3/Look at this great sample abstract that I’ve colored so you can see what is where.
Note that there is text stating the gap in yellow.
This sentence is a CLEAR, DIRECT statement of where there is a gap in the field that needs to be filled.
4/Stating gaps DIRECTLY in your paper/grant means no required interpretation for the readers.
It ensures they will see exactly why your work is necessary!
5/Try this on your own work - use my coloring technique to show the gap.
Make sure you have one sentence you can color in yellow that directly states what GAP your work seeks to fill.
Not sure how to do it yourself – check out this free YouTube video: bit.ly/3xxNehS
6/ Diagnose it
Good news: abstracts are shorter so a missing gap is easier to find.
Check out what an abstract would look like if the gap was missing.
Do you see how much it negatively affects this abstract to have the GAP missing?
7/
CLEARLY articulating that gap is
HOW
the reader is able to judge how big or important of a step your work is!
8/ Grant proposals:
Luckily you can use the same coloring techniques in grants to find direct statements of the gap in EACH paragraph of the introduction and one sentence in the abstract.
Ta da!
9/ Detailed materials
If you’re unsure if you’ve sufficiently covered the GAP in your introduction, check out this thread to make sure it is not overlooked:
Get into the right mindset to write your grant proposal.
Follow this link from my latest THREAD about how to think about your grant proposal and how to set your mindset to eliminate a lot of issues!
3/ LAYOUT:
Your grant proposal should read like a magazine.
1. Catch & hold your reviewers attention 2. Easy to understand 3. Absolutely certain the reviewer can’t miss key information 4. Easy to sell your proposal to the committee
🧵 Scientific Grant Writing: biggest mistakes & how to avoid them-YouTube thread
Scientific grant writing can be quite a challenge.
I review 10s of grants a year and want to teach you the biggest mistakes and how to avoid them for FREE
1/ First, start with this video explaining the mindset to have when grant writing, plus learn who reviews your proposal and what the review process looks like. 👇🏼
👇🏼 2/ Scientific grant writing mistakes in relating to the reviewer: A grant review isn't the same as for a paper- How to stand out and get them on board.
🧵A thread to set your GRANT WRITING MINDSET!
I review >10 GRANT PROPOSALS/yr, and find consistent mistakes that can be fixed with a quick MINDSET shift:
How to think about a proposal
Who reviews it
The review process @OpenAcademics@PhD_Balance@PhDfriendSana #Academicchatter
Writing grants is notoriously HARD for…well, everyone.
One of the reasons its so tough for academics especially is that we are used to thinking about RESEARCH PAPERS...
BUT the mindset for a grant is VERY different.
Let’s dig in…
2/
I always start workshops by asking attendees how THEY think of their grant proposal – more like a magazine or a newspaper?
Which do you think it is?