The State appreciates Artha & Kama only.
- Highly places its own Artha
- Not aware of its own Kama
- Places Artha-Kama of the Society as subservient to its own
- Does not recognize Moksha (Daiva)
- Appreciates Dharma only as Law & Order
Purushartha imbalance.
+
The Landlord, on the other hand
- Is solely concerned of his own Artha Kama
- Is unconcerned about the Society’s AK
- Has delinked himself from Moksha (Daiva - Ancestral Tradition)
- Seeks to manipulate even the L&O part of Dharma of the State
A Tragedy that Modernity brings.
+
The Community on the other hand
- Has let Modernity corrupt its Artha-Kama
- But has not lost its connection with the Sacred (Daiva)
- Hence, they retain a sense of Dharma without the strength to invoke it
Finally, a sacrifice was necessary for the society to invoke it.
+
We can extend this to various elements of the Society and we will see that every important aspect of our Classical Tradition playing its role.
We develop a new but an ancient vocabulary to explain life around us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We were one people much before the word Hindu became a descriptor. The Puranas & Mahabharata present this unimpeachable reality. Vishnupurana (VP) does this most beautifully & succinctly.
Vishnupurana is a major Purana consisting of 7000 verses. Modern Historians date it between 400BC to 900AD. Even if you average it out, it is pre-Gupta.
It has 6 Amshas (large Parts). The first 3 Chapters of 2nd Amsha - are illuminating. Our Concern here is the 3rd Ch.
On the eve of #GandhiJayanti , I am settling into my own assessment of his contribution and importance.
This thread is a reflection of my own assessment based on what I have read about Gandhi - through his own writings and others.
Will begin with Positives & then Negatives.
+
1. His understanding of the Indian past. Among the few who had no inferiority about the Tradition.
- Actively defended the Kula-Jati-Varna aspect of the Society
- Held the Indian Kings in great esteem.
- Understand the functional mechanics of the society, spoke its language
+
2. His understanding of Modernity and its evil dimension.
Hind Swaraj is the most scathing criticism of Modernity ever. May not contain complex abstract nouns, models, theories, hypothesis.
But represents fundamental issues of Modernity in a way all can understand.