.e., cognizance of the situation by the proletariat." 7/
"Lacking was an organization at the head of the proletariat, capable of utilizing the situation for nothing else but the direct organizational and technical preparation of an uprising, of the overturn, the seizure of power, and so forth. This is what was lacking." 8/
Trotsky rejected mechanical formalism which insisted on the inevitable and fully predictable outcome of great socio-economic and historical processes. In the "dialectic of historical forces," action by the working class, influenced and led by the Marxist party, is decisive. 9/
It is astonishing that this speech, delivered a century ago, retains such direct and extraordinary relevance. It is hardly even necessary to consult a glossary. Trotsky is dealing with economic, political and social issues that are comprehensible in fully modern terms. 10/
The careful study of Trotsky's writings is essential for the elaboration of the strategy and tactics of socialist revolution in the epoch of imperialism's death agony. Trotskyism is the Marxism of the twenty-first century. 11/11 marxists.org/archive/trotsk…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That a federal jury in Manhattan needed only 90 minutes to rule in actor #KevinSpacey's favor exposes the non-existence of credible evidence supporting accuser Anthony Rapp's claim that he was sexually assaulted by Spacey 36 years ago. 1/
But Rapp's claims, first made in 2017 in the early days of the rapidly escalating #MeToo witch-hunt, were sufficient to destroy the career of one of the greatest contemporary American actors. The media, led by the #NYTimes, treated untested accusations as proof of guilt. 2/
Spacey's career was brought to an immediate end. He was removed from "House of Cards" and fired from his starring role in "All the Money in the World." The outcome of the trial has vindicated the principled stand taken by the WSWS against the witch-hunt. 3/
Entering the new week, the #UkraineRussiaWar️ is escalating relentlessly. The @NYTimes reports explosions in the Russian region of Belgorod, well north of the Ukraine border. The city of Belgorod is an 8.5 hour drive from Moscow. US-NATO is extending the war into Russia. 1/
Both NATO and Russia are holding nuclear exercises. The NATO exercise, #steadfastnoon, starts Monday, involving 14 countries and 60 aircraft, including US B-52 bombers from Minot Air Base in North Dakota. The flights will be over Belgium, Britain and the North Sea. 2/
NATO describes the exercises as "routine," as if there could be anything routine about a nuclear exercise in the midst of a war that could lead, according to President Biden, to a nuclear #armagedon. In the meantime, Russia is going ahead with its "Grom" nuclear drill. 3/
Is there any limit to the wretchedness of the #NYTimes? Each day brings new evidence that no such limit exists. The latest specimen is David Brooks' column, "The Triumph of the Ukrainian Idea." It glorifies rightwing Ukrainian nationalism as the liberal ideal. 1/
Brooks' hero, Volodymyr Zelensky, "is fighting not just for democracy but also for Ukraine - Ukrainian culture, Ukrainian land, the Ukrainian people and tongue. The symbol of this war is the Ukrainian flag, a nationalist symbol." Brooks is wallowing in the rhetoric of fascism. 2/
But it is not just a matter of rhetoric.Brooks argues that liberalism, if it is to survive, must embrace nationalist mythology. He writes that national unity cannot be maintained on the basis of reason: 3/
The @nytimes reports that President Biden told a group of billionaires at a fundraising event last night:“We have not faced the prospect of #Armageddon since Kennedy and the #CubanMissileCrisis.” #nuclearwar 1/
Biden continued: “We are trying to figure out: What is Putin’s off ramp? Where does he find a way out? Where does he find himself where he does not only lose face but significant power?” These are questions that Biden should ask himself. 2/
Having instigated the US-NATO proxy war, provided #Ukraine with unlimited weapons and money, pledged the reconquest of Crimea, and called for regime change in Russia, what is Biden's "off ramp"? How can he deescalate "where he does not only lose face but significant power?” 3/
In its report on the August 20 car bomb assassination in Moscow of #daryadugina, daughter of the Russian fascist Alexander Dugin, the #NYTimes hastened to declare that there "was no evidence that the attack was connected to the war in Ukraine..." #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
The Times cited, without a hint of skepticism, the denial of Ukraine's involvement by #Zelensky adviser Mykhailo Podolyak: "Ukraine certainly had nothing to do with yesterday’s explosion. We are not a criminal state like the Russian Federation, much less a terrorist one.” 2/
But today, the Times has posted an article headlined, "U.S. believes Ukrainians were behind an assassination in Russia." It reports: 3/
The Biden administration and the media present Putin's threat to use nuclear weapons in response to military setbacks as an unprecedented break with long-established and hitherto unquestioned rules of international statecraft. This narrative is a lie. 1/ #nuclearthreats
In fact, the United States and other imperialist powers have not only considered on several critical occasions using nuclear weapons to reverse military defeats. They have directly threatened to drop atom bombs in order to extract concessions from their enemies. 2/
There are the well-documented demands of General Douglas MacArthur for the dropping of nuclear bombs on China, President Eisenhower's weighing of France's request for the detonation of nuclear devices at Dienbienphu, and Kennedy's threats during the Cuban Missile Crisis. 3/