@ESICM NIV failure - intubat the patient, COPD patient intubated, Vol Control, 7ml/kg PBW, I:E = 1:4 , RR 20. Then patient is "hypotensive". why?
@ESICM "Dynamic Hyperinflation". Consequences : Barotrauma, Haemodynamic instability, Asynchrony. How do we quantify dynamic hyperinflation? a). volume end-inspiration b). Pplat c).intrinsic PEEP d).None of them.
@ESICM What is "volume end-inspiration"? Disconnect from breathing circuit and measure the inspiratory volume trapped. Vei <20ml/kg -> low res kof barotrauma / Haemodynamic instability. original paper in 1987
Thus, we undertake "intrinsic PEEP'. iPEEP may be an under-estimate.
How much PEEP should be used if iPEEP = 8 and patient is relaxed?
a). ZEEP b). PEEP 5 c). PEEP 8. d). Not use PEEPi to set external PEEP
Complex question. Several outcomes possible from different patient phenotype
Unpredictable which one your patient gonna be as quite diametric responses
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16003057/
Above link paper: Why is this? This is because applying different levels of PEEP stents the airway.
as a result, try any of the 3 options BUT be prepared to change depending on how your pt phenotype.
These patients also have higher asynchronies due to the extra lung volume. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12821570/
Again P oes can be used to detect intrinsic PEEP.
Finally, 1st line treatment COPDe = NIV (?HfNO potentially). Quantify and Rx dynamic hyperinflation. Don't care about ABG. PEEP setting during controlled vs. assisted MV.
Summary paper : pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33169215/
Audience ?1: ECCO2R with or without NIV is a possibility? Luigi Camporota : yes possible sometimes to prevent intubation or to help facilitate extubation and minimise muscle loss, etc. Q2: in terms of SpO2 target, best to go with patient's own spo2 - not higher or lower.
Q3. What about "cor pulmonale"? The theme is emerging which is that you need to combine the respiratory and cardiovascular. intubation these patients with cor pulmonale could have significant consequences. The holistic care. #WeAreICU#TogetherICU#IntensiveCare#CriticalCare
Q4. Awake proning on NIV for COPD patients? No evidence - individually tried from the expert panel - not great anecdotal experiences.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Mariangela PELLEGRINI
Uppsala- Sweden
"Do we Need a biological definition of ARDS"
- Berlin definition has NO Diffuse alveolar damage .
- the Berlin defn does not capture well
Frohlich - different definitions specificity of 0.63, 0.42, 0.31 even! #ventilation#ards#LIVES2022
ARDS - new definition or phenotypes by @GicoBellani refreshing with Kigali definition of ARDS - useful not just low resource but during pandemic in supposedly high income settings and only draw back is no PEEp requirement #ards#ventilation#LIVES2022@ESICM
@GicoBellani@ESICM Resolved versus confirmed ARDS
- prospectively applying Berlin definition did work but if ya wait 24 hrs and re-measure P/F ratio, you end up stratifying much better.
- Better separation of groups
NEXT Speaker : VA ecmo for which patients?
Alain COMBES
Severe cardiogenic shock has different phenotypes 1. medical cardiogenic shock(AMI, end stage dilated CM, myocarditis, septic shock) 2. Post cardiotomy refractory CS (post CABG) #LIVES2022 @ESICM#ecmo#resuscitation#ALS
@ESICM 2022 what do the guidelines say
- ESC recommends short term MCS should be considred in cardiogenic shock.
IABP may be considered but not routinely recommended in post MI #LIVES2022
@ESICM PARAMEDIC 2 - big study
8007 pts, adrenaline 4000, placebo 3999
- a lot of discussion post trial
- need a nuanced interpretation.
- 19 "more good" survivors and 5 "more bad" survivors in adrenaline arm.