2/Lumbar stenosis has always been controversial. In 2012, they tried to survey spine experts to come to a consensus as to what are the most important criteria for canal & foraminal stenosis. And the consensus was…that there was no consensus. So what should you use to call it?
3/Well, you don’t want just gestalt it—that is a recipe for inconsistency & disagreement. But you don’t want to measure everything either—measurements are not only cumbersome, they introduce reader variability & absolute measurements don’t mean the same thing in every patient.
4/Think of it functionally. Nerves need to fit in their space, like you fit in clothing. Mild stenosis is like comfy clothes—no squeezing. Moderate stenosis clothing isn’t loose, but there isn’t extra room either. Severe stenosis is like too tight jeans, your body gets compressed
5/So how do we tell if the nerves have enough room—if the clothing fits loosely, tight, or too tightly? We look at the space around them. For the canal, it is CSF—if there's enough room, extra space will be filled by CSF. For foramina, it is fat—extra room is filled by fat.
6/For mild canal stenosis, there is mild attenuation of the CSF space, but there is still plenty of CSF around, just like there is plenty of room in your comfy sweat pants
7/For moderate canal stenosis, the canal starts closing in, so there is less CSF around and the nerve roots appear aggregated. It’s like the clothes you wear to the club, there isn’t much room between your skin & the clothing, but you can still fit into them (hopefully)
8/Severe canal stenosis is the too tight jeans. The canal doesn’t just hug up to the nerve roots, it compresses them. Like your belly after a big meal trying to get into tight jeans, they get squished and deformed in order to fit, so they can’t be separated from each other.
9/This classification isn’t just easy to remember, it’s also evidence based. This is the Lee classification that has excellent reproducibility not just among radiologists, but among everyone. And it does correlate w/increasing symptoms.
10/For foraminal narrowing, the nerve inside the foramen has fat around it on four sides that can be attenuated as the space gets tighter. How many sides are attenuated determines how severe the stenosis is.
11/Mild stenosis is where you have loss of the fat on 2 sides. So it is still comfy clothing bc the fat is preserved on the other two sides, so you still have lots of space.
12/For moderate stenosis, you lose the space on all four sides, but the nerve itself is not compressed or deformed. Like a sleek outfit, it shows your curves, but doesn’t deform them. It’s not a comfy outfit, per se, & I wouldn’t eat a lot while wearing it, but it’s not too small
13/For severe stenosis, we are trying to fit into those jeans from high school and it isn’t going well. You are squishing in everything you can to get it to fit. Same with the foramen—the fat isn’t just gone, the nerve is compressed and deformed.
14/This is also named the Lee system. It fits well with the Lee classification for canal stenosis. It also is extremely reproducible and correlates with findings at surgery.
So you don’t have to remember a complicated system—just ask yourself, how does the clothing fit?
15/So put away your measuring calipers! You can end the inter-observer variability. These systems are easy to remember, make sense, and are based in evidence. As they say, if it fits—wear it!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I always say, "Anyone can see the bright spot on diffusion images—what sets you apart is if you can tell them why it’s there!”
If you don't why a stroke happened, you can't prevent the next one!
Can YOU tell a stroke’s etiology from an MRI?
Here’s a thread to show you how!
2/First a review of the vascular territories.
I think the vascular territories look a butterfly—w/the ACA as the head/body, PCA as the butt/tail, and MCA territories spreading out like a butterfly wings.
3/Of course, it’s more complicated than that.
Medially, there are also small vessel territories—the lenticulostriates & anterior choroidal.
I think they look like little legs, coming out from between the ACA body & PCA tail.
1/Asking “How old are you?” can be dicey—both in real life & on MRI!
Do you know how to tell the age of blood on MRI?
Here’s a thread on how to date blood on MRI!
After reading this, when you see a hemorrhage, your guess on its age will always be in the right vein!
2/If you ask someone how to date blood on MRI, they’ll spit out a crazy mnemonic about babies that tells you what signal blood should be on T1 & T2 imaging by age.
But mnemonics are crutch—they help you memorize, but not understand
If you understand, you don’t need to memorize
3/If you look at the mnemonic, you will notice one thing—the T1 signal is all you need to tell if blood is acute, subacute or chronic.
T2 signal will tell if it is early or late in each of those time periods—but that type of detail isn’t needed in real life
@TheAJNR 2/Since the prehistoric days of medicine (1979!), we knew that some brain tumor patients treated w/radiation (XRT) initially declined, but then get better.
Today, we see this on imaging, where it looks worse early, but then gets better.
Now we call this pseudoprogression.
@TheAJNR 3/Why does this happen?
XRT induces a lot of inflammatory changes—from initiating the complement cascade to opening the blood brain barrier (BBB)
It’s these inflammatory changes that make the imaging look worse.