This is communal #ISI-#Khalistani propaganda. No "Hindu mobs" did not kill Sikhs, Congress goons did.
See my recent discussion with @madhukishwar who was an eyewitness. The Congressi paid mobs including Muslims, Sikh women were raped in a mosque. Hindus protected Sikhs in 1984.
The mobs were not based on religion. They were hired Congress goons. All across Delhi, "majority" Hindus protected Sikhs. If Hindus had turned against them, none would have survived.
Most of those who protected Sikhs in Delhi were also Hindu. This was not a Hindu motivated-riot. It was political violence engineered by Congress. The religion of the perpetrators was mixed, and irrelevant. They were hired criminals.
झूठ। जिन्होंने ने मारा वह किसी रोष में नहीं थे ना भारत माता से जुड़े थे। कांग्रेस ने पैसे दिया थे, कहा था जाओ लूटो और मारो, पुलिस कुछ नहीं करेंगे। चोर उचक्के थे, धर्म से प्रेरित नहीं थे।
Any Sikh who follows the Sikh gurus is not a Khalistani.
Colonialism is not self-respect. These are Macuallife-putras. Their guru is British colonial scholarship which manufactured a "Sikh religion" in opposition to Hindus for the purpose of imperialism.
Macaullife, assigned by the British to craft a separate "Sikh identity" met many Sikhs, including descendents of the Gurus, who told him they're Hindus.
That would not work for the Empire's needs. So he taught them their "true" religion, they'd "lost."
In a global context Islam is one of 2 world-dominating religions with an agenda of spreading aggressively. To bracket it into some kind of generic “minority” is dishonest.
People from a country with less than 3% Muslims shouldn’t pontificate to those with 5-10% (like France)..
Exactly, and you've no idea of the impact of Islam on France e.g., let alone India where nearly 200 *million* Muslims live. @daatdarling is talking in a global historical pagan context.
But commentary on "Hindutva" from US is ignorant and US-centric.
No the British Empire did not create “infrastructure.” Japan has much better railways than India. One does not have to be colonized and robbed dry to get trains.
Britain drained India’s wealth, killed its industry, impoverished and massacred its people.
Check out the condition of Paris before Haussmann's renovation. It is a filthy city full of garbage and overflowing sewage, lacking civic infrastructure.
On the other hand, foreign travelers describe Indian cities in glowing terms prior to colonization.
If Rishi Sunak were to become Prime Minister of UK, we'll have Indian "liberals" lecturing us on how open-minded and gracious the English are to accept an Indian, while "parochial" Indians rejected Sonia. What they won't say:
1. Rishi was born, educated, brought up, in England.
Sonia Maino was born, brought up, educated outside of India.
2. Rishi is fluent in England's language; Sonia remains a foreigner in how she speaks.
3. Sonia's only qualification to be PM of India was who she married. Rishi and Kamala rose due to their work and qualifications.
Despite her obvious foreignness Sonia was de facto PM for 10 yrs.
Rishi lost to Liz Truss largely because he was Brown. Even now conservative voters have a hard time accepting a Brown PM as this caller shows; and Labour routinely displays #Hinduphobia.
If Rishi Sunak becomes PM a bonus will be that the implicit racism of the Left and their Hinduphobia will get revealed more openly. You'll find it come up in many different ways, just like the @guardian cartoon on Priti Patel.