This is communal #ISI-#Khalistani propaganda. No "Hindu mobs" did not kill Sikhs, Congress goons did.

See my recent discussion with @madhukishwar who was an eyewitness. The Congressi paid mobs including Muslims, Sikh women were raped in a mosque. Hindus protected Sikhs in 1984.
The mobs were not based on religion. They were hired Congress goons. All across Delhi, "majority" Hindus protected Sikhs. If Hindus had turned against them, none would have survived.

Most of those who protected Sikhs in Delhi were also Hindu. This was not a Hindu motivated-riot. It was political violence engineered by Congress. The religion of the perpetrators was mixed, and irrelevant. They were hired criminals.

See eye-witness accounts of @madhukishwar of the Congress anti-Sikh violence of 1984.

The mob was largely Muslims and Gujjars; they were given money, loot and police protection by the Congress. Or they were "seculars" like Tytler.

Those who sheltered and protected their Sikh neighbors were overwhelmingly Hindu (and in one case, a Muslim)

झूठ। जिन्होंने ने मारा वह किसी रोष में नहीं थे ना भारत माता से जुड़े थे। कांग्रेस ने पैसे दिया थे, कहा था जाओ लूटो और मारो, पुलिस कुछ नहीं करेंगे। चोर उचक्के थे, धर्म से प्रेरित नहीं थे।

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sankrant

Nov 2
Any Sikh who follows the Sikh gurus is not a Khalistani.

Colonialism is not self-respect. These are Macuallife-putras. Their guru is British colonial scholarship which manufactured a "Sikh religion" in opposition to Hindus for the purpose of imperialism.
The shishya's of Macaullife (McSikhs) would disown anything the Gurus wrote if it doesn't conform to Macaullife-religion. 😏

Macaullife, assigned by the British to craft a separate "Sikh identity" met many Sikhs, including descendents of the Gurus, who told him they're Hindus.

That would not work for the Empire's needs. So he taught them their "true" religion, they'd "lost."

Read 10 tweets
Oct 29
In a global context Islam is one of 2 world-dominating religions with an agenda of spreading aggressively. To bracket it into some kind of generic “minority” is dishonest.

People from a country with less than 3% Muslims shouldn’t pontificate to those with 5-10% (like France)..
Exactly, and you've no idea of the impact of Islam on France e.g., let alone India where nearly 200 *million* Muslims live. @daatdarling is talking in a global historical pagan context.

But commentary on "Hindutva" from US is ignorant and US-centric.

Much of academia and media in the US ignorantly comments on the situation in India. You are not qualified to do so unless:

1. You were invaded by Islamic armies
2. Your country partitioned for a "Muslim homeland."
3. You still have 200 million Muslims

Read 6 tweets
Oct 25
The absolutely insufferable apologist for imperialism @SuellaBraverman is back in @RishiSunak's cabinet. 😏

indianexpress.com/article/world/…
This is vile.

No the British Empire did not create “infrastructure.” Japan has much better railways than India. One does not have to be colonized and robbed dry to get trains.

Britain drained India’s wealth, killed its industry, impoverished and massacred its people.
Check out the condition of Paris before Haussmann's renovation. It is a filthy city full of garbage and overflowing sewage, lacking civic infrastructure.

On the other hand, foreign travelers describe Indian cities in glowing terms prior to colonization.

Read 4 tweets
Oct 24
If Rishi Sunak were to become Prime Minister of UK, we'll have Indian "liberals" lecturing us on how open-minded and gracious the English are to accept an Indian, while "parochial" Indians rejected Sonia. What they won't say:

1. Rishi was born, educated, brought up, in England.
Sonia Maino was born, brought up, educated outside of India.

2. Rishi is fluent in England's language; Sonia remains a foreigner in how she speaks.

3. Sonia's only qualification to be PM of India was who she married. Rishi and Kamala rose due to their work and qualifications.
Despite her obvious foreignness Sonia was de facto PM for 10 yrs.

Rishi lost to Liz Truss largely because he was Brown. Even now conservative voters have a hard time accepting a Brown PM as this caller shows; and Labour routinely displays #Hinduphobia.

Read 4 tweets
Oct 24
If Rishi Sunak becomes PM a bonus will be that the implicit racism of the Left and their Hinduphobia will get revealed more openly. You'll find it come up in many different ways, just like the @guardian cartoon on Priti Patel.
Of course, this doesn't mean that the Tories' racism will be any less on display.

Nonetheless, if he becomes PM, the Tories would be the party putting the first non-White PM in power.

Lol on the Tories meltdown. Check the comments as well.

Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(